此代码的目标:具有N个标记顶点和K个未标记边缘的简单连接图的数量。
注意:这可能被视为代码复审问题,但经过反复尝试,我认为python和java代码具有相同的功能。我不确定代码是否有问题,或与语言错综复杂有关,或者我在忽略某些事情时出错。
这是针对Google Foobar的挑战。我用上面的方法完成了它。我已经发布了所有源代码的链接,它们测试了所有可能的情况。
第一种方法完全有效。只发出 - 它使O(NK)递归调用,K在N中平均为二次方。[Full source]
一位朋友提出了一种算法,用自下而上的方法做同样的事情。主要功能:
def answerHelper(n,k):
totalGraphs = 0
for s in range(1,n):
graphs = 0
for t in range(0,k+1):
graphs += answer(s, t) * answer(n - s, k - t)
graphs = choose(n, s)*s*(n - s) * graphs
totalGraphs+= graphs
return totalGraphs/2
F = {}
def answer(n, k):
if (n, k) in F:
return F[n, k]
N = n * (n - 1)/2
if k is n - 1:
return int(n ** (n-2))
if k < n or k > N:
return 0
if k == N:
return 1
result = ((N - k + 1) * answer(n, k - 1) + answerHelper(n, k - 1)) / k
F[n, k] = result
return result
与原始工作的Java代码 [diffchecker]相比,python在4种情况下失败。我认为这是因为某种溢出(?)。 [Full python source]
我正在尝试将此python代码转换为Java。这就是我想出来的。
static Map<List<Integer>, String> resultMap = new HashMap<List<Integer>, String>();
public static String answer(int N, int K) {
/* for the case where K > N-1 */
// check if key is present in the map
List<Integer> tuple = Arrays.asList(N, K);
if( resultMap.containsKey(tuple) )
return resultMap.get(tuple);
// maximum number of edges in a simply
// connected undirected unweighted graph
// with n nodes = |N| * |N-1| / 2
int maxEdges = N * (N-1) / 2;
/* for the case where K < N-1 or K > N(N-1)/2 */
if(K < N-1 || K > maxEdges)
return BigInteger.ZERO.toString();
/* for the case where K = N-1 */
// Cayley's formula applies [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cayley's_formula].
// number of trees on n labeled vertices is n^{n-2}.
if(K == N-1)
return BigInteger.valueOf((long)Math.pow(N, N-2)).toString();
/* for the case where K = N(N-1)/2 */
// if K is the maximum possible
// number of edges for the number of
// nodes, then there is only one way is
// to make a graph (connect each node
// to all other nodes)
if(K == maxEdges)
return BigInteger.ONE.toString();
// number of edges left from maxEdges if I take away K-1 edges
BigInteger numWays = BigInteger.valueOf(maxEdges - K + 1);
// number of graphs possible for each of the numWays edges for a graph that has 1 less edge
BigInteger numGraphsWithOneLessEdge = new BigInteger( answer(N, K-1) );
// number of all possible subgraphs with K-1 edges
BigInteger subGraphs = answerHelper(N, K-1);
// numWays*numGraphsWithOneLessEdge + subGraphs
BigInteger result = subGraphs.add(numWays.multiply(numGraphsWithOneLessEdge));
// this contains repeats for each of the K edges
result = result.divide(BigInteger.valueOf(K));
// add to cache
resultMap.put(Collections.unmodifiableList(Arrays.asList(N, K)), result.toString());
return resultMap.get(tuple);
}
private static BigInteger answerHelper(int N, int K) {
BigInteger totalGraphs = BigInteger.ZERO;
for(int n = 1 ; n < N ; n++) {
BigInteger graphs = BigInteger.ZERO;
for(int k = 0 ; k <= K ; k++) {
// number of graphs with n nodes and k edges
BigInteger num = new BigInteger( answer(n, k) );
// number of graphs with N-n nodes and K-k edges
BigInteger num2 = new BigInteger( answer(N-n, K-k) );
graphs = graphs.add( num.multiply(num2) );
}
// number of ways to choose n nodes from N nodes
BigInteger choose = choose(N, n);
// this is repeated for each of the n chosen nodes
// and the N-n unchosen nodes
choose = choose.multiply(BigInteger.valueOf(n)).multiply(BigInteger.valueOf(N-n));
totalGraphs = totalGraphs.add( choose.multiply(graphs) );
}
// now, consider the case where N = 20
// when n = 2, we compute for N-n = 18
// when n = 18, we do the same thing again
// hence, contents of totalGraphs is 2 times
// of what it should be
return totalGraphs.divide(BigInteger.valueOf(2));
}
这个代码,我打算像Python一样运行,在工作java代码[diffchecker]
方面失败了多个案例如果能得到一些指导,我将非常感激。
答案 0 :(得分:1)
问题出在Java代码中,而不是Python代码(我怀疑是溢出;一些细致的调试证明不是。它不是最简单的比较数字,有20个奇数)。
错误的代码:
/* for the case where K = N-1 */
// Cayley's formula applies [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cayley's_formula].
// number of trees on n labeled vertices is n^{n-2}.
if(K == N-1)
return BigInteger.valueOf((long)Math.pow(N, N-2)).toString();
对于N&gt; = 17,(long)Math.pow(N, N-2)
不准确。发生这种情况是因为双值越大,连续值之间的差距就越大。 double不能代表其范围内的每个整数值,而且这里的错误是什么。它将最接近的double值返回到确切的结果。此外,对于双值,尾数是52位,大致等于16(?)小数位。因此溢出(实际上不是一个字)。
因此,返回的值小于应有的值。不得不用以下代码块替换它。
if(K == N-1) {
if(N < 2)
return BigInteger.valueOf((long)Math.pow(N, N-2)).toString();
// multiply N to itself N-2 times
BigInteger val = BigInteger.ONE;
int count = 0;
while(count++ != N-2)
val = val.multiply( BigInteger.valueOf( (long)N ) );
return val.toString();
}