我有这个Bin Packing代码:
Public Class Cortar
Private _Cortes() As Integer
Public BarrasCortes()() As Integer
Private _TamanhoBarra As Integer = 100
Public Property TamanhoBarra() As Integer
Get
Return _TamanhoBarra
End Get
Set(ByVal Value As Integer)
_TamanhoBarra = Value
End Set
End Property
Public Property Cortes() As Integer()
Get
Return _Cortes
End Get
Set(ByVal Value As Integer())
_Cortes = Value
End Set
End Property
Public Sub MelhorCorte()
'Checks to make sure everything is initialized
If Cortes Is Nothing Then Exit Sub
Dim CortesCopy(Cortes.GetUpperBound(0)) As Integer
ReDim BarrasCortes(0)
'Bin Number we are on, Bin Element we are on, Amount placed in the current Bin
Dim BinNumber, BinElement, BinCount As Integer
Dim BestBin, BestBinAmount As Integer
Dim i, j, k As Integer
'Make a copy of the array incase we need to sort it
DeepCopyArray(Cortes, CortesCopy)
'Declare the first element in the first Bin
ReDim BarrasCortes(0)(0)
'Loop through each Element and place in a Bin
For i = 0 To CortesCopy.GetUpperBound(0)
BestBin = -1
BestBinAmount = -1
For j = 0 To BinNumber
BinElement = BarrasCortes(j).GetUpperBound(0)
'Count the amount placed in this Bin
BinCount = 0
For k = 0 To BinElement
BinCount += BarrasCortes(j)(k)
Next
'Find the most full Bin that can hold this Element
If BestBinAmount < BinCount AndAlso BinCount + CortesCopy(i) <= Me.TamanhoBarra Then
BestBinAmount = BinCount
BestBin = j
End If
Next
If BestBin = -1 Then
'There wasn't room for the Element in any existing Bin
'Create a new Bin
ReDim Preserve BarrasCortes(BinNumber + 1)
BinNumber += 1
'Initialize first element of new bin
ReDim BarrasCortes(BinNumber)(1)
BinElement = 0
BarrasCortes(BinNumber)(BinElement) = CortesCopy(i)
Else
'There's room for this Element in an existing Bin
'Place Element in "Best Bin"
BinElement = BarrasCortes(BestBin).GetUpperBound(0)
ReDim Preserve BarrasCortes(BestBin)(BinElement + 1)
BarrasCortes(BestBin)(BinElement) = CortesCopy(i)
End If
Next
'All Cortes have been place, now we go back and remove unused Cortes
For i = 0 To BinNumber
For j = 0 To BarrasCortes(i).GetUpperBound(0)
If BarrasCortes(i)(j) = 0 Then
ReDim Preserve BarrasCortes(i)(j - 1)
End If
Next
Next
GC.Collect()
End Sub
Private Sub DeepCopyArray(ByVal ArrayStart() As Integer, ByVal ArrayEnd() As Integer)
Dim i As Integer
For i = 0 To ArrayStart.GetUpperBound(0)
ArrayEnd(i) = ArrayStart(i)
Next
End Sub
End Class
这很好,但有问题:
如果我在C#中定义:
var obj= new Cortar();
obj.TamanhoBarra = 100;
obj.Cortes = new int[] {48, 48, 26, 26};
obj.MelhorCorte();
int[][] x = obj.BarrasCortes;
结果是:
x[0] = {48,48} //rest 4 to 100 (TamanhoBarra)
x[1] = {26,26} //rest 48 to 100 (TamanhoBarra)
但是,如果我只是将数组中元素的顺序更改为
obj.Cortes = new int[] {48, 26, 48, 26};
结果将是:
x[0] = {48,26,26} //rest 0 to 100 (TamanhoBarra) = best optimization
x[1] = {48} //rest 52 to 100 (TamanhoBarra)
问题是:
如何最佳选择吧?
最佳的不对称是直到最大尺寸的元素之和,而休息时间较少。
在上述情况下很容易。
但如果我有:
obj.Cortes = new int[] {48, 48, 48, 48, 48, 48, 48, 48, 48, 48, 26, 26, 26, 26, 26, 26, 26, 26, 26, 26 };
结果将是:
x[0] = {48,48} //rest 4
x[1] = {48,48} //rest 4
x[2] = {48,48} //rest 4
x[3] = {48,48} //rest 4
x[4] = {48,48} //rest 4
x[5] = {26,26,26} //rest 22
x[6] = {26,26,26} //rest 22
x[7] = {26,26,26} //rest 22
x[8] = {26} //rest 74
很多酒吧和全部损失
但如果我像这样排列数组:
obj.Cortes = new int[] {48, 26, 26, 48, 26, 26, 48, 26, 26, 48, 26, 26, 48, 26, 26, 48, 48, 48, 48, 48 };
结果是:
x[0] = {48,26,26} //rest 0
x[1] = {48,26,26} //rest 0
x[2] = {48,26,26} //rest 0
x[3] = {48,26,26} //rest 0
x[4] = {48,26,26} //rest 0
x[5] = {48,48} //rest 4
x[6] = {48,48} //rest 4
x[7] = {48} //rest 52
这是最好的解决方案!
有什么想法吗?
答案 0 :(得分:0)
只需少量商品即可尝试。然后你可以尝试动态编程。