因此,我正在将像这样的用户和角色作为数据库的种子。
public static void SeedUsers(this ModelBuilder modelBuilder)
{
var roles = new[]
{
new Role
{
Id = new Guid("5127599a-e956-4f5e-9385-1b8c6a74e4f1"),
RoleName = "Customer"
},
new Role
{
Id = new Guid("8634c476-20fa-4391-b8f7-8713abf61af0"),
RoleName = "Admin"
}
};
// customer password
byte[] customerPasswordHash = null;
byte[] customerPasswordSalt = null;
HashPassword("asd123", out customerPasswordHash, out customerPasswordSalt);
// admin password
byte[] adminPasswordHash = null;
byte[] adminPasswordSalt = null;
HashPassword("asd123", out adminPasswordHash, out adminPasswordSalt);
var users = new[]
{
new Users()
{
Id = new Guid("3b86f5a2-1978-46e3-a0b6-edbb6b558efc"),
FirstName = "John",
LastName = "Doe",
DepositedCash = 10000,
Email = "john@doe.com",
RoleId = roles[0].Id,
PasswordHash = customerPasswordHash,
PasswordSalt = customerPasswordSalt
},
new Users()
{
Id = new Guid("c643b944-53d9-4a0c-9922-3486558b9129"),
FirstName = "Admin",
LastName = "Admin",
DepositedCash = 10000,
Email = "admin@admin.com",
RoleId = roles[1].Id,
PasswordHash = adminPasswordHash,
PasswordSalt = adminPasswordSalt
}
};
modelBuilder.Entity<Role>()
.HasData(roles);
modelBuilder.Entity<Users>()
.HasData(users);
}
private static void HashPassword(string password, out byte[] passwordHash, out byte[] passwordSalt)
{
using (var hmac = new System.Security.Cryptography.HMACSHA512(Encoding.UTF8.GetBytes("predefined key")))
{
passwordSalt = hmac.Key;
passwordHash = hmac.ComputeHash(Encoding.UTF8.GetBytes(password));
}
}
我正在创建迁移并更新数据库。到目前为止一切顺利。
之后,当我创建另一个测试迁移时,不更改任何内容,它将创建具有相同数据的UpdateData方法。 Up
和Down
方法中的所有内容都相同。
using System;
using Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Migrations;
namespace Pizzeria.Data.Migrations
{
public partial class test : Migration
{
protected override void Up(MigrationBuilder migrationBuilder)
{
migrationBuilder.UpdateData(
table: "Users",
keyColumn: "Id",
keyValue: new Guid("3b86f5a2-1978-46e3-a0b6-edbb6b558efc"),
columns: new[] { "PasswordHash", "PasswordSalt" },
values: new object[] { new byte[] { 211, 141, 232, 166, 77, 237, 128, 211, 121, 45, 47, 68, 211, 202, 162, 3, 39, 214, 212, 153, 4, 199, 223, 213, 43, 233, 224, 21, 107, 10, 62, 220, 105, 27, 254, 137, 16, 208, 56, 42, 254, 211, 154, 27, 60, 135, 197, 224, 148, 99, 232, 246, 220, 121, 113, 103, 42, 117, 172, 240, 134, 14, 188, 25 }, new byte[] { 112, 114, 101, 100, 101, 102, 105, 110, 101, 100, 32, 107, 101, 121 } });
migrationBuilder.UpdateData(
table: "Users",
keyColumn: "Id",
keyValue: new Guid("c643b944-53d9-4a0c-9922-3486558b9129"),
columns: new[] { "PasswordHash", "PasswordSalt" },
values: new object[] { new byte[] { 211, 141, 232, 166, 77, 237, 128, 211, 121, 45, 47, 68, 211, 202, 162, 3, 39, 214, 212, 153, 4, 199, 223, 213, 43, 233, 224, 21, 107, 10, 62, 220, 105, 27, 254, 137, 16, 208, 56, 42, 254, 211, 154, 27, 60, 135, 197, 224, 148, 99, 232, 246, 220, 121, 113, 103, 42, 117, 172, 240, 134, 14, 188, 25 }, new byte[] { 112, 114, 101, 100, 101, 102, 105, 110, 101, 100, 32, 107, 101, 121 } });
}
protected override void Down(MigrationBuilder migrationBuilder)
{
migrationBuilder.UpdateData(
table: "Users",
keyColumn: "Id",
keyValue: new Guid("3b86f5a2-1978-46e3-a0b6-edbb6b558efc"),
columns: new[] { "PasswordHash", "PasswordSalt" },
values: new object[] { new byte[] { 211, 141, 232, 166, 77, 237, 128, 211, 121, 45, 47, 68, 211, 202, 162, 3, 39, 214, 212, 153, 4, 199, 223, 213, 43, 233, 224, 21, 107, 10, 62, 220, 105, 27, 254, 137, 16, 208, 56, 42, 254, 211, 154, 27, 60, 135, 197, 224, 148, 99, 232, 246, 220, 121, 113, 103, 42, 117, 172, 240, 134, 14, 188, 25 }, new byte[] { 112, 114, 101, 100, 101, 102, 105, 110, 101, 100, 32, 107, 101, 121 } });
migrationBuilder.UpdateData(
table: "Users",
keyColumn: "Id",
keyValue: new Guid("c643b944-53d9-4a0c-9922-3486558b9129"),
columns: new[] { "PasswordHash", "PasswordSalt" },
values: new object[] { new byte[] { 211, 141, 232, 166, 77, 237, 128, 211, 121, 45, 47, 68, 211, 202, 162, 3, 39, 214, 212, 153, 4, 199, 223, 213, 43, 233, 224, 21, 107, 10, 62, 220, 105, 27, 254, 137, 16, 208, 56, 42, 254, 211, 154, 27, 60, 135, 197, 224, 148, 99, 232, 246, 220, 121, 113, 103, 42, 117, 172, 240, 134, 14, 188, 25 }, new byte[] { 112, 114, 101, 100, 101, 102, 105, 110, 101, 100, 32, 107, 101, 121 } });
}
}
}
为什么更新用户而不做任何更改?我想念什么?
答案 0 :(得分:1)
您必须使用原始值作为种子,以避免这种情况:
site1(url).then(data=>{
console.log(data);
})
这样,EF Core会知道该值是固定值,从而生成一个迁移,并且不会在每次迁移中都进行更新。使用一种方法(此处为HashPassword)可以防止EF Core将其视为固定的。