Question

出于好奇，我对这两个功能进行了以下基准测试：

In [12]: %timeit datetime.datetime.now()
100000 loops, best of 3: 5.09 µs per loop

In [13]: %timeit datetime.date.today()
100000 loops, best of 3: 6.4 µs per loop

我认为date对象涉及的信息较少，所以它应该更快，但结果却更慢。

可能是什么原因？

Answer 1

我今天被这个书呆子狙击了，所以我会告诉你我的发现 - 带上。

首先，date.today() 的实现必须通过成员函数调用——这个查找似乎是缓慢的部分：

https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/b2bf2bc1ece673d387341e06c8d3c2bc6e259747/Modules/_datetimemodule.c#L2886-L2892

此处摘录：

static PyObject *
date_today(PyObject *cls, PyObject *dummy)
{
    PyObject *time;
    PyObject *result;
    _Py_IDENTIFIER(fromtimestamp);

    time = time_time();
    if (time == NULL)
        return NULL;

    /* Note well:  today() is a class method, so this may not call
     * date.fromtimestamp.  For example, it may call
     * datetime.fromtimestamp.  That's why we need all the accuracy
     * time.time() delivers; if someone were gonzo about optimization,
     * date.today() could get away with plain C time().
     */
    result = _PyObject_CallMethodIdOneArg(cls, &PyId_fromtimestamp, time);
    Py_DECREF(time);
    return result;
}

值得注意的是它总是通过缓慢的路径

所以我想，为什么不给它一个快速的路径？

$ git diff -w
diff --git a/Modules/_datetimemodule.c b/Modules/_datetimemodule.c
index 8ef2dad37a..7eaa5d1740 100644
--- a/Modules/_datetimemodule.c
+++ b/Modules/_datetimemodule.c
@@ -2875,6 +2875,17 @@ date_fromtimestamp(PyObject *cls, PyObject *obj)
 static PyObject *
 date_today(PyObject *cls, PyObject *dummy)
 {
+    /* fast path, don't call fromtimestamp */
+    if ((PyTypeObject *)cls == &PyDateTime_DateType) {
+        struct tm tm;
+        time_t t;
+        time(&t);
+        localtime_r(&t, &tm);
+        return new_date_ex(tm.tm_year + 1900,
+                           tm.tm_mon + 1,
+                           tm.tm_mday,
+                           (PyTypeObject*)cls);
+    } else {
         PyObject *time;
         PyObject *result;
         _Py_IDENTIFIER(fromtimestamp);
@@ -2893,6 +2904,7 @@ date_today(PyObject *cls, PyObject *dummy)
         Py_DECREF(time);
         return result;
     }
+}
 
 /*[clinic input]
 @classmethod

缩放缩放

$ ./python -m timeit -s 'from datetime import date' 'date.today()'
500000 loops, best of 5: 407 nsec per loop
$ ./python -m timeit -s 'from datetime import datetime' 'datetime.now().date()'
500000 loops, best of 5: 764 nsec per loop

Answer 2

我认为datetime.datetime.today()是datetime.datetime.now()的一部分或者是{{1}}。我不确定。从“现在”中提取“今天”需要额外的时间。它还取决于硬件和调用进程的时间。您是否接受了很多读数并对其进行了平均测量，或者它的持续时间是否相同？

为什么`datetime.date.today`比Python中的`datetime.datetime.now`慢？

2 个答案: