我有一个用XNA(Monogame)编写的等距瓷砖引擎。它只能绘制瓷砖地图表面。但是当我有更大的地图(例如50x50瓷砖)时,则非常慢(大约15 FPS)。当我有小地图(例如10x10瓷砖)时,framrate是完美的(60 FPS)。
我正试图找到如何优化我的代码的方法,但我不知道该怎么做。
这是我的代码:
using Microsoft.Xna.Framework;
using Microsoft.Xna.Framework.Graphics;
using Microsoft.Xna.Framework.Input;
using Microsoft.Xna.Framework.Input.Touch;
using System;
namespace IsoEngine
{
public class Game1 : Game
{
GraphicsDeviceManager _graphics;
SpriteBatch _spriteBatch;
Texture2D Tile1;
Texture2D Tile2;
MouseState mouseState;
bool isMousePressed = false;
int[,] map = { {1, 1, 1, 1},
{1, 0, 0, 1},
{1, 0, 0, 1},
{1, 1, 1, 1} };
int tileWidth = 64;
int tileHeight = 32;
Vector2 scrollSpan = new Vector2(0, 0);
Vector2 mouseDragPos = new Vector2(0, 0);
public Game1()
{
_graphics = new GraphicsDeviceManager(this);
Content.RootDirectory = "Content";
}
protected override void Initialize()
{
base.IsMouseVisible = true;
base.Initialize();
}
protected override void LoadContent()
{
_spriteBatch = new SpriteBatch(GraphicsDevice);
Tile1 = Content.Load<Texture2D>("1");
Tile2 = Content.Load<Texture2D>("2");
}
protected override void UnloadContent()
{
}
protected override void Update(GameTime gameTime)
{
mouseState = Mouse.GetState();
if (mouseState.LeftButton == ButtonState.Pressed && !isMousePressed)
{
isMousePressed = true;
mouseDragPos.X = mouseState.X;
mouseDragPos.Y = mouseState.Y;
}
if (mouseState.LeftButton == ButtonState.Pressed && isMousePressed)
{
if (mouseDragPos.X < mouseState.X)
{
scrollSpan.X += mouseState.X - mouseDragPos.X;
mouseDragPos.X = mouseState.X;
}
if (mouseDragPos.X > mouseState.X)
{
scrollSpan.X -= mouseDragPos.X - mouseState.X;
mouseDragPos.X = mouseState.X;
}
if (mouseDragPos.Y < mouseState.Y)
{
scrollSpan.Y += (mouseState.Y - mouseDragPos.Y) * 2;
mouseDragPos.Y = mouseState.Y;
}
if (mouseDragPos.Y > mouseState.Y)
{
scrollSpan.Y -= (mouseDragPos.Y - mouseState.Y) * 2;
mouseDragPos.Y = mouseState.Y;
}
}
if (mouseState.LeftButton == ButtonState.Released && isMousePressed)
isMousePressed = false;
base.Update(gameTime);
}
protected override void Draw(GameTime gameTime)
{
GraphicsDevice.Clear(Color.Black);
_spriteBatch.Begin();
DrawMap();
_spriteBatch.End();
base.Draw(gameTime);
}
private void DrawMap()
{
for (int osaY = 0; osaY < map.GetLength(0); osaY++)
{
for (int osaX = 0; osaX < map.GetLength(1); osaX++)
{
int x = osaX * 32;
int y = osaY * 32;
Texture2D thisTile = Tile1;
if (map[osaY, osaX] == 0)
thisTile = Tile1;
if (map[osaY, osaX] == 1)
thisTile = Tile2;
PlaceTile(thisTile, CartToIso(new Vector2(x, y)), new Vector2(osaX, osaY));
}
}
}
public void PlaceTile(Texture2D tileImage, Vector2 tilePos, Vector2 tileCoords)
{
_spriteBatch.Draw(tileImage, new Vector2(tilePos.X - (tileWidth / 2), tilePos.Y - tileHeight), Color.White);
}
public Vector2 CartToIso(Vector2 cartCoords)
{
Vector2 isoCoords = new Vector2(0, 0);
isoCoords.X = (cartCoords.X + scrollSpan.X) - cartCoords.Y;
isoCoords.Y = (cartCoords.X + scrollSpan.Y + cartCoords.Y) / 2;
return isoCoords;
}
public Vector2 IsoToCart(Vector2 isoCoords)
{
Vector2 cartCoords = new Vector2(0, 0);
cartCoords.X = (2 * isoCoords.Y + isoCoords.X - scrollSpan.X - scrollSpan.Y) / 2;
cartCoords.Y = (2 * isoCoords.Y - isoCoords.X + scrollSpan.X - scrollSpan.Y) / 2;
return cartCoords;
}
}
}
答案 0 :(得分:1)
我建议你看看我刚才写的一个答案,它确实只绘制了一个级别中唯一可见的部分,无论级别有多大:
我没有在我写这篇文章的时候复制和粘贴答案,所以去看看吧:
答案 1 :(得分:0)
通常,要提高性能,请避免创建unessesary对象,也不要做任何你不需要的事情。例如,你在DrawMap()中创建一个无用的局部纹理,也可以为方法PlaceTile单个调用创建3个新向量,同时需要one.etc。另请注意,这些只是次要改进
加速的另一种方法可能是使用缓冲区(不确定XNA的默认值)
但最重要的是,尽可能并行化。
答案 2 :(得分:0)
在执行任何其他操作之前,请对您的代码进行分析,并查看花费最多时间的位置。只有这样才能开始优化