我在Solaris 10上运行Java 1.5。 我的程序是一个独立的java程序,使用java并发包和log4j-1.2.12.jar来记录某些信息。主要逻辑如下
ExecutorService executor = new AppThreadPoolExecutor(10, 10, 0L, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS, new LinkedBlockingQueue<Runnable>(Integer.MAX_VALUE), new AppThreadFactory("BSRT", true), new ThreadPoolExecutor.CallerRunsPolicy());
CompletionService<Integer> completionService = new ExecutorCompletionService<Integer>(executor);
for (final Integer id : taskList) {
Callable<Integer> c = new Callable<Integer>() {
public Integer call() throws Exception {
int newId = DB operation(id);
return newId;
}
};
completionService.submit(c);
}
logger.debug("Start retrievie result");
for (Integer id : taskList) {
try {
Future<Integer> future = completionService.poll(1, TimeUnit.SECONDS);
Integer taskId=null;
if (future != null) {
logger.debug("future is obtained.");
taskId = future.get();
} else {
logger.error("wait too long and get nothing!");
break;
}
if (taskId != null) {
taskIdList.add(taskId);
}
} catch (ExecutionException ignore) {
// log the cause and ignore this aborted task,coninue with
// next available task.
logger.warn(ignore.getCause());
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
logger.warn("interrupted...");
// Re-assert the thread’s interrupted status
Thread.currentThread().interrupt();
}
}executor.shutdown();
在我的程序执行期间,有时(并非总是)我收到此错误...
executor.shutdown();
从通话super.run();
返回后,将无法中断AppThread
因为woker已经从ThreadPoolExecutor
内部使用的工作集中删除了,所以执行者从那时起就没有引用AppThread。
btw:日志文件可以访问,大小足够大。
log4j:ERROR Failed to flush writer,
java.io.InterruptedIOException
at java.io.FileOutputStream.writeBytes(Native Method)
at java.io.FileOutputStream.write(FileOutputStream.java:260)
at sun.nio.cs.StreamEncoder$CharsetSE.writeBytes(StreamEncoder.java:336)
at sun.nio.cs.StreamEncoder$CharsetSE.implFlushBuffer(StreamEncoder.java:404)
at sun.nio.cs.StreamEncoder$CharsetSE.implFlush(StreamEncoder.java:408)
at sun.nio.cs.StreamEncoder.flush(StreamEncoder.java:152)
at java.io.OutputStreamWriter.flush(OutputStreamWriter.java:213)
at org.apache.log4j.helpers.QuietWriter.flush(QuietWriter.java:57)
at org.apache.log4j.WriterAppender.subAppend(WriterAppender.java:315)
at org.apache.log4j.DailyRollingFileAppender.subAppend(DailyRollingFileAppender.java:358)
at org.apache.log4j.WriterAppender.append(WriterAppender.java:159)
at org.apache.log4j.AppenderSkeleton.doAppend(AppenderSkeleton.java:230)
at org.apache.log4j.helpers.AppenderAttachableImpl.appendLoopOnAppenders(AppenderAttachableImpl.java:65)
at org.apache.log4j.Category.callAppenders(Category.java:203)
at org.apache.log4j.Category.forcedLog(Category.java:388)
at org.apache.log4j.Category.debug(Category.java:257)
at AppThread.run( AppThread.java: 33)
33是一行:if (debug)
logger.info("Exiting " + getName());
import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicInteger;
import org.apache.log4j.Logger;
public class AppThread extends Thread {
public static final String DEFAULT_NAME = "MyAppThread";
private static volatile boolean debugLifecycle = false;
private static final AtomicInteger created = new AtomicInteger();
private static final AtomicInteger alive = new AtomicInteger();
private static final Logger logger = Logger.getLogger(AppThread.class);
private boolean dump = false;
public AppThread(Runnable r) {
this(r, DEFAULT_NAME);
}
public AppThread(Runnable runnable, String name) {
super(runnable, name + "-" + created.incrementAndGet());
logger.debug(name + "'s constructor running");
}
public void interrupt() {
if (!dump) {
super.interrupt();
}
if (dump) {
logger.debug("interrupt : " + getName() + " <<<");
Thread.dumpStack();
logger.debug("interrupt : " + getName() + " >>>");
}
}
public void run() {
boolean debug = debugLifecycle;
if (debug)
logger.info("Created " + getName());
try {
alive.incrementAndGet();
super.run();
logger.debug("running!");
} finally {
alive.decrementAndGet();
dump = true;
try {
Thread.sleep(100000);
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
logger.debug(e);
}
if (debug)
logger.info("Exiting " + getName());
}
}
public static int getThreadsCreated() {
return created.get();
}
public static int getThreadsAlive() {
return alive.get();
}
public static boolean getDebug() {
return debugLifecycle;
}
public static void setDebug(boolean b) {
debugLifecycle = b;
}
}
另一个问题是,为了调试java.io.InterruptedIOException
的原因,我添加了
try {
Thread.sleep(100000);
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
logger.debug(e);
}
在AppThread的run
方法的finally子句中。当在finally子句中捕获InterruptedException
时,永远不会调用覆盖interrupt()
方法。谁中断了AppThread?因java.io.InterruptedIOException
而导致同一个人?
答案 0 :(得分:7)
是:
执行shutdownNow 尝试停止所有正在执行的任务,停止等待任务的处理,并返回等待执行的任务列表。
除了尽力尝试停止处理主动执行任务之外,没有任何保证。例如,典型的实现将通过Thread.interrupt() 取消,因此任何无法响应中断的任务都可能永远不会终止。
只需使用shutdown()
代替shutdownNow()
。当您强行调用shutdownNow()
时,这是您应该期望的 - JVM会优雅地中断I / O并尽快关闭线程。
但是我会确保日志记录不是应用程序的瓶颈。只需在程序执行期间进行一些线程转储,并查看线程写入或等待I / O的频率。穷人的表现。
答案 1 :(得分:1)
中断工作线程实际上是Executor
框架的功能,允许工作线程在被要求通过interrupt()
时正常关闭。它记录了shutdownNow()
的行为。
如果您不想这样做,请致电shutdown()
- 它不会interrupt()
您的工作线程,Executor
将停止接受新任务。
答案 2 :(得分:0)
我有类似的问题。
我的研究到目前为止Thread.interrupt()
设置了中断标志。这导致Java堆栈深处的IO操作中断。但IO方法通常不会被声明为抛出InterruptedException
。
而是抛出InterruptedIOException
并清除线程的中断状态!。如果您编写了一个期望(捕获)IOException
的工作者,则必须单独捕获InterruptedIOException
并在catch子句中调用Thead.currentThread().interrupt()
。