我一直在搜索堆栈溢出,试图了解类似问题的答案,但是我无法接近创建自己的解决方案。所以,希望您能帮助我。
前提:
我已经开发了一种算法,可以遍历15个变量,并为每个变量生成一个简单的OLS。然后,该算法再循环11次以产生相同的15个OLS回归,但X变量的滞后每次均增加一。我选择r ^ 2最高的自变量,并对3,4或5个变量使用最佳滞后时间
即
Y_t+1 - Y_t = B ( X_t+k - X_t) + e
我的数据集如下:
Regression = pd.DataFrame(np.random.randint(low=0, high=10, size=(100, 6)),
columns=['Y', 'X1', 'X2', 'X3', 'X4','X5'])
到目前为止,我已拟合的OLS回归使用以下代码:
Y = Regression['Y']
X = Regression[['X1','X2','X3']]
Model = sm.OLS(Y,X).fit()
predictions = Model.predict(X)
Model.summary()
问题在于,使用OLS,您可以获得负系数(我这样做)。我希望通过以下方法帮助您约束此模型:
sum(B_i) = 1
B_i >= 0
答案 0 :(得分:1)
根据评论,这是一个使用scipy的differential_evolution模块确定有界参数估计的示例。此模块在内部使用Latin Hypercube算法来确保对参数空间进行彻底搜索,并且需要在其中搜索范围,尽管这些范围可能很宽泛。默认情况下,differential_evolution模块将在内部使用边界调用curve_fit()结束-可以将其禁用-并且为了确保最终拟合的参数不受边界限制,本示例在不通过边界的情况下稍后对curve_fit进行调用。从打印的结果中可以看到,对differential_evolution的调用显示了第一个参数为-0.185的边界,而对后来的curve_fit()的调用的结果则不是这种情况。在您的情况下,可以将下界设为零,以使参数不为负,但是,如果代码导致参数达到或接近界限,则此示例所示的效果不是最佳的。
import numpy, scipy, matplotlib
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
from scipy.optimize import curve_fit
from scipy.optimize import differential_evolution
import warnings
xData = numpy.array([19.1647, 18.0189, 16.9550, 15.7683, 14.7044, 13.6269, 12.6040, 11.4309, 10.2987, 9.23465, 8.18440, 7.89789, 7.62498, 7.36571, 7.01106, 6.71094, 6.46548, 6.27436, 6.16543, 6.05569, 5.91904, 5.78247, 5.53661, 4.85425, 4.29468, 3.74888, 3.16206, 2.58882, 1.93371, 1.52426, 1.14211, 0.719035, 0.377708, 0.0226971, -0.223181, -0.537231, -0.878491, -1.27484, -1.45266, -1.57583, -1.61717])
yData = numpy.array([0.644557, 0.641059, 0.637555, 0.634059, 0.634135, 0.631825, 0.631899, 0.627209, 0.622516, 0.617818, 0.616103, 0.613736, 0.610175, 0.606613, 0.605445, 0.603676, 0.604887, 0.600127, 0.604909, 0.588207, 0.581056, 0.576292, 0.566761, 0.555472, 0.545367, 0.538842, 0.529336, 0.518635, 0.506747, 0.499018, 0.491885, 0.484754, 0.475230, 0.464514, 0.454387, 0.444861, 0.437128, 0.415076, 0.401363, 0.390034, 0.378698])
def func(t, n_0, L, offset): #exponential curve fitting function
return n_0*numpy.exp(-L*t) + offset
# function for genetic algorithm to minimize (sum of squared error)
def sumOfSquaredError(parameterTuple):
warnings.filterwarnings("ignore") # do not print warnings by genetic algorithm
val = func(xData, *parameterTuple)
return numpy.sum((yData - val) ** 2.0)
def generate_Initial_Parameters():
# min and max used for bounds
maxX = max(xData)
minX = min(xData)
maxY = max(yData)
minY = min(yData)
parameterBounds = []
parameterBounds.append([-0.185, maxX]) # seach bounds for n_0
parameterBounds.append([minX, maxX]) # seach bounds for L
parameterBounds.append([0.0, maxY]) # seach bounds for Offset
# "seed" the numpy random number generator for repeatable results
result = differential_evolution(sumOfSquaredError, parameterBounds, seed=3)
return result.x
# by default, differential_evolution completes by calling
# curve_fit() using parameter bounds
geneticParameters = generate_Initial_Parameters()
print('fit with parameter bounds (note the -0.185)')
print(geneticParameters)
print()
# second call to curve_fit made with no bounds for comparison
fittedParameters, pcov = curve_fit(func, xData, yData, geneticParameters)
print('re-fit with no parameter bounds')
print(fittedParameters)
print()
modelPredictions = func(xData, *fittedParameters)
absError = modelPredictions - yData
SE = numpy.square(absError) # squared errors
MSE = numpy.mean(SE) # mean squared errors
RMSE = numpy.sqrt(MSE) # Root Mean Squared Error, RMSE
Rsquared = 1.0 - (numpy.var(absError) / numpy.var(yData))
print()
print('RMSE:', RMSE)
print('R-squared:', Rsquared)
print()
##########################################################
# graphics output section
def ModelAndScatterPlot(graphWidth, graphHeight):
f = plt.figure(figsize=(graphWidth/100.0, graphHeight/100.0), dpi=100)
axes = f.add_subplot(111)
# first the raw data as a scatter plot
axes.plot(xData, yData, 'D')
# create data for the fitted equation plot
xModel = numpy.linspace(min(xData), max(xData))
yModel = func(xModel, *fittedParameters)
# now the model as a line plot
axes.plot(xModel, yModel)
axes.set_xlabel('X Data') # X axis data label
axes.set_ylabel('Y Data') # Y axis data label
plt.show()
plt.close('all') # clean up after using pyplot
graphWidth = 800
graphHeight = 600
ModelAndScatterPlot(graphWidth, graphHeight)
答案 1 :(得分:0)
我不知道您可以轻松限制系数,我有两种解决方案,
1-使用导致负系数的时间序列的倒数(1 / x)。这将要求您先进行正态回归,然后逆转具有负关系的关系。获取权重并进行wi / sum(wi)。
2-似乎您正在处理时间序列,请使用对数差异(np.log(ts).diff()。dropna())作为输入并获得权重。如有必要,将其除以权重之和,然后将其估计值还原为np.exp(predicted_ts.cumsum())。
答案 2 :(得分:0)
这很好用
from scipy.optimize import minimize
# Define the Model
model = lambda b, X: b[0] * X[:,0] + b[1] * X[:,1] + b[2] * X[:,2]
# The objective Function to minimize (least-squares regression)
obj = lambda b, Y, X: np.sum(np.abs(Y-model(b, X))**2)
# Bounds: b[0], b[1], b[2] >= 0
bnds = [(0, None), (0, None), (0, None)]
# Constraint: b[0] + b[1] + b[2] - 1 = 0
cons = [{"type": "eq", "fun": lambda b: b[0]+b[1]+b[2] - 1}]
# Initial guess for b[1], b[2], b[3]:
xinit = np.array([0, 0, 1])
res = minimize(obj, args=(Y, X), x0=xinit, bounds=bnds, constraints=cons)
print(f"b1={res.x[0]}, b2={res.x[1]}, b3={res.x[2]}")
#Save the coefficients for further analysis on goodness of fit
beta1 = res.x[0]
beta2 = res.x[1]
beta3 = res.x[2]