MYSQL或vs IN性能

时间:2009-04-23 18:16:53

标签: mysql sql performance optimization

我想知道以下

之间的表现是否有任何差异
SELECT ... FROM ... WHERE someFIELD IN(1,2,3,4)

SELECT ... FROM ... WHERE someFIELD between  0 AND 5

SELECT ... FROM ... WHERE someFIELD = 1 OR someFIELD = 2 OR someFIELD = 3 ... 

或者MySQL会以与编译器优化代码相同的方式优化SQL吗?

编辑:由于评论中说明的原因,将AND更改为OR

14 个答案:

答案 0 :(得分:231)

我确实需要知道这一点,所以我对这两种方法进行了基准测试。我坚持认为IN要比使用OR快得多。

不要相信那些提出“意见”的人,科学就是测试和证据。

我运行了1000x等效查询的循环(为了保持一致性,我使用了sql_no_cache):

IN:2.34969592094s

OR:5.83781504631s

更新
(我没有原始测试的源代码,因为它是在6年前,虽然它返回的结果与此测试的范围相同)

在请求一些示例代码来测试它时,这是最简单的用例。使用Eloquent简化语法,原始SQL等价物执行相同的操作。

$t = microtime(true); 
for($i=0; $i<10000; $i++):
$q = DB::table('users')->where('id',1)
    ->orWhere('id',2)
    ->orWhere('id',3)
    ->orWhere('id',4)
    ->orWhere('id',5)
    ->orWhere('id',6)
    ->orWhere('id',7)
    ->orWhere('id',8)
    ->orWhere('id',9)
    ->orWhere('id',10)
    ->orWhere('id',11)
    ->orWhere('id',12)
    ->orWhere('id',13)
    ->orWhere('id',14)
    ->orWhere('id',15)
    ->orWhere('id',16)
    ->orWhere('id',17)
    ->orWhere('id',18)
    ->orWhere('id',19)
    ->orWhere('id',20)->get();
endfor;
$t2 = microtime(true); 
echo $t."\n".$t2."\n".($t2-$t)."\n";
  

1482080514.3635
  1482080517.3713
   3.0078368186951

$t = microtime(true); 
for($i=0; $i<10000; $i++): 
$q = DB::table('users')->whereIn('id',[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20])->get(); 
endfor; 
$t2 = microtime(true); 
echo $t."\n".$t2."\n".($t2-$t)."\n";
  

1482080534.0185
  1482080536.178
   2.1595389842987

答案 1 :(得分:63)

我也为未来的Google员工做过测试。返回结果的总数是10000中的7264

SELECT * FROM item WHERE id = 1 OR id = 2 ... id = 10000

此查询花了0.1239

SELECT * FROM item WHERE id IN (1,2,3,...10000)

此查询花了0.0433

INOR

快3倍

答案 2 :(得分:16)

我认为BETWEEN会更快,因为它应该转换为:

Field >= 0 AND Field <= 5

我的理解是IN无论如何都会被转换成一堆OR语句。 IN的值是易用性。 (节省必须多次键入每个列名并使其更容易与现有逻辑一起使用 - 您不必担心AND / OR优先级,因为IN是一个语句。使用一堆OR语句,您有确保用括号括起它们,以确保它们被评估为一个条件。)

您问题的唯一真正答案是查询您的查询。然后你就会知道在你的特定情况下哪种方法最有效。

答案 3 :(得分:11)

这取决于你在做什么;范围有多宽,数据类型是什么(我知道你的例子使用的是数字数据类型,但你的问题也适用于很多不同的数据类型)。

这是您想要双向编写查询的实例;让它工作,然后使用EXPLAIN来找出执行差异。

我确信这个问题有一个具体的答案,但实际上,这就是我想要找出问题的答案。

这可能有所帮助:http://forge.mysql.com/wiki/Top10SQLPerformanceTips

的问候,
弗兰克

答案 4 :(得分:7)

我认为对sunseeker观察的一个解释是MySQL实际上对IN语句中的值进行排序,如果它们都是静态值并且使用二进制搜索,这比普通的OR替代更有效。我不记得我在哪里读过,但是sunseeker的结果似乎是一个证据。

答案 5 :(得分:3)

OR将是最慢的。 IN或BETWEEN是否更快将取决于您的数据,但我希望BETWEEN正常更快,因为它可以简单地从索引获取范围(假设someField被索引)。

答案 6 :(得分:3)

就在你认为这是安全的时候......

eq_range_index_dive_limit的价值是多少?特别是,您在IN子句中有更多或更少的项目吗?

这将不包括基准,但会稍微进入内部工作。让我们使用工具查看发生了什么 - Optimizer Trace。

查询:SELECT * FROM canada WHERE id ...

OR为3个值,部分跟踪如下:

       "condition_processing": {
          "condition": "WHERE",
          "original_condition": "((`canada`.`id` = 296172) or (`canada`.`id` = 295093) or (`canada`.`id` = 293626))",
          "steps": [
            {
              "transformation": "equality_propagation",
              "resulting_condition": "(multiple equal(296172, `canada`.`id`) or multiple equal(295093, `canada`.`id`) or multiple equal(293626, `canada`.`id`))"
            },

...

              "analyzing_range_alternatives": {
                "range_scan_alternatives": [
                  {
                    "index": "id",
                    "ranges": [
                      "293626 <= id <= 293626",
                      "295093 <= id <= 295093",
                      "296172 <= id <= 296172"
                    ],
                    "index_dives_for_eq_ranges": true,
                    "chosen": true

...

        "refine_plan": [
          {
            "table": "`canada`",
            "pushed_index_condition": "((`canada`.`id` = 296172) or (`canada`.`id` = 295093) or (`canada`.`id` = 293626))",
            "table_condition_attached": null,
            "access_type": "range"
          }
        ]

注意如何给予ICP ORs。这个暗示 OR没有变成IN,而InnoDB将通过ICP执行一系列=测试。 (我认为不值得考虑MyISAM。)

(这是Percona的5.6.22-71.0-log; id是次要索引。)

现在IN()有几个值

eq_range_index_dive_limit = 10;有8个值。

        "condition_processing": {
          "condition": "WHERE",
          "original_condition": "(`canada`.`id` in (296172,295093,293626,295573,297148,296127,295588,295810))",
          "steps": [
            {
              "transformation": "equality_propagation",
              "resulting_condition": "(`canada`.`id` in (296172,295093,293626,295573,297148,296127,295588,295810))"
            },

...

              "analyzing_range_alternatives": {
                "range_scan_alternatives": [
                  {
                    "index": "id",
                    "ranges": [
                      "293626 <= id <= 293626",
                      "295093 <= id <= 295093",
                      "295573 <= id <= 295573",
                      "295588 <= id <= 295588",
                      "295810 <= id <= 295810",
                      "296127 <= id <= 296127",
                      "296172 <= id <= 296172",
                      "297148 <= id <= 297148"
                    ],
                    "index_dives_for_eq_ranges": true,
                    "chosen": true

...

        "refine_plan": [
          {
            "table": "`canada`",
            "pushed_index_condition": "(`canada`.`id` in (296172,295093,293626,295573,297148,296127,295588,295810))",
            "table_condition_attached": null,
            "access_type": "range"
          }
        ]

请注意,IN似乎没有变成OR

附注:请注意常量值已排序。这可以通过两种方式获益:

  • 通过减少跳转,可能会有更好的缓存,更少的I / O来获取所有值。
  • 如果两个类似的查询来自不同的连接,并且它们处于事务中,则由于重叠列表,更有可能获得延迟而不是死锁。

最后,IN()有很多值

      {
        "condition_processing": {
          "condition": "WHERE",
          "original_condition": "(`canada`.`id` in (293831,292259,292881,293440,292558,295792,292293,292593,294337,295430,295034,297060,293811,295587,294651,295559,293213,295742,292605,296018,294529,296711,293919,294732,294689,295540,293000,296916,294433,297112,293815,292522,296816,293320,293232,295369,291894,293700,291839,293049,292738,294895,294473,294023,294173,293019,291976,294923,294797,296958,294075,293450,296952,297185,295351,295736,296312,294330,292717,294638,294713,297176,295896,295137,296573,292236,294966,296642,296073,295903,293057,294628,292639,293803,294470,295353,297196,291752,296118,296964,296185,295338,295956,296064,295039,297201,297136,295206,295986,292172,294803,294480,294706,296975,296604,294493,293181,292526,293354,292374,292344,293744,294165,295082,296203,291918,295211,294289,294877,293120,295387))",
          "steps": [
            {
              "transformation": "equality_propagation",
              "resulting_condition": "(`canada`.`id` in (293831,292259,292881,293440,292558,295792,292293,292593,294337,295430,295034,297060,293811,295587,294651,295559,293213,295742,292605,296018,294529,296711,293919,294732,294689,295540,293000,296916,294433,297112,293815,292522,296816,293320,293232,295369,291894,293700,291839,293049,292738,294895,294473,294023,294173,293019,291976,294923,294797,296958,294075,293450,296952,297185,295351,295736,296312,294330,292717,294638,294713,297176,295896,295137,296573,292236,294966,296642,296073,295903,293057,294628,292639,293803,294470,295353,297196,291752,296118,296964,296185,295338,295956,296064,295039,297201,297136,295206,295986,292172,294803,294480,294706,296975,296604,294493,293181,292526,293354,292374,292344,293744,294165,295082,296203,291918,295211,294289,294877,293120,295387))"
            },

...

              "analyzing_range_alternatives": {
                "range_scan_alternatives": [
                  {
                    "index": "id",
                    "ranges": [
                      "291752 <= id <= 291752",
                      "291839 <= id <= 291839",
                      ...
                      "297196 <= id <= 297196",
                      "297201 <= id <= 297201"
                    ],
                    "index_dives_for_eq_ranges": false,
                    "rows": 111,
                    "chosen": true

...

        "refine_plan": [
          {
            "table": "`canada`",
            "pushed_index_condition": "(`canada`.`id` in (293831,292259,292881,293440,292558,295792,292293,292593,294337,295430,295034,297060,293811,295587,294651,295559,293213,295742,292605,296018,294529,296711,293919,294732,294689,295540,293000,296916,294433,297112,293815,292522,296816,293320,293232,295369,291894,293700,291839,293049,292738,294895,294473,294023,294173,293019,291976,294923,294797,296958,294075,293450,296952,297185,295351,295736,296312,294330,292717,294638,294713,297176,295896,295137,296573,292236,294966,296642,296073,295903,293057,294628,292639,293803,294470,295353,297196,291752,296118,296964,296185,295338,295956,296064,295039,297201,297136,295206,295986,292172,294803,294480,294706,296975,296604,294493,293181,292526,293354,292374,292344,293744,294165,295082,296203,291918,295211,294289,294877,293120,295387))",
            "table_condition_attached": null,
            "access_type": "range"
          }
        ]

旁注:由于跟踪的庞大性,我需要这个:

@@global.optimizer_trace_max_mem_size = 32222;

答案 7 :(得分:2)

我敢打赌他们是一样的,你可以通过以下方式进行测试:

循环“in(1,2,3,4)”500次,看看需要多长时间。循环遍历“= 1或= 2或= 3 ......”版本500次并查看其运行时间。

你也可以尝试一种加入方式,如果someField是一个索引而你的表很大就可以更快......

SELECT ... 
    FROM ... 
        INNER JOIN (SELECT 1 as newField UNION ALL SELECT 2 UNION ALL SELECT 3 UNION ALL SELECT 4) dt ON someFIELD =newField

我在我的SQL Server上尝试了上面的连接方法,它与in(1,2,3,4)几乎相同,它们都导致聚簇索引搜索。我不确定MySQL将如何处理它们。

答案 8 :(得分:2)

以下是使用MySQL 5.6 @SQLFiddle

的6个查询的详细信息

总之,6个查询涵盖了独立的索引列,每个数据类型使用了2个查询。无论使用IN()还是OR,所有查询都会导致使用索引。

        |   ORs      |   IN()
integer | uses index | uses index
date    | uses index | uses index
varchar | uses index | uses index

我真的只想揭穿声明,OR表示不能使用索引。事实并非如此。索引可以在使用OR的查询中用作以下示例中的6个查询。

在我看来,许多人忽略了IN()是一组OR的语法快捷方式这一事实。在小规模的性能上,使用IN()-v-OR之间的差异是非常(无限制地)边际。

虽然规模较大,但IN()肯定更方便,但它在逻辑上等同于一组OR条件。每个查询的情况更改,因此在表上测试查询总是最好的。

6个解释计划的摘要,全部是“使用索引条件”(向右滚动)

  Query               select_type    table    type    possible_keys      key      key_len   ref   rows   filtered           Extra          
                      ------------- --------- ------- --------------- ----------- --------- ----- ------ ---------- ----------------------- 
  Integers using OR   SIMPLE        mytable   range   aNum_idx        aNum_idx    4               10     100.00     Using index condition  
  Integers using IN   SIMPLE        mytable   range   aNum_idx        aNum_idx    4               10     100.00     Using index condition  
  Dates using OR      SIMPLE        mytable   range   aDate_idx       aDate_idx   6               7      100.00     Using index condition  
  Dates using IN      SIMPLE        mytable   range   aDate_idx       aDate_idx   6               7      100.00     Using index condition  
  Varchar using OR    SIMPLE        mytable   range   aName_idx       aName_idx   768             10     100.00     Using index condition  
  Varchar using IN    SIMPLE        mytable   range   aName_idx       aName_idx   768             10     100.00     Using index condition  

SQL Fiddle

MySQL 5.6架构设置

CREATE TABLE `myTable` (
  `id` mediumint(8) unsigned NOT NULL auto_increment,
  `aName` varchar(255) default NULL,
  `aDate` datetime,
  `aNum`  mediumint(8),
  PRIMARY KEY (`id`)
) AUTO_INCREMENT=1;

ALTER TABLE `myTable` ADD INDEX `aName_idx` (`aName`);
ALTER TABLE `myTable` ADD INDEX `aDate_idx` (`aDate`);
ALTER TABLE `myTable` ADD INDEX `aNum_idx` (`aNum`);

INSERT INTO `myTable` (`aName`,`aDate`)
 VALUES 
 ("Daniel","2017-09-19 01:22:31")
,("Quentin","2017-06-03 01:06:45")
,("Chester","2017-06-14 17:49:36")
,("Lev","2017-08-30 06:27:59")
,("Garrett","2018-10-04 02:40:37")
,("Lane","2017-01-22 17:11:21")
,("Chaim","2017-09-20 11:13:46")
,("Kieran","2018-03-10 18:37:26")
,("Cedric","2017-05-20 16:25:10")
,("Conan","2018-07-10 06:29:39")
,("Rudyard","2017-07-14 00:04:00")
,("Chadwick","2018-08-18 08:54:08")
,("Darius","2018-10-02 06:55:56")
,("Joseph","2017-06-19 13:20:33")
,("Wayne","2017-04-02 23:20:25")
,("Hall","2017-10-13 00:17:24")
,("Craig","2016-12-04 08:15:22")
,("Keane","2018-03-12 04:21:46")
,("Russell","2017-07-14 17:21:58")
,("Seth","2018-07-25 05:51:30")
,("Cole","2018-06-09 15:32:53")
,("Donovan","2017-08-12 05:21:35")
,("Damon","2017-06-27 03:44:19")
,("Brian","2017-02-01 23:35:20")
,("Harper","2017-08-25 04:29:27")
,("Chandler","2017-09-30 23:54:06")
,("Edward","2018-07-30 12:18:07")
,("Curran","2018-05-23 09:31:53")
,("Uriel","2017-05-08 03:31:43")
,("Honorato","2018-04-07 14:57:53")
,("Griffin","2017-01-07 23:35:31")
,("Hasad","2017-05-15 05:32:41")
,("Burke","2017-07-04 01:11:19")
,("Hyatt","2017-03-14 17:12:28")
,("Brenden","2017-10-17 05:16:14")
,("Ryan","2018-10-10 08:07:55")
,("Giacomo","2018-10-06 14:21:21")
,("James","2018-02-06 02:45:59")
,("Colt","2017-10-10 08:11:26")
,("Kermit","2017-09-18 16:57:16")
,("Drake","2018-05-20 22:08:36")
,("Berk","2017-04-16 17:39:32")
,("Alan","2018-09-01 05:33:05")
,("Deacon","2017-04-20 07:03:05")
,("Omar","2018-03-02 15:04:32")
,("Thaddeus","2017-09-19 04:07:54")
,("Troy","2016-12-13 04:24:08")
,("Rogan","2017-11-02 00:03:25")
,("Grant","2017-08-21 01:45:16")
,("Walker","2016-11-26 15:54:52")
,("Clarke","2017-07-20 02:26:56")
,("Clayton","2018-08-16 05:09:29")
,("Denton","2018-08-11 05:26:05")
,("Nicholas","2018-07-19 09:29:55")
,("Hashim","2018-08-10 20:38:06")
,("Todd","2016-10-25 01:01:36")
,("Xenos","2017-05-11 22:50:35")
,("Bert","2017-06-17 18:08:21")
,("Oleg","2018-01-03 13:10:32")
,("Hall","2018-06-04 01:53:45")
,("Evan","2017-01-16 01:04:25")
,("Mohammad","2016-11-18 05:42:52")
,("Armand","2016-12-18 06:57:57")
,("Kaseem","2018-06-12 23:09:57")
,("Colin","2017-06-29 05:25:52")
,("Arthur","2016-12-29 04:38:13")
,("Xander","2016-11-14 19:35:32")
,("Dante","2016-12-01 09:01:04")
,("Zahir","2018-02-17 14:44:53")
,("Raymond","2017-03-09 05:33:06")
,("Giacomo","2017-04-17 06:12:52")
,("Fulton","2017-06-04 00:41:57")
,("Chase","2018-01-14 03:03:57")
,("William","2017-05-08 09:44:59")
,("Fuller","2017-03-31 20:35:20")
,("Jarrod","2017-02-15 02:45:29")
,("Nissim","2018-03-11 14:19:25")
,("Chester","2017-11-05 00:14:27")
,("Perry","2017-12-24 11:58:04")
,("Theodore","2017-06-26 12:34:12")
,("Mason","2017-10-02 03:53:49")
,("Brenden","2018-10-08 10:09:47")
,("Jerome","2017-11-05 20:34:25")
,("Keaton","2018-08-18 00:55:56")
,("Tiger","2017-05-21 16:59:07")
,("Benjamin","2018-04-10 14:46:36")
,("John","2018-09-05 18:53:03")
,("Jakeem","2018-10-11 00:17:38")
,("Kenyon","2017-12-18 22:19:29")
,("Ferris","2017-03-29 06:59:13")
,("Hoyt","2017-01-03 03:48:56")
,("Fitzgerald","2017-07-27 11:27:52")
,("Forrest","2017-10-05 23:14:21")
,("Jordan","2017-01-11 03:48:09")
,("Lev","2017-05-25 08:03:39")
,("Chase","2017-06-18 19:09:23")
,("Ryder","2016-12-13 12:50:50")
,("Malik","2017-11-19 15:15:55")
,("Zeph","2018-04-04 11:22:12")
,("Amala","2017-01-29 07:52:17")
;

update MyTable
set aNum = id
;

查询1

select 'aNum by OR' q, mytable.*
from mytable
where aNum = 12
OR aNum = 22
OR aNum = 27
OR aNum = 32
OR aNum = 42
OR aNum = 52
OR aNum = 62
OR aNum = 65
OR aNum = 72
OR aNum = 82

<强> Results

|          q | id |    aName |                aDate | aNum |
|------------|----|----------|----------------------|------|
| aNum by OR | 12 | Chadwick | 2018-08-18T08:54:08Z |   12 |
| aNum by OR | 22 |  Donovan | 2017-08-12T05:21:35Z |   22 |
| aNum by OR | 27 |   Edward | 2018-07-30T12:18:07Z |   27 |
| aNum by OR | 32 |    Hasad | 2017-05-15T05:32:41Z |   32 |
| aNum by OR | 42 |     Berk | 2017-04-16T17:39:32Z |   42 |
| aNum by OR | 52 |  Clayton | 2018-08-16T05:09:29Z |   52 |
| aNum by OR | 62 | Mohammad | 2016-11-18T05:42:52Z |   62 |
| aNum by OR | 65 |    Colin | 2017-06-29T05:25:52Z |   65 |
| aNum by OR | 72 |   Fulton | 2017-06-04T00:41:57Z |   72 |
| aNum by OR | 82 |  Brenden | 2018-10-08T10:09:47Z |   82 |

查询2

select 'aNum by IN' q, mytable.*
from mytable
where aNum IN (
            12
          , 22
          , 27
          , 32
          , 42
          , 52
          , 62
          , 65
          , 72
          , 82
          )

<强> Results

|          q | id |    aName |                aDate | aNum |
|------------|----|----------|----------------------|------|
| aNum by IN | 12 | Chadwick | 2018-08-18T08:54:08Z |   12 |
| aNum by IN | 22 |  Donovan | 2017-08-12T05:21:35Z |   22 |
| aNum by IN | 27 |   Edward | 2018-07-30T12:18:07Z |   27 |
| aNum by IN | 32 |    Hasad | 2017-05-15T05:32:41Z |   32 |
| aNum by IN | 42 |     Berk | 2017-04-16T17:39:32Z |   42 |
| aNum by IN | 52 |  Clayton | 2018-08-16T05:09:29Z |   52 |
| aNum by IN | 62 | Mohammad | 2016-11-18T05:42:52Z |   62 |
| aNum by IN | 65 |    Colin | 2017-06-29T05:25:52Z |   65 |
| aNum by IN | 72 |   Fulton | 2017-06-04T00:41:57Z |   72 |
| aNum by IN | 82 |  Brenden | 2018-10-08T10:09:47Z |   82 |

查询3

select 'adate by OR' q, mytable.*
from mytable
where aDate= str_to_date("2017-02-15 02:45:29",'%Y-%m-%d %h:%i:%s')
OR aDate = str_to_date("2018-03-10 18:37:26",'%Y-%m-%d %h:%i:%s')
OR aDate = str_to_date("2017-05-20 16:25:10",'%Y-%m-%d %h:%i:%s')
OR aDate = str_to_date("2018-07-10 06:29:39",'%Y-%m-%d %h:%i:%s')
OR aDate = str_to_date("2017-07-14 00:04:00",'%Y-%m-%d %h:%i:%s')
OR aDate = str_to_date("2018-08-18 08:54:08",'%Y-%m-%d %h:%i:%s')
OR aDate = str_to_date("2018-10-02 06:55:56",'%Y-%m-%d %h:%i:%s')
OR aDate = str_to_date("2017-04-20 07:03:05",'%Y-%m-%d %h:%i:%s')
OR aDate = str_to_date("2018-03-02 15:04:32",'%Y-%m-%d %h:%i:%s')
OR aDate = str_to_date("2017-09-19 04:07:54",'%Y-%m-%d %h:%i:%s')
OR aDate = str_to_date("2016-12-13 04:24:08",'%Y-%m-%d %h:%i:%s')

<强> Results

|           q | id |    aName |                aDate | aNum |
|-------------|----|----------|----------------------|------|
| adate by OR | 47 |     Troy | 2016-12-13T04:24:08Z |   47 |
| adate by OR | 76 |   Jarrod | 2017-02-15T02:45:29Z |   76 |
| adate by OR | 44 |   Deacon | 2017-04-20T07:03:05Z |   44 |
| adate by OR | 46 | Thaddeus | 2017-09-19T04:07:54Z |   46 |
| adate by OR | 10 |    Conan | 2018-07-10T06:29:39Z |   10 |
| adate by OR | 12 | Chadwick | 2018-08-18T08:54:08Z |   12 |
| adate by OR | 13 |   Darius | 2018-10-02T06:55:56Z |   13 |

查询4

select 'adate by IN' q, mytable.*
from mytable
where aDate IN (
          str_to_date("2017-02-15 02:45:29",'%Y-%m-%d %h:%i:%s')
        , str_to_date("2018-03-10 18:37:26",'%Y-%m-%d %h:%i:%s')
        , str_to_date("2017-05-20 16:25:10",'%Y-%m-%d %h:%i:%s')
        , str_to_date("2018-07-10 06:29:39",'%Y-%m-%d %h:%i:%s')
        , str_to_date("2017-07-14 00:04:00",'%Y-%m-%d %h:%i:%s')
        , str_to_date("2018-08-18 08:54:08",'%Y-%m-%d %h:%i:%s')
        , str_to_date("2018-10-02 06:55:56",'%Y-%m-%d %h:%i:%s')
        , str_to_date("2017-04-20 07:03:05",'%Y-%m-%d %h:%i:%s')
        , str_to_date("2018-03-02 15:04:32",'%Y-%m-%d %h:%i:%s')
        , str_to_date("2017-09-19 04:07:54",'%Y-%m-%d %h:%i:%s')
        , str_to_date("2016-12-13 04:24:08",'%Y-%m-%d %h:%i:%s')
        )

<强> Results

|           q | id |    aName |                aDate | aNum |
|-------------|----|----------|----------------------|------|
| adate by IN | 47 |     Troy | 2016-12-13T04:24:08Z |   47 |
| adate by IN | 76 |   Jarrod | 2017-02-15T02:45:29Z |   76 |
| adate by IN | 44 |   Deacon | 2017-04-20T07:03:05Z |   44 |
| adate by IN | 46 | Thaddeus | 2017-09-19T04:07:54Z |   46 |
| adate by IN | 10 |    Conan | 2018-07-10T06:29:39Z |   10 |
| adate by IN | 12 | Chadwick | 2018-08-18T08:54:08Z |   12 |
| adate by IN | 13 |   Darius | 2018-10-02T06:55:56Z |   13 |

查询5

select 'name by  OR' q, mytable.*
from mytable
where aname = 'Alan'
OR aname = 'Brian'
OR aname = 'Chandler'
OR aname = 'Darius'
OR aname = 'Evan'
OR aname = 'Ferris'
OR aname = 'Giacomo'
OR aname = 'Hall'
OR aname = 'James'
OR aname = 'Jarrod'

<强> Results

|           q | id |    aName |                aDate | aNum |
|-------------|----|----------|----------------------|------|
| name by  OR | 43 |     Alan | 2018-09-01T05:33:05Z |   43 |
| name by  OR | 24 |    Brian | 2017-02-01T23:35:20Z |   24 |
| name by  OR | 26 | Chandler | 2017-09-30T23:54:06Z |   26 |
| name by  OR | 13 |   Darius | 2018-10-02T06:55:56Z |   13 |
| name by  OR | 61 |     Evan | 2017-01-16T01:04:25Z |   61 |
| name by  OR | 90 |   Ferris | 2017-03-29T06:59:13Z |   90 |
| name by  OR | 37 |  Giacomo | 2018-10-06T14:21:21Z |   37 |
| name by  OR | 71 |  Giacomo | 2017-04-17T06:12:52Z |   71 |
| name by  OR | 16 |     Hall | 2017-10-13T00:17:24Z |   16 |
| name by  OR | 60 |     Hall | 2018-06-04T01:53:45Z |   60 |
| name by  OR | 38 |    James | 2018-02-06T02:45:59Z |   38 |
| name by  OR | 76 |   Jarrod | 2017-02-15T02:45:29Z |   76 |

查询6

select 'name by IN' q, mytable.*
from mytable
where aname IN (
      'Alan'
     ,'Brian'
     ,'Chandler'
     , 'Darius'
     , 'Evan'
     , 'Ferris'
     , 'Giacomo'
     , 'Hall'
     , 'James'
     , 'Jarrod'
     )

<强> Results

|          q | id |    aName |                aDate | aNum |
|------------|----|----------|----------------------|------|
| name by IN | 43 |     Alan | 2018-09-01T05:33:05Z |   43 |
| name by IN | 24 |    Brian | 2017-02-01T23:35:20Z |   24 |
| name by IN | 26 | Chandler | 2017-09-30T23:54:06Z |   26 |
| name by IN | 13 |   Darius | 2018-10-02T06:55:56Z |   13 |
| name by IN | 61 |     Evan | 2017-01-16T01:04:25Z |   61 |
| name by IN | 90 |   Ferris | 2017-03-29T06:59:13Z |   90 |
| name by IN | 37 |  Giacomo | 2018-10-06T14:21:21Z |   37 |
| name by IN | 71 |  Giacomo | 2017-04-17T06:12:52Z |   71 |
| name by IN | 16 |     Hall | 2017-10-13T00:17:24Z |   16 |
| name by IN | 60 |     Hall | 2018-06-04T01:53:45Z |   60 |
| name by IN | 38 |    James | 2018-02-06T02:45:59Z |   38 |
| name by IN | 76 |   Jarrod | 2017-02-15T02:45:29Z |   76 |

答案 9 :(得分:2)

接受的答案没有说明原因。

以下引用自高性能MySQL,第3版。

  

在许多数据库服务器中,IN()只是多个OR子句的同义词,因为两者在逻辑上是等效的。在MySQL中不是这样,MySQL对IN()列表中的值进行排序,并使用快速二进制搜索来查看列表中是否包含值。列表的大小为O(Log n),而等效的OR子句序列的列表的大小为O(n)(即,大列表的速度要慢得多)

答案 10 :(得分:0)

根据我对编译器优化这些类型查询的方式的理解,使用IN子句比多个OR子句更有效。如果您有可以使用BETWEEN子句的值,那么效率更高。

答案 11 :(得分:0)

我知道,只要你在Field上有一个索引,BETWEEN就会用它快速找到一端,然后遍历另一端。这是最有效的。

我看过的每一个EXPLAIN都显示“IN(...)”和“...... OR ......”可以互换,同样(有效)。您可以期待,因为优化器无法知道它们是否包含间隔。它也相当于各个值上的UNION ALL SELECT。

答案 12 :(得分:0)

2018: IN 更快。但&gt; =&amp;&amp; &lt; = 甚至比 IN 更快。

这是我的benchmark

答案 13 :(得分:0)

正如其他人所解释的,就查询性能而言,IN比OR更好地选择。

在以下情况下,具有OR条件的查询可能需要更长的执行时间。

    如果MySQL优化程序选择其他任何索引有效(在误报情况下),则执行
  1. 如果记录数量更多(正如Jacob明确指出的那样)