Ada - BigNum Integers的Long(Grade-School)乘法

时间:2018-04-09 05:33:13

标签: ada multiplication bignum

我正在尝试在Ada中实现Grade-School Multiplication算法,并且我目前正在获得索引超出范围的错误。我很欣赏有关如何修复错误的任何输入,并成功实现了算法。提前谢谢!

我有一个BigNumPkg个包定义type BigNum is array(0..Size - 1) of Integer;

我试图实现的功能目前如下:

FUNCTION "*" (X, Y : BigNum) RETURN BigNum IS
  Product : BigNum:= Zero;
  Carry : Natural := 0;
  Base : Constant Integer := 10;
BEGIN
  FOR I IN REVERSE 0..Size-1 LOOP
     Carry := 0;
     FOR N IN REVERSE 0..Size-1 LOOP
        Product(N + I - 1) := Product(N + I - 1) + Carry + X(N) * Y(I);
        Carry := Product(N + I -1) / Base;
        Product(N + I -1) := Product(N +I-1) mod Base;
     END LOOP;
     Product(I+Size-1) := Product(I+Size-1) + Carry;
  END LOOP;
  RETURN Product;
END "*"; 

2 个答案:

答案 0 :(得分:2)

包装规格:

package Big_Integer is

   Base : constant := 10;
   Size : constant := 3;

   type Extended_Digit is range 0 .. Base * Base;
   subtype Digit is Extended_Digit range 0 .. Base - 1;

   type Instance is array (0 .. Size - 1) of Digit;

   function "*" (Left, Right : in Instance) return Instance;

   function Image (Item : in Instance) return String;

end Big_Integer;

您当然可以根据需要调整参数,但这些对于手动检查结果非常有用。请注意,我并未向自己保证Extended_Digit的范围是正确的,但在这种情况下似乎有效。

包实施:

with Ada.Strings.Unbounded;

package body Big_Integer is

   function "*" (Left, Right : in Instance) return Instance is
      Carry : Extended_Digit := 0;
      Sum   : Extended_Digit;
   begin
      return Product : Instance := (others => 0) do
         for I in Left'Range loop
            for J in Right'Range loop
               if I + J in Product'Range then
                  Sum := Left (I) * Right (J) + Carry + Product (I + J);

                  Product (I + J) := Sum mod Base;
                  Carry           := Sum / Base;
               else
                  Sum := Left (I) * Right (J) + Carry;

                  if Sum = 0 then
                     Carry := 0;
                  else
                     raise Constraint_Error with "Big integer overflow.";
                  end if;
               end if;
            end loop;

            if Carry /= 0 then
               raise Constraint_Error with "Big integer overflow.";
            end if;
         end loop;
      end return;
   end "*";

   function Image (Item : in Instance) return String is
      Buffer : Ada.Strings.Unbounded.Unbounded_String;
   begin
      for E of reverse Item loop
         Ada.Strings.Unbounded.Append (Buffer, Digit'Image (E));
      end loop;

      return Ada.Strings.Unbounded.To_String (Buffer);
   end Image;

end Big_Integer;

测试驱动程序:

with Ada.Text_IO;

with Big_Integer;

procedure Use_Big_Integers is
   use all type Big_Integer.Instance;

   procedure Multiply (A, B : in     Big_Integer.Instance);

   procedure Multiply (A, B : in     Big_Integer.Instance) is
      use Ada.Text_IO;
   begin
      Put (Image (A));
      Put (" * ");
      Put (Image (B));
      Put (" = ");
      Put (Image (A * B));
      New_Line;
   exception
      when Constraint_Error =>
         Put_Line ("Constraint_Error");
   end Multiply;

begin
   Multiply (A => (0 => 1, others => 0),
             B => (others => Big_Integer.Digit'Last));

   Multiply (A => (0 => Big_Integer.Digit'Last, others => 0),
             B => (0 => Big_Integer.Digit'Last, others => 0));

   Multiply (A => (0 => 2, others => 0),
             B => (others => Big_Integer.Digit'Last));

   Multiply (A => (2 => 0, 1 => 1, 0 => 2),
             B => (2 => 0, 1 => 4, 0 => 5));

   Multiply (A => (2 => 0, 1 => 2, 0 => 2),
             B => (2 => 0, 1 => 4, 0 => 5));

   Multiply (A => (2 => 0, 1 => 2, 0 => 3),
             B => (2 => 0, 1 => 4, 0 => 5));
end Use_Big_Integers;

答案 1 :(得分:1)

提供完整的复制品是一种很好的风格,但不要介意......

I将被用作Y的索引时,将循环语句编写为for I in reverse Y'Range ... end loop;是一种很好的方式。同样适用于N

您确定N + I - 1始终是Product的有效索引吗?我很确定你的当前实现可以得到太大和太小的索引。我怀疑太小的索引是算法实现中的一个一个错误。太大的索引是因为你没有清楚地想到如何处理整数溢出(Ada中的传统方式是提升Constraint_Error)。

不应该在函数末尾检查Carry的值吗?