使用Boost网站上提供的示例:http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_55_0/libs/multi_index/example/basic.cpp我已经学会了如何使用迭代器通过索引获取元素。但是,我想通过一个索引匹配并按另一个索引进行排序。
例如,在给定的示例中,我希望获得名称为“John”的所有员工,但将结果返回给我按年龄排序。到目前为止,当我按名字命名时,我会返回第一次出现的“约翰”,等等,但是除了插入记录的顺序之外,它们的返回方式没有顺序
请帮忙!
相关代码:
/* Boost.MultiIndex basic example.
*
* Copyright 2003-2008 Joaquin M Lopez Munoz.
* Distributed under the Boost Software License, Version 1.0.
* (See accompanying file LICENSE_1_0.txt or copy at
* http://www.boost.org/LICENSE_1_0.txt)
*
* See http://www.boost.org/libs/multi_index for library home page.
*/
#if !defined(NDEBUG)
#define BOOST_MULTI_INDEX_ENABLE_INVARIANT_CHECKING
#define BOOST_MULTI_INDEX_ENABLE_SAFE_MODE
#endif
#include <boost/multi_index_container.hpp>
#include <boost/multi_index/member.hpp>
#include <boost/multi_index/ordered_index.hpp>
#include <algorithm>
#include <iostream>
#include <iterator>
#include <string>
using boost::multi_index_container;
using namespace boost::multi_index;
/* an employee record holds its ID, name and age */
struct employee
{
int id;
std::string name;
int age;
employee(int id_,std::string name_,int age_):id(id_),name(name_),age(age_){}
friend std::ostream& operator<<(std::ostream& os,const employee& e)
{
os<<e.id<<" "<<e.name<<" "<<e.age<<std::endl;
return os;
}
};
/* tags for accessing the corresponding indices of employee_set */
struct id{};
struct name{};
struct age{};
/* see Compiler specifics: Use of member_offset for info on
* BOOST_MULTI_INDEX_MEMBER
*/
/* Define a multi_index_container of employees with following indices:
* - a unique index sorted by employee::int,
* - a non-unique index sorted by employee::name,
* - a non-unique index sorted by employee::age.
*/
typedef multi_index_container<
employee,
indexed_by<
ordered_unique<
tag<id>, BOOST_MULTI_INDEX_MEMBER(employee,int,id)>,
ordered_non_unique<
tag<name>,BOOST_MULTI_INDEX_MEMBER(employee,std::string,name)>,
ordered_non_unique<
tag<age>, BOOST_MULTI_INDEX_MEMBER(employee,int,age)> >
> employee_set;
template<typename Tag,typename MultiIndexContainer>
void print_out_by(
const MultiIndexContainer& s,
Tag* =0 /* fixes a MSVC++ 6.0 bug with implicit template function parms */
)
{
/* obtain a reference to the index tagged by Tag */
const typename boost::multi_index::index<MultiIndexContainer,Tag>::type& i=
get<Tag>(s);
typedef typename MultiIndexContainer::value_type value_type;
/* dump the elements of the index to cout */
std::copy(i.begin(),i.end(),std::ostream_iterator<value_type>(std::cout));
}
int main()
{
employee_set es;
es.insert(employee(0,"Joe",31));
es.insert(employee(1,"Robert",27));
es.insert(employee(2,"John",40));
/* next insertion will fail, as there is an employee with
* the same ID
*/
es.insert(employee(2,"Aristotle",2387));
es.insert(employee(3,"Albert",20));
es.insert(employee(4,"John",57));
/* list the employees sorted by ID, name and age */
std::cout<<"by ID"<<std::endl;
print_out_by<id>(es);
std::cout<<std::endl;
std::cout<<"by name"<<std::endl;
print_out_by<name>(es);
std::cout<<std::endl;
std::cout<<"by age"<<std::endl;
print_out_by<age>(es);
std::cout<<std::endl;
return 0;
}
答案 0 :(得分:1)
您可以通过以下两种方式之一来实现:
1:将第二个索引替换为基于composite key(姓名,年龄)的索引:
typedef multi_index_container<
employee,
indexed_by<
ordered_unique<
tag<id>, member<employee,int,&employee::id>>,
ordered_non_unique<
tag<name>,
composite_key<
employee,
member<employee,std::string,&employee::name>,
member<employee,int,&employee::age>
>
>,
ordered_non_unique<
tag<age>, member<employee,int,&employee::age>>
>
> employee_set;
int main()
{
employee_set es={
{0,"John",31},{1,"Robert",27},{2,"John",57},
{5,"John",2387},{3,"Albert",20},{4,"John",40}};
for(auto p=es.get<name>().equal_range("John");p.first!=p.second;++p.first){
std::cout<<*(p.first);
}
}
2:对结果进行排序:
template<typename Iterator>
std::vector<std::reference_wrapper<const employee>>
sort_by_age(std::pair<Iterator,Iterator> p)
{
std::vector<std::reference_wrapper<const employee>> v(p.first,p.second);
std::sort(v.begin(),v.end(),
[](const employee& e1,const employee& e2){return e1.age<e2.age;});
return v;
}
int main()
{
employee_set es={
{0,"John",31},{1,"Robert",27},{2,"John",57},
{5,"John",2387},{3,"Albert",20},{4,"John",40}};
for(auto e:sort_by_age(es.get<name>().equal_range("John"))){
std::cout<<e;
}
}
哪个更好? #1在没有进一步后处理的情况下给出了期望的结果,但是插入到索引中(稍微)慢,因为比较标准比通过名称的普通比较更昂贵。 #2具有后处理惩罚,但可以与除年龄之外的排序标准一起使用(#1,其中一个是在定义时固定的第二个键)。