我有经典的简单照明示例：
precision mediump float;
varying vec3 lighting;
attribute vec3 vertex;
attribute vec3 normal;
uniform mat4 mvMatrix, pMatrix, nMatrix;
void main() {
gl_Position = pMatrix * mvMatrix * vec4(vertex,1.0);
vec3 ambientLight = vec3(0.6,0.6,0.6);
vec3 lightColour = vec3(0.5,0.5,0.75);
vec3 lightDir = vec3(0.85,0.8,0.75);
vec3 transformed = (nMatrix * vec4(normal,1.0)).xyz;
float directional = max(dot(transformed,lightDir),0.0);
lighting = ambientLight + (lightColour*directional);
}
precision mediump float;
varying vec3 lighting;
void main() {
gl_FragColor = vec4(lighting,1.0);
}
此代码来自Mozilla webGL example。
我的法线似乎是正确的（如果我绘制原始法线而不是计算颜色，我得到一个漂亮的彩虹）。但是，我计算出的光线对于所有点都是相同的颜色。
我认为这是我的法线矩阵是错误的。我正在计算它：
pMatrix = createPerspective(60.0,canvas.offsetWidth/canvas.offsetHeight,0.1,4),
mvMatrix = createLookAt([2,2,2],[0,0,0],[0,1,0]),
nMatrix = mat4_inverse(mvMatrix);
作为webGL，我不得不制作自己的小矩阵助手（OpenGL使用转置矩阵）：
function createPerspective(fovy,aspect,near,far) {
var top = near*Math.tan(fovy*Math.PI/360.0);
var right = top*aspect, left = -right, bottom = -top;
var rl = (right-left);
var tb = (top-bottom);
var fn = (far-near);
return [(near*2)/rl, 0, 0, 0,
0, (near*2)/tb, 0, 0,
(right+left)/rl, (top+bottom)/tb, -(far+near)/fn, -1,
0, 0, -(far*near*2)/fn, 0];
}
function createLookAt(eye,centre,up) {
if (eye[0] == centre[0] && eye[1] == centre[1] && eye[2] == centre[2])
return [1, 0, 0, 0,
0, 1, 0, 0,
0, 0, 1, 0,
0, 0, 0, 1];
var z0,z1,z2,x0,x1,x2,y0,y1,y2,len;
//vec3.direction(eye, center, z);
z0 = eye[0] - centre[0];
z1 = eye[1] - centre[1];
z2 = eye[2] - centre[2];
// normalize (no check needed for 0 because of early return)
len = 1/Math.sqrt(z0*z0 + z1*z1 + z2*z2);
z0 *= len;
z1 *= len;
z2 *= len;
//vec3.normalize(vec3.cross(up, z, x));
x0 = up[1]*z2 - up[2]*z1;
x1 = up[2]*z0 - up[0]*z2;
x2 = up[0]*z1 - up[1]*z0;
len = Math.sqrt(x0*x0 + x1*x1 + x2*x2);
if(len) len = 1/len; else len = 0;
x0 *= len;
x1 *= len;
x2 *= len;
//vec3.normalize(vec3.cross(z, x, y));
y0 = z1*x2 - z2*x1;
y1 = z2*x0 - z0*x2;
y2 = z0*x1 - z1*x0;
len = Math.sqrt(y0*y0 + y1*y1 + y2*y2);
if(len) len = 1/len; else len = 0;
y0 *= len;
y1 *= len;
y2 *= len;
return [x0, y0, z0, 0,
x1, y1, z1, 0,
x2, y2, z2, 0,
-(x0*eye[0] + x1*eye[1] + x2*eye[2]), -(y0*eye[0] + y1*eye[1] + y2*eye[2]), -(z0*eye[0] + z1*eye[1] + z2*eye[2]), 1];
}
function mat4_inverse(mat) {
var a00 = mat[0], a01 = mat[1], a02 = mat[2], a03 = mat[3];
var a10 = mat[4], a11 = mat[5], a12 = mat[6], a13 = mat[7];
var a20 = mat[8], a21 = mat[9], a22 = mat[10], a23 = mat[11];
var a30 = mat[12], a31 = mat[13], a32 = mat[14], a33 = mat[15];
var b00 = a00*a11 - a01*a10;
var b01 = a00*a12 - a02*a10;
var b02 = a00*a13 - a03*a10;
var b03 = a01*a12 - a02*a11;
var b04 = a01*a13 - a03*a11;
var b05 = a02*a13 - a03*a12;
var b06 = a20*a31 - a21*a30;
var b07 = a20*a32 - a22*a30;
var b08 = a20*a33 - a23*a30;
var b09 = a21*a32 - a22*a31;
var b10 = a21*a33 - a23*a31;
var b11 = a22*a33 - a23*a32;
var invDet = 1/(b00*b11 - b01*b10 + b02*b09 + b03*b08 - b04*b07 + b05*b06);
return [
(a11*b11 - a12*b10 + a13*b09)*invDet,
(-a01*b11 + a02*b10 - a03*b09)*invDet,
(a31*b05 - a32*b04 + a33*b03)*invDet,
(-a21*b05 + a22*b04 - a23*b03)*invDet,
(-a10*b11 + a12*b08 - a13*b07)*invDet,
(a00*b11 - a02*b08 + a03*b07)*invDet,
(-a30*b05 + a32*b02 - a33*b01)*invDet,
(a20*b05 - a22*b02 + a23*b01)*invDet,
(a10*b10 - a11*b08 + a13*b06)*invDet,
(-a00*b10 + a01*b08 - a03*b06)*invDet,
(a30*b04 - a31*b02 + a33*b00)*invDet,
(-a20*b04 + a21*b02 - a23*b00)*invDet,
(-a10*b09 + a11*b07 - a12*b06)*invDet,
(a00*b09 - a01*b07 + a02*b06)*invDet,
(-a30*b03 + a31*b01 - a32*b00)*invDet,
(a20*b03 - a21*b01 + a22*b00)*invDet];
}
我相信这些矩阵函数是正确的 - 因为我之前没有遇到过它们的问题。
所以我有一个关于gluLookAt矩阵没有正交并且弄乱法线矩阵的唠叨记忆，但我在谷歌上找不到任何特别的东西，或者发现我犯了什么根本错误或错误。
如何计算和应用正确的法线矩阵？
答案 0 :(得分：2)
法线矩阵应该是模型视图矩阵的转置的倒数，即
nMatrix = mat4_inverse(mat4_transpose(mvMatrix));