[注意:如果重要,我使用的是3.1。另外,我在codereview上问了这个问题,但到目前为止还没有回复。]
我需要一个运算符来允许布尔流作为另一个流的门(当门流为真时让值传递,当它为假时丢弃它们)。我通常会使用Switch,但如果源流是冷的,它将继续重新创建它,这是我不想要的。
我也想在自己之后进行清理,以便在源或门完成时结果完成。
public static IObservable<T> When<T>(this IObservable<T> source, IObservable<bool> gate)
{
var s = source.Publish().RefCount();
var g = gate.Publish().RefCount();
var sourceCompleted = s.TakeLast(1).DefaultIfEmpty().Select(_ => Unit.Default);
var gateCompleted = g.TakeLast(1).DefaultIfEmpty().Select(_ => Unit.Default);
var anyCompleted = Observable.Amb(sourceCompleted, gateCompleted);
var flag = false;
g.TakeUntil(anyCompleted).Subscribe(value => flag = value);
return s.Where(_ => flag).TakeUntil(anyCompleted);
}
除了整体冗长之外,我不喜欢我订阅门,即使结果从未订阅(在这种情况下,此运算符应该是无操作)。有没有办法摆脱那个订阅?
我也试过这个实现,但是在自我清理后更糟糕的是:
return Observable.Create<T>(
o =>
{
var flag = false;
gate.Subscribe(value => flag = value);
return source.Subscribe(
value =>
{
if (flag) o.OnNext(value);
});
});
这些是我用来检查实现的测试:
[TestMethod]
public void TestMethod1()
{
var output = new List<int>();
var source = new Subject<int>();
var gate = new Subject<bool>();
var result = source.When(gate);
result.Subscribe(output.Add, () => output.Add(-1));
// the gate starts with false, so the source events are ignored
source.OnNext(1);
source.OnNext(2);
source.OnNext(3);
CollectionAssert.AreEqual(new int[0], output);
// setting the gate to true will let the source events pass
gate.OnNext(true);
source.OnNext(4);
CollectionAssert.AreEqual(new[] { 4 }, output);
source.OnNext(5);
CollectionAssert.AreEqual(new[] { 4, 5 }, output);
// setting the gate to false stops source events from propagating again
gate.OnNext(false);
source.OnNext(6);
source.OnNext(7);
CollectionAssert.AreEqual(new[] { 4, 5 }, output);
// completing the source also completes the result
source.OnCompleted();
CollectionAssert.AreEqual(new[] { 4, 5, -1 }, output);
}
[TestMethod]
public void TestMethod2()
{
// completing the gate also completes the result
var output = new List<int>();
var source = new Subject<int>();
var gate = new Subject<bool>();
var result = source.When(gate);
result.Subscribe(output.Add, () => output.Add(-1));
gate.OnCompleted();
CollectionAssert.AreEqual(new[] { -1 }, output);
}
答案 0 :(得分:2)
更新:当门终止时终止。我在复制/粘贴中错过了TestMethod2
:
return gate.Publish(_gate => source
.WithLatestFrom(_gate.StartWith(false), (value, b) => (value, b))
.Where(t => t.b)
.Select(t => t.value)
.TakeUntil(_gate.IgnoreElements().Materialize()
));
这会传递你的测试 TestMethod1
,当门可观察时它不会终止。
public static IObservable<T> When<T>(this IObservable<T> source, IObservable<bool> gate)
{
return source
.WithLatestFrom(gate.StartWith(false), (value, b) => (value, b))
.Where(t => t.b)
.Select(t => t.value);
}
答案 1 :(得分:2)
这有效:
public static IObservable<T> When<T>(this IObservable<T> source, IObservable<bool> gate)
{
return
source.Publish(ss => gate.Publish(gs =>
gs
.Select(g => g ? ss : ss.IgnoreElements())
.Switch()
.TakeUntil(Observable.Amb(
ss.Select(s => true).Materialize().LastAsync(),
gs.Materialize().LastAsync()))));
}
这通过了两个测试。
答案 2 :(得分:1)
您与Observable.Create
走在了正确的轨道上。您应该从observable上的两个订阅中调用onError和onCompleted,以便在需要时正确完成或错误。另外,如果您打算在IDisposable
或Create
完成之前处置When订阅,则通过返回source
委托中的gate
来确保两个订阅都已正确清理
public static IObservable<T> When<T>(this IObservable<T> source, IObservable<bool> gate)
{
return Observable.Create<T>(
o =>
{
var flag = false;
var gs = gate.Subscribe(
value => flag = value,
e => o.OnError(e),
() => o.OnCompleted());
var ss = source.Subscribe(
value =>
{
if (flag) o.OnNext(value);
},
e => o.OnError(e),
() => o.OnCompleted());
return new CompositeDisposable(gs, ss);
});
}
仅使用Rx运算符的更短但更难阅读的版本。对于冷可观测量,它可能需要为源提供发布/引用计数。
public static IObservable<T> When<T>(this IObservable<T> source, IObservable<bool> gate)
{
return gate
.Select(g => g ? source : source.IgnoreElements())
.Switch()
.TakeUntil(source.Materialize()
.Where(s => s.Kind == NotificationKind.OnCompleted));
}