Question

我看到许多人使用这样的格式字符串：

root = "sample"
output = "output"
path = "{}/{}".format(root, output)

而不是简单地连接这样的字符串：

path = root + '/' + output

格式字符串是否具有更好的性能，还是仅仅用于外观？

Answer 1

它只是为了看起来。您可以一目了然地看到格式是什么。我们中的许多人比可读性更好于微优化。

让我们看看IPython %timeit所说的话：

Python 3.7.2 (default, Jan  3 2019, 02:55:40)
IPython 5.8.0
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-4590T CPU @ 2.00GHz

In [1]: %timeit root = "sample"; output = "output"; path = "{}/{}".format(root, output)
The slowest run took 12.44 times longer than the fastest. This could mean that an intermediate result is being cached.
1000000 loops, best of 5: 223 ns per loop

In [2]: %timeit root = "sample"; output = "output"; path = root + '/' + output
The slowest run took 13.82 times longer than the fastest. This could mean that an intermediate result is being cached.
10000000 loops, best of 5: 101 ns per loop

In [3]: %timeit root = "sample"; output = "output"; path = "%s/%s" % (root, output)
The slowest run took 27.97 times longer than the fastest. This could mean that an intermediate result is being cached.
10000000 loops, best of 5: 155 ns per loop

In [4]: %timeit root = "sample"; output = "output"; path = f"{root}/{output}"
The slowest run took 19.52 times longer than the fastest. This could mean that an intermediate result is being cached.
10000000 loops, best of 5: 77.8 ns per loop

Answer 2

与大多数事情一样，会有性能差异，但要问问自己“如果这更快，那真的很重要吗？”。输出root + '/' output方法快捷方便。但是，当您有多个要打印的变量时，这很难快速阅读

foo = "X = " + myX + " | Y = " + someY + " Z = " + Z.toString()

VS

foo = "X = {} | Y= {} | Z = {}".format(myX, someY, Z.toString())

哪个更容易理解发生了什么？除非你真的需要表现出色，否则选择最容易阅读和理解的方式

Answer 3

它不仅适用于＆＃34;外观＆＃34;，还适用于强大的词汇类型转换;它也是国际化的必要条件。

您可以根据所选语言换出格式字符串。

在源代码中加入了一长串字符串连接，这实际上无法正常完成。

Answer 4

字符串格式在绑定数据时没有数据类型。在连接中，我们必须相应地输入或转换数据。

例如：

a = 10
b = "foo"
c = str(a) + " " + b
print c
> 10 foo

可以通过字符串格式化来完成：

a = 10
b = "foo"
c = "{} {}".format(a, b)
print c
> 10 foo

如果使用in-in占位符{} {}，我们假设有两件事情要进一步发展，即在这种情况下，a和b。

Answer 5

我同意格式化主要用于提高可读性，但自从3.6中的f字符串发布以来，表格已经转变为性能。我也认为f字符串更易读/可维护，因为1）它们可以像大多数常规文本一样被左右读取; 2）由于变量是字符串内的，因此避免了连接的间隔相关缺点。 / p>

运行此代码：

from timeit import timeit

runs = 1000000


def print_results(time, start_string):
    print(f'{start_string}\n'
          f'Total: {time:.4f}s\n'
          f'Avg: {(time/runs)*1000000000:.4f}ns\n')


t1 = timeit('"%s, %s" % (greeting, loc)',
            setup='greeting="hello";loc="world"',
            number=runs)
t2 = timeit('f"{greeting}, {loc}"',
            setup='greeting="hello";loc="world"',
            number=runs)
t3 = timeit('greeting + ", " + loc',
            setup='greeting="hello";loc="world"',
            number=runs)
t4 = timeit('"{}, {}".format(greeting, loc)',
            setup='greeting="hello";loc="world"',
            number=runs)

print_results(t1, '% replacement')
print_results(t2, 'f strings')
print_results(t3, 'concatenation')
print_results(t4, '.format method')

在我的机器上产生这个结果：

% replacement
Total: 0.3044s
Avg: 304.3638ns

f strings
Total: 0.0991s
Avg: 99.0777ns

concatenation
Total: 0.1252s
Avg: 125.2442ns

.format method
Total: 0.3483s
Avg: 348.2690ns

this answer给出了对不同问题的类似答案。

Answer 6

从Python 3.6开始，您可以通过将f添加到字符串来执行literal string interpolation：

root = "sample"
output = "output"
path = f"{root}/{output}"

Answer 7

用于查看和维护代码。如果使用格式，编辑代码会更容易。此外，当您使用+时，您可能会错过像空格这样的细节。使用您和可能的维护人员的格式＆＃39;好。

格式化字符串与串联

7 个答案: