我搜索得很远,但似乎无法想象这个非常基本的东西。我已经在一年或两年前看过stackoverflow和其他地方的其他例子,但他们无法使用最新版本的Three.js。
以下是我正在处理的版本:http://medschoolgunners.com/sandbox/3d/。
我试图让灰色圆锥与未标记的红色矢量完全对齐。 IE浏览器。我希望锥体的尖端与矢量精确对齐,并指向该方向的原点。
以下是我现在的代码:
//FUNCTION TO CREATE A CYLINDER
function create_cylinder(radiusTop,radiusBottom, height, segmentsRadius, segmentsHeight, openEnded, color)
{
var material = new THREE.MeshLambertMaterial({
color: color, //0x0000ff
opacity: 0.2
});
var cylinder = new THREE.Mesh(new THREE.CylinderGeometry(radiusTop,radiusBottom, height, segmentsRadius, segmentsHeight, openEnded), material);
cylinder.overdraw = true;
return cylinder;
}
//ALIGN THE CYLINDER TO A GIVEN VECTOR
var alignVector=new THREE.Vector3(-50,50,50); //the vector to be aligned with
var newcylinder = create_cylinder(0.1, 10, 40, 50, 50, false, "0x0ff0f0"); // the object to be aligned with the vector above
var cylinderQuaternion = new THREE.Quaternion();
cylinderQuaternion.setFromEuler(alignVector);
newcylinder.useQuaternion = true;
newcylinder.quaternion=cylinderQuaternion;
scatterPlot.add(newcylinder);
答案 0 :(得分:23)
如果您有任意向量:
var vector = new THREE.Vector3(100, 60, 20);
您可以将对象(如圆柱体)与向量对齐,如下所示:
var geometry = new THREE.CylinderGeometry(2, 2, vector.length(), 4, 4);
var mesh = new THREE.Mesh(geometry, someMaterial);
var axis = new THREE.Vector3(0, 1, 0);
mesh.quaternion.setFromUnitVectors(axis, vector.clone().normalize());
其中axis
是圆柱体的原始方向(朝上)。
你也可以移动圆柱体以匹配矢量的位置,如下所示:
mesh.position.copy(vector.clone().multiplyScalar(0.5));
这会将圆柱的一端放在0, 0, 0
而另一端放在100, 60, 20
,因为我将圆柱长度设置为vector.length()
。
答案 1 :(得分:7)
我知道这是一个老问题,但万一有人还在想,对我来说有用的是将矢量添加到网格位置并使用lookAt将其与矢量对齐:
//Mesh to align
var material = new THREE.MeshLambertMaterial({color: 0x0000ff});
var cylinder = new THREE.Mesh(new THREE.CylinderGeometry(10, 10, 15), material);
//vector to align to
var vector = new THREE.Vector3(
5,//x
10,//y
15 //z
);
//create a point to lookAt
var focalPoint = new THREE.Vector3(
cylinder.position.x + vector.x,
cylinder.position.y + vector.y,
cylinder.position.z + vector.z
);
//all that remains is setting the up vector (if needed) and use lookAt
cylinder.up = new THREE.Vector3(0,0,1);//Z axis up
cylinder.lookAt(focalPoint);
答案 2 :(得分:3)
不幸的是我没有使用Quaternions,所以无济于事。在我看来,需要一些补偿,因为圆柱体的枢轴位于网格的中心,而不是一端。
如果稍微使用矩阵,我会得到不错的结果。
这是一种方法,使用Mesh的lookAt()方法:
var HALF_PI = -Math.PI * .5;
var p1 = new THREE.Vector3(Math.random()-.5,Math.random()-.5,Math.random()-.5).multiplyScalar(30);
var p2 = new THREE.Vector3(Math.random(),Math.random(),Math.random()).multiplyScalar(300);
var halfLength = diff.length() * .5;
var c = new THREE.CylinderGeometry(10, 10, halfLength * 2, 12, 1, false );
var orientation = new THREE.Matrix4();
orientation.setRotationFromEuler(new THREE.Vector3(HALF_PI,0,0));//rotate on X 90 degrees
orientation.setPosition(new THREE.Vector3(0,0,halfLength));//move half way on Z, since default pivot is at centre
c.applyMatrix(orientation);//apply transformation for geometry
var m = new THREE.Mesh( c, new THREE.MeshLambertMaterial( { color: 0x009900, wireframe: true, shading: THREE.FlatShading } ) );
scene.add(m);
m.lookAt(p2);//tell mesh to orient itself towards p2
//just for debugging - to illustrate orientation
m.add(new THREE.Axes());
//visualize p1,p2 vectors
var PI2 = Math.PI * 2;
var program = function ( context ) {
context.beginPath();
context.arc( 0, 0, 1, 0, PI2, true );
context.closePath();
context.fill();
}
particleMaterial = new THREE.ParticleCanvasMaterial( { color: 0x990000, program: program } );
var pp1 = new THREE.Particle( new THREE.ParticleCanvasMaterial( { color: 0x990000, program: program } ) );
pp1.scale.multiplyScalar(10);
pp1.position.copy(p1);
scene.add( pp1 );
var pp2 = new THREE.Particle( new THREE.ParticleCanvasMaterial( { color: 0x009900, program: program } ) );
pp2.scale.multiplyScalar(10);
pp2.position.copy(p2);
scene.add( pp2 );
这应绘制一个从p1开始,以p2结束并朝向它的圆柱体。 偏移可能需要一些调整,但几何跟随矢量方向非常接近。
还有更长版本的手动计算矩阵,而不是依赖于lookAt()功能:
plane.add(getCylinderBetweenPoints(p1,p2,new THREE.MeshLambertMaterial( { color: 0x009900, wireframe: true, shading: THREE.FlatShading } )));
function getCylinderBetweenPoints(point1,point2,material){
var HALF_PI = -Math.PI * .5;
var diff = new THREE.Vector3().sub(point1,point2);//delta vector
var halfLength = diff.length() * .5;
var c = new THREE.CylinderGeometry(10, 10, halfLength * 2, 12, 1, false );
var orientation = new THREE.Matrix4();//a new orientation matrix to offset pivot
var offsetRotation = new THREE.Matrix4();//a matrix to fix pivot rotation
var offsetPosition = new THREE.Matrix4();//a matrix to fix pivot position
orientation.lookAt(point1,point2,new THREE.Vector3(0,1,0));//look at destination
offsetRotation.setRotationX(HALF_PI);//rotate 90 degs on X
offsetPosition.setPosition(new THREE.Vector3(-point1.x,diff.length()*.5+point1.z,point1.y*.5));//move by pivot offset on Y
orientation.multiplySelf(offsetRotation);//combine orientation with rotation transformations
orientation.multiplySelf(offsetPosition);//combine orientation with position transformations
c.applyMatrix(orientation);//apply the final matrix
var m = new THREE.Mesh( c, material );
m.add(new THREE.Axes());
return m;
}
var PI2 = Math.PI * 2;
var program = function ( context ) {
context.beginPath();
context.arc( 0, 0, 1, 0, PI2, true );
context.closePath();
context.fill();
}
//visualize p1,p2 vectors
particleMaterial = new THREE.ParticleCanvasMaterial( { color: 0x990000, program: program } );
var pp1 = new THREE.Particle( new THREE.ParticleCanvasMaterial( { color: 0x990000, program: program } ) );
pp1.scale.multiplyScalar(10);
pp1.position.copy(p1);
plane.add( pp1 );
var pp2 = new THREE.Particle( new THREE.ParticleCanvasMaterial( { color: 0x009900, program: program } ) );
pp2.scale.multiplyScalar(10);
pp2.position.copy(p2);
plane.add( pp2 );
这看起来比使用四元数更多的工作,从我在你的代码中看到的。如果setFromEuler为方向做了魔术,网格的几何体仍然可能需要移动(从一端而不是中心枢转)
HTH