尝试一切使此方法特别有效地使每种方法异步。 for(resultsHistory的const元素)也不起作用。
我正在尝试通过在其上运行foreach并执行mysql查询来修改前一个查询的结果数组。
但是,这需要等待查询完成。
有没有一种方法可以不用我为了等待查询完成而手动设置的setTimeout(function(){}来访问这些结果?
function getUserLikes(params, callback) {
var usersArrayCat = [];
console.log(`length of array ${params.length}`)
// 1 here means 1 request at a time
async.eachLimit(params, 1, function (element, cb) {
element.liked = 0;
var queryLiked = `SELECT * from users_likes WHERE user_id = \"${req.body.userid}\" AND product_id = \"${element.product_id}\"`;
connectionPromise.query(queryLiked, function (err, result) {
if (!result) {
} else if (result.length == 0) {
} else {
element.liked = result[0].userlike;
usersArrayCat.push(element);
// console.log(usersArrayCat);
cb();
}
})
}, function (err) {
if (err) return callback(err);
callback(null, usersArrayCat)
});
};
getUserLikes(resultsHistory, function (e) {
console.log(e);
});
if(!res.headersSent) {
setTimeout(function() {
res.send(JSON.stringify({"status": 200 ,"error": null, "top3":resultsHistory}));
}, 150);
}
答案 0 :(得分:0)
查看我的答案:
function getUserLikes(params, callback) {
var usersArrayCat = [];
console.log(`length of array ${params.length}`)
// 1 here means 1 request at a time
async.eachLimit(params, 1, function (element, cb) {
element.liked = 0;
var queryLiked = `SELECT * from users_likes WHERE user_id = \"${req.body.userid}\" AND product_id = \"${element.product_id}\"`;
connectionPromise.query(queryLiked, function (err, result) {
if (!result) {
} else if (result.length == 0) {
} else {
element.liked = result[0].userlike;
usersArrayCat.push(element);
// console.log(usersArrayCat);
}
cb();
})
}, function (err) {
if (err) return callback(err);
callback(null, usersArrayCat)
});
};
getUserLikes(resultsHistory, function (e, usersArrayCat) {
if (e) {
console.log(e);
return res.send({status: 400, error: e}); // your error response
}
console.log(usersArrayCat); // your usersArrayCat with liked property
res.send(JSON.stringify({ // why your need return a string intead of json object ???
"status": 200,
"error": null,
"top3": usersArrayCat // I think return `usersArrayCat` is a right way
}));
});
答案 1 :(得分:0)
设法使它像这样工作,但仍不确定这是否正确。
async function getUserLikes(resultsHistory) {
for (const element of resultsHistory) {
element.liked = 0;
let queryLiked = `SELECT * from users_likes WHERE user_id = \"${req.body.userid}\" AND product_id = \"${element.product_id}\"`;
let liked = await conn2.query(queryLiked);
if (liked[0]) {
element.liked = liked[0].userlike;
}
}
if(!res.headersSent) {
conn2.release();
let newres = resultsHistory.sort(
firstBy(function (v1, v2) { return v2.rating - v1.rating; })
.thenBy(function (v1, v2) { return v2.dranktimes - v1.dranktimes; })
).filter( function(history) {
return history.event === eventName;
}).slice(0, 3);
res.send({"status": 200 ,"error": null, "top3":newres});
}
}
getUserLikes(resultsHistory);