我想创建一个包含两个参数的函数/自定义类方法:
1)IM_ITAB类型ANY TABLE
2)IM_COMPONENT类型STRING
并返回1个参数:
1)EX_RANGE类型PIQ_SELOPT_T
所以,算法是这样的:
Mockito.when()
但是我想进一步改进该方法。如果导入的内部表有255列,则遍历该表将花费更长的时间。但是我只需要一列即可组成范围。
所以我想获取内部表的组件,然后仅选择一个组件,创建仅包含该组件的新线型,然后使用该线型创建内部表并复制。
这是与我要实现的目标相对应的伪代码:
Set<String> ordersBuy = mock(Set.class);
Set<String> ordersSell = mock(Set.class);
ArgumentCaptor<Function<CurrencyPairDTO, String >> getBase = ArgumentCaptor.forClass(Function.class);
ArgumentCaptor<Function<CurrencyPairDTO, String>> getCounter = ArgumentCaptor.forClass(Function.class);
ArgumentCaptor<Function<MyOrdersSmartDTO, Set<String>>> getSell = ArgumentCaptor.forClass(Function.class);
ArgumentCaptor<Function<MyOrdersSmartDTO, Set<String>>> getBuy = ArgumentCaptor.forClass(Function.class);
when(this.recalculateInMemoryBoardUtils.fillSetByMarginOrdersUsingFunctions(eq(instancesByUsername), eq(currencyBase), getBase.capture(), getSell.capture())).thenReturn(ordersSell);
when(this.recalculateInMemoryBoardUtils.fillSetByMarginOrdersUsingFunctions(eq(instancesByUsername), eq(currencyBase), getCounter.capture(), getBuy.capture())).thenReturn(ordersBuy);
如何使用RTTS“剪切”一个组件并创建新的线型?
答案 0 :(得分:0)
您使所有事情都变得过于复杂,不需要RTTS。
DEFINE make_range.
ex_range = VALUE #( BASE ex_range ( sign = 'I' option = 'EQ' low = &1 ) ).
END-OF-DEFINITION.
LOOP AT im_itab ASSIGNING FIELD-SYMBOL(<fs_line>).
ASSIGN COMPONENT im_component OF STRUCTURE <fs_line> TO FIELD-SYMBOL(<fs_field>).
CHECK sy-subrc = 0 AND <fs_field> IS NOT INITIAL.
make_range <fs_field>.
ENDLOOP.
是的,正如Sandra所说,使用RTTS不会获得任何性能,恰恰相反。
答案 1 :(得分:0)
Surprisingly, this variant turned out to be faster:
CLASS-METHODS make_range_variant_2
IMPORTING
sample TYPE table_type
column TYPE string
RETURNING
VALUE(result) TYPE range_type.
METHOD make_range_variant_2.
TYPES:
BEGIN OF narrow_structure_type,
content TYPE char32,
END OF narrow_structure_type.
TYPES narrow_table_type TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF narrow_structure_type WITH EMPTY KEY.
DATA narrow_table TYPE narrow_table_type.
DATA(mapping) =
VALUE cl_abap_corresponding=>mapping_table_value(
( kind = cl_abap_corresponding=>mapping_component srcname = column dstname = 'CONTENT' ) ).
DATA(mover) =
cl_abap_corresponding=>create_with_value(
source = sample
destination = narrow_table
mapping = mapping ).
mover->execute(
EXPORTING
source = sample
CHANGING
destination = narrow_table ).
LOOP AT narrow_table ASSIGNING FIELD-SYMBOL(<row>).
INSERT VALUE #(
sign = 'I'
option = 'EQ'
low = <row>-content )
INTO TABLE result.
ENDLOOP.
ENDMETHOD.
CL_ABAP_CORRESPONDING
delegates to a kernel function for the structure-to-structure move, which apparently is faster than the ABAP-native ASSIGN COMPONENT [...] OF STRUCTURE [...] TO FIELD-SYMBOL [...]
. The actual loop then seems to be faster because it uses fixed-name assignments.
Maybe somebody could verify.
答案 2 :(得分:0)
我不会去买Macro
。
Data:
lr_data type ref to data.
FIELD-SYMBOLS:
<lv_component> TYPE any,
<ls_data> TYPE any.
CREATE DATA lr_data LIKE LINE OF im_itab.
ASSIGN lr_data->* TO <ls_data>.
"Check whether im_component exists
ASSIGN COMPONENT im_component OF STRUCTURE <ls_data> TO <lv_component>.
CHECK sy-subrc EQ 0.
LOOP AT im_itab INTO <ls_data>.
APPEND VALUE #( sign = 'I' option = 'EQ' low = <lv_component> ) TO ex_range.
ENDLOOP.