如何根据多种条件过滤数据?

时间:2020-07-07 12:42:46

标签: javascript arrays data-structures ecmascript-6 javascript-objects

好的,所以我有一个对象数组,这是我要过滤的数据:

const posts = [
{
 hairday: '2',
 products: ['product1', 'product2', 'product3', 'product4'],
 rating: '2',
 drying: 'diffuser'
},
{
 hairday: '2',
 products: ['product6', 'product7', 'product8', 'product9'],
 rating: '4',
 drying: 'air dry'
},
{
 hairday: '3',
 products: ['product10', 'product11', 'product13', 'product14'],
 rating: '3',
 drying: 'air dry'
},
{
 hairday: '4',
 products: ['product15', 'product26', 'product37', 'product14'],
 rating: '5',
 drying: 'towel dry'
},
]

我想按多种条件过滤以上数据。这是条件的示例对象:

{
 products: ['product1', 'product13'],
 hairday: ['2', '3'],
 drying: ['air dry', 'diffuser'],
 rating: []
}

所以我想获得所有与每个数组中至少一项匹配的post对象。

因此,过滤后的物品应具有product1或product13和hairday 2或hairday 3并干燥风干或干燥扩散器和任何等级。

解决此问题的最佳方法是什么?筛选器对象的结构是否最佳? 在此先感谢<3

2 个答案:

答案 0 :(得分:1)

对于不需要手动列出键的更健壮的解决方案,可以使用Object.keys()遍历条件对象,然后将post数组中的各个对象与其进行比较:< / p>

const filtered = posts.filter(post => {
  const conditionKeys = Object.keys(conditions);
  const fulfillments = conditionKeys.map(k => {
    const condition = conditions[k];
    
    // If we encounter an empty array, then criteria is always met
    if (condition.length === 0) {
      return true;
    }
    
    // Enforces that as long as ONE subcondition is met (`OR`)
    return condition.filter(v => post[k].includes(v)).length > 0;
  });
  
  // Enforce that EVERY condition must be met (`AND`)
  // A condition is considered met as long as it is true
  return fulfillments.every(x => x);
});

在遍历各个条件(工作日,产品等)时,我们只想检查您的对象是否包含一个或多个列出的值(即两个数组中的任何一个都相交)。如果存在交叉点,则长度将> 0,否则将为0。

请参见下面的概念验证:

const posts = [{
    hairday: '2',
    products: ['product1', 'product2', 'product3', 'product4'],
    rating: '2',
    drying: 'diffuser'
  },
  {
    hairday: '2',
    products: ['product6', 'product7', 'product8', 'product9'],
    rating: '4',
    drying: 'air dry'
  },
  {
    hairday: '3',
    products: ['product10', 'product11', 'product13', 'product14'],
    rating: '3',
    drying: 'air dry'
  },
  {
    hairday: '4',
    products: ['product15', 'product26', 'product37', 'product14'],
    rating: '5',
    drying: 'towel dry'
  },
];

const conditions = {
  products: ['product1', 'product13'],
  hairday: ['2', '3'],
  drying: ['air dry', 'diffuser'],
  rating: []
};

const filtered = posts.filter(post => {
  const fulfillments = Object.keys(conditions).map(k => {
    const condition = conditions[k];
    
    // If we encounter an empty array, then criteria is always met
    if (condition.length === 0) {
      return true;
    }
    
    return condition.filter(v => post[k].includes(v)).length > 0;
  });
  
  return fulfillments.every(x => x);
});

console.log(filtered);

答案 1 :(得分:0)

我可以这样写一个相当通用的版本:

const findMatches = (filters, xs) => 
  xs .filter (x => Object .entries (filters) .every (([name, vals]) =>
    vals.length == 0 ||
    (Array .isArray (x [name])
      ? x [name] .some (val => vals .includes (val))
      : vals .includes (x [name]))
  ))

const posts = [{hairday: '2', products: ['product1', 'product2', 'product3', 'product4'], rating: '2', drying: 'diffuser'}, {hairday: '2', products: ['product6', 'product7', 'product8', 'product9'], rating: '4', drying: 'air dry'}, {hairday: '3', products: ['product10', 'product11', 'product13', 'product14'], rating: '3', drying: 'air dry'}, {hairday: '4', products: ['product15', 'product26', 'product37', 'product14'], rating: '5', drying: 'towel dry'}]
const filters = {products: ['product1', 'product13'], hairday: ['2', '3'], drying: ['air dry', 'diffuser'], rating: []}

console .log (findMatches (filters, posts))
.as-console-wrapper {min-height: 100% !important; top: 0}

代码对帖子,产品,工作日等一无所知。它只是根据条件对象过滤对象列表。

但是,我对此不满意。空数组(ratings)的特殊处理使人感觉这是一个错误的设计。我建议,如果您没有任何匹配的值,则只需在条件对象中不包含它。因此,我们将删除“ ratings1”以获得

const conditions = {
  products: ['product1', 'product13'],
  hairday: ['2', '3'],
  drying: ['air dry', 'diffuser'],
};

对我来说,从其他条件来看,从本质上讲,这更合乎逻辑,即对象中的值必须是给定列表之一(或者在数组的情况下,元素之一必须是给定列表之一)给定列表)。空的ratings对象可以解决这个问题。

这会将代码稍微简化为

const findMatches = (filters, xs) => 
  xs .filter (x => Object .entries (filters) .every (([name, vals]) =>
    Array .isArray (x [name])
      ? x [name] .some (val => vals .includes (val))
      : vals .includes (x [name])
  ))

这些版本的效率低下。我们为每个x [name]获取两次x,这可能没什么大不了的,但是我们也为每个值在Object .entries上调用了filters。如果该功能成为您应用程序中的瓶颈,则您可能需要修复它们。此版本可以清理它们,还可以使您在给定的条件下创建可重用的功能:

const findMatches = (filters) => {
  const toMatch = Object .entries (filters)
  return (xs) => 
    xs .filter (x => toMatch .every (([name, vals]) => {
      const val = x [name]
      return Array .isArray (val)
        ? val .some (val => vals .includes (val))
        : vals .includes (val)
    }))
}

您可能会略有不同:

const myFilter = findMatches (filters)
// ... later
console .log (myFilter (posts))

但是我不会打扰的,除非事实证明这是应用程序的瓶颈,这似乎不太可能。第一个版本(最好是第二个版本)要干净得多。