是否有可靠的Java Pair类实现?
我的意思是随时可用,广泛接受和测试,可能是更广泛的库的一部分,如Apache Commons或Guava。
答案 0 :(得分:34)
是的,请看一下Apache Commons Pair
。
谨慎使用,,如果有的话; left
和right
并未真正传达有关元素之间内容或关系的任何内容。
(故意将Pair
类排除在标准Java API之外。)
答案 1 :(得分:12)
答案 2 :(得分:8)
以下是Android SDK的实现:
/**
* Container to ease passing around a tuple of two objects. This object provides a sensible
* implementation of equals(), returning true if equals() is true on each of the contained
* objects.
*/
public class Pair<F, S> {
public final F first;
public final S second;
/**
* Constructor for a Pair.
*
* @param first the first object in the Pair
* @param second the second object in the pair
*/
public Pair(F first, S second) {
this.first = first;
this.second = second;
}
/**
* Checks the two objects for equality by delegating to their respective
* {@link Object#equals(Object)} methods.
*
* @param o the {@link Pair} to which this one is to be checked for equality
* @return true if the underlying objects of the Pair are both considered
* equal
*/
@Override
public boolean equals(Object o) {
if (!(o instanceof Pair)) {
return false;
}
Pair<?, ?> p = (Pair<?, ?>) o;
return Objects.equal(p.first, first) && Objects.equal(p.second, second);
}
/**
* Compute a hash code using the hash codes of the underlying objects
*
* @return a hashcode of the Pair
*/
@Override
public int hashCode() {
return (first == null ? 0 : first.hashCode()) ^ (second == null ? 0 : second.hashCode());
}
/**
* Convenience method for creating an appropriately typed pair.
* @param a the first object in the Pair
* @param b the second object in the pair
* @return a Pair that is templatized with the types of a and b
*/
public static <A, B> Pair <A, B> create(A a, B b) {
return new Pair<A, B>(a, b);
}
}
答案 3 :(得分:7)
我需要存储对时使用AbstractMap.SimpleEntry和AbstractMap.SimpleImmutableEntry(如大小和对象集合)。
我的生产代码中的这篇文章:
public Map<L1Risk, Map.Entry<int[], Map<L2Risk, Map.Entry<int[], Map<L3Risk, List<Event>>>>>>
getEventTable(RiskClassifier classifier) {
Map<L1Risk, Map.Entry<int[], Map<L2Risk, Map.Entry<int[], Map<L3Risk, List<Event>>>>>> l1s = new HashMap<>();
Map<L2Risk, Map.Entry<int[], Map<L3Risk, List<Event>>>> l2s = new HashMap<>();
Map<L3Risk, List<Event>> l3s = new HashMap<>();
List<Event> events = new ArrayList<>();
...
map.put(l3s, events);
map.put(l2s, new AbstractMap.SimpleImmutableEntry<>(l3Size, l3s));
map.put(l1s, new AbstractMap.SimpleImmutableEntry<>(l2Size, l2s));
}
代码看起来很复杂,但不是 Map.Entry ,而是限制为对象数组(大小为2)并丢失类型检查......
答案 4 :(得分:5)
JavaFX将其作为javafx.util.Pair
。
http://docs.oracle.com/javafx/2/api/javafx/util/Pair.html
如果在Java SDK中包含jfxrt.jar,则可以使用它。
答案 5 :(得分:3)
我的解决方案是:
public class Pair<F, S> extends java.util.AbstractMap.SimpleImmutableEntry<F, S> {
public Pair( F f, S s ) {
super( f, s );
}
public F getFirst() {
return getKey();
}
public S getSecond() {
return getValue();
}
public String toString() {
return "["+getKey()+","+getValue()+"]";
}
}
非常简单,具有包装的AbstractMap.SimpleImmutableEntry类的所有好处。