Boost :: Asio:async_read问题

时间:2011-06-03 09:58:14

标签: c++ boost-asio

我正在编写一个简单的ProxyServer来分析包并将它们发送到另一个服务器实例,例如像这样的东西:

客户 - > MyProxy - > SQLServer - >
客户端< - MyProxy< - SQLServer< -

它应该在无限循环中运行。 我现在的问题是代理似乎松散了包,有时甚至挂起。 当我添加大量调试信息(写入控制台)时,ProxyServer就是 更加稳定。似乎ProxyServer太快..: - )

我很确定我做错了什么,这是我的会话类的代码(代码来自Boost :: Asio示例)。

#include "session.h"

#include <iostream>
using namespace std;

session::session(boost::asio::io_service& io_service)
: socket_(io_service)
, sqlsocket_(io_service)
, io_service_(io_service)
, resolver(io_service)
{
    cout << "session::session()" << endl;
}

session::~session()
{
    cout << "session::~session()" << endl;
    cout << "closing session ..." << endl;
}

tcp::socket& session::socket()
{
    return socket_;
}

void session::start()
{
    cout << "session::start()" << endl;
    cout << "starting session ..." << endl;

    // connect to the sqlserver database
    tcp::resolver::query query("192.168.1.50", "1317");
    tcp::resolver::iterator endpoint_iterator = resolver.resolve(query);
    tcp::endpoint endpoint = *endpoint_iterator;

    sqlsocket_.async_connect(endpoint,
        boost::bind(&session::handle_sqlserver_connect, this,
        boost::asio::placeholders::error, ++endpoint_iterator));

    // TODO: connect to the connector
}

void session::handle_read(const boost::system::error_code& error,
                          size_t bytes_transferred)
{
    cout << "session::handle_read()" << endl;
    if (!error)
    {
        cout << "session::handle_read() (read: " 
             << bytes_transferred << ")"
             << endl;
        boost::asio::async_write(sqlsocket_,
            boost::asio::buffer(data_, bytes_transferred),
            boost::bind(&session::handle_sqlserver_write, this,
            boost::asio::placeholders::error, bytes_transferred));
    }
    else
    {
        delete this;
    }
}

void session::handle_sqlserver_read(const boost::system::error_code& error,
                                    size_t bytes_transferred)
{
    cout << "session::handle_sqlserver_read()" << endl;
    if (!error)
    {
        cout << "session::handle_sqlserver_read() (read: " 
             << bytes_transferred << ")"
             << endl;
        boost::asio::async_write(socket_,
            boost::asio::buffer(data_, bytes_transferred),
            boost::bind(&session::handle_write, this,
            boost::asio::placeholders::error, bytes_transferred));
    }
    else
    {
        delete this;
    }
}

void session::handle_write(const boost::system::error_code& error,
                           size_t bytes_transferred)
{
    static int count = 0;
    cout << ++count << ". session::handle_write()" << endl;
    if (!error)
    {
        cout << "session::handle_write() (read: " 
             << bytes_transferred << ")"
             << endl;
        socket_.async_read_some(boost::asio::buffer(data_, max_length),
            boost::bind(&session::handle_read, this,
            boost::asio::placeholders::error,
            boost::asio::placeholders::bytes_transferred));
    }
    else
    {
        delete this;
    }
}

void session::handle_sqlserver_write(const boost::system::error_code& error,
                                     size_t bytes_transferred)
{
    cout << "session::handle_sqlserver_write()" << endl;
    if (!error)
    {
        cout << "session::handle_sqlserver_write() (read: " 
             << bytes_transferred << ")"
             << endl;
        sqlsocket_.async_read_some(boost::asio::buffer(data_, max_length),
            boost::bind(&session::handle_sqlserver_read, this,
            boost::asio::placeholders::error,
            boost::asio::placeholders::bytes_transferred));
    }
    else
    {
        delete this;
    }
}

void session::handle_sqlserver_connect(const boost::system::error_code& error,
                                       tcp::resolver::iterator endpoint_iterator)
{
    cout << "session::handle_sqlserver_connect()" << endl;
    if (!error)
    {
        socket_.async_read_some(boost::asio::buffer(data_, max_length),
            boost::bind(&session::handle_read, this,
            boost::asio::placeholders::error,
            boost::asio::placeholders::bytes_transferred));
    }
    else if (endpoint_iterator != tcp::resolver::iterator())
    {
        sqlsocket_.close();
        tcp::endpoint endpoint = *endpoint_iterator;
        sqlsocket_.async_connect(endpoint,
            boost::bind(&session::handle_sqlserver_connect, this,
            boost::asio::placeholders::error, ++endpoint_iterator));
    }
}

我的代理类型是否需要使用其他方法而不是async_ *? 我正在从我的公司想要重新启动的一些旧项目移植代码,但使用boost而不是之前使用的Winsock内容。

知道可能是什么问题吗?

旧代码做了这样的事情: 使用accept方法调用的main方法创建了两个线程

CreateThread(0, 0, (LPTHREAD_START_ROUTINE)listenatclient, (LPVOID)cs, 0, 0);
CreateThread(0, 0, (LPTHREAD_START_ROUTINE)listenatserver, (LPVOID)cs, 0, 0);

并且线程调用以下函数:

void listenatclient(LPVOID connection)
{
    connection_s* cs = (connection_s*)connection;
    char inMessagecli[MSG_SIZE];
    int rcount = 0;

    ...

    do
    {
        memset(inMessagecli, 0, MSG_SIZE);
        rcount = recv((SOCKET)cs->client, inMessagecli, MSG_SIZE, 0);
        if (rcount != SOCKET_ERROR)
        {
            // analyze package
            ...

            send((SOCKET)cs->server, inMessagecli, rcount, 0);
        }
    } while (rcount > 0);
}

void listenatserver(LPVOID connection)
{
    connection_s* cs = (connection_s*)connection;
    char inMessageserv[MSG_SIZE];
    int rcount = 0;

    do
    {
        memset(inMessageserv, 0, MSG_SIZE);
        rcount = recv((SOCKET)cs->server, inMessageserv, MSG_SIZE, 0);
        if (rcount != SOCKET_ERROR)
        {
            send((SOCKET)cs->client, inMessageserv, rcount, 0);         
        }
    } while (rcount > 0);
}

[编辑]: 我试图同时为客户端和sqlserver运行async_read命令,但现在我总是崩溃,有时在boost :: bind中,有时在boost库的其他部分。

似乎发生的是创建了2个或3个连接(3个会话)。在关闭第一个会话时,崩溃似乎发生在第二个会话中。

提升asio是不是没有踏板,或者我在这里做了一些非常错误的事情:-)?

我在这里发布了小型ProxyServer的代码:

session.h:link

session.cpp:link

server.h:link

server.cpp:link

ProxyServer.cpp:link

1 个答案:

答案 0 :(得分:4)

我怀疑发生的事情是你的一个async_read_some调用正在返回“某些”数据,但还不足以让SQL服务器满意它收到了一个完整的请求。您的代码始终遵循read_from_client - &gt;的路径。 send_to_server - &gt; read_from_server - &gt; send_to_client。它不处理你需要read_from_client - &gt;的情况。 send_to_server - &gt; read_from_client - &gt; send_to_server - &gt; read_from_server - &gt; send_to_client。

到目前为止您编写的代码与原始代码的执行操作不同。具体来说,旧代码同时监听两个套接字上的读取。幸运的是,由于您使用的是ASIO,因此您不需要乱用线程。只需在两个套接字上同时发出async_read_some请求,并异步处理它们。