我有一个代码,我正在处理一组3个信号量。我有两套
struct sembuf wait[3],signal[3];
我已经初始化了每一个。 wait初始化为-1,信号初始化为1
然后我使用成功运行的函数semctl(semid,0,SETALL,2);
将其值设置为2。然后我检查它们的值是否已设置,并且它们已设置。
然后我做semop(semid,&wait[1],2);
。这应该等待两个信号量并减少它们的值。所以我希望此时三个信号量的值为2,1,1,但令我惊讶的是它将第一个信号量的值减少两次,我看到值为0,2,2。
有谁能告诉我为什么会这样。
这是我的代码:
#include<stdio.h>
#include<stdlib.h>
#include<sys/sem.h>
#include<sys/ipc.h>
#include<sys/types.h>
#include<string.h>
#include<errno.h>
int main(int argc,char *argv[]){
key_t key1 = 12345;
int semid;
unsigned short *semval;
struct sembuf wait[3],signal[3];
semval = (unsigned short*) malloc(sizeof(unsigned short) * 3);
wait[0].sem_num = 0;
wait[0].sem_op = -1;
wait[0].sem_flg = SEM_UNDO;
signal[0].sem_num = 0;
signal[0].sem_op = 1;
signal[0].sem_flg = SEM_UNDO;
wait[1].sem_num = 0;
wait[1].sem_op = -1;
wait[1].sem_flg = SEM_UNDO;
signal[1].sem_num = 0;
signal[1].sem_op = 1;
signal[1].sem_flg = SEM_UNDO;
wait[2].sem_num = 0;
wait[2].sem_op = -1;
wait[2].sem_flg = SEM_UNDO;
signal[2].sem_num = 0;
signal[2].sem_op = 1;
signal[2].sem_flg = SEM_UNDO;
semid = semget(key1,3,IPC_CREAT);
printf("ALLOCATING THE SEMAPHORES = %s\n",strerror(errno));
semval[0] = semval[1] = semval[2] = 2;
semctl(semid,0,SETALL,semval);
printf("SETTING SEMAPHORE VALUES = %s\n",strerror(errno));
semctl(semid,0,GETALL,semval);
printf("Initialized Semaphore values : %d--%d--%d\n",semval[0],semval[1],semval[2]);
semop(semid,&wait[1],2);
printf("WAITING ON SEMAPHORES 2 AND 3 = %s\n",strerror(errno));
semctl(semid,0,GETALL,semval);
printf("VALUES AFTER WAITING ON SEMAPHORES 2 AND 3 : %d--%d--%d\n",semval[0],semval[1],semval[2]);
semctl(semid,0,IPC_RMID);
printf("SEMAPHORE REMOVED = %s\n",strerror(errno));
return 0;
}
,这是输出
anirudh@anirudh-Aspire-5920:~/Desktop/testing$ gcc -g -o sem3 sem3.c
anirudh@anirudh-Aspire-5920:~/Desktop/testing$ sudo ./sem3
ALLOCATING THE SEMAPHORES = Success
SETTING SEMAPHORE VALUES = Success
Initialized Semaphore values : 2--2--2
WAITING ON SEMAPHORES 2 AND 3 = Success
VALUES AFTER WAITING ON SEMAPHORES 2 AND 3 : 0--2--2
SEMAPHORE REMOVED = Success
最后成功写了一篇博客。 http://systemsdaemon.blogspot.com/2011/02/system-v-semaphores-for-babies.html
答案 0 :(得分:4)
您在所有参数中使用了sem_num = 0.