我有一些功能
bar :: MyType -> MyType -> [MyType]
我想要另一个功能:
foo :: [MyType] -> [MyType]
foo xs = do x <- xs
y <- xs
bar x y
是否可以在不使用foo
表示法的情况下编写do
?我在考虑类似liftA2
之类的方法,但这行不通。
答案 0 :(得分:8)
我们可以使用来自do-block的算法转换,如Haskell report中所述:
foo :: [MType] -> [MType]
foo xs = xs >>= \x -> xs >>= \y -> bar x y
但是我们可以通过省略y
变量来减少lambda表达式的数量:
foo :: [MType] -> [MType]
foo xs = xs >>= \x -> xs >>= bar x
,我们也可以省略x
变量,方法是将\x -> xs >>= bar x
写为(xs >>=) . bar
foo :: [MType] -> [MType]
foo xs = xs >>= ((xs >>=) . bar)
或者像@M.Aroosi所说,我们可以结合使用join :: Monad m => m (m a) -> m a
和liftA2 :: Applicative f => (a -> b -> c) -> f a -> f b -> f c
:
foo :: [MType] -> [MType]
foo xs = join (liftA2 bar xs xs)
答案 1 :(得分:2)
对于bar
,您还可以使用以下模式来改变变量:
Arity 2
-- bar :: [MType] -> [MType]
foo :: [MType] -> [MType]
foo xs = join $ bar <$> xs <*> xs
Arity 3
-- bar :: [MType] -> [MType] -> [MType]
foo :: [MType] -> [MType]
foo xs = join $ bar <$> xs <*> xs <*> xs
以此类推。
我喜欢这样,因为它比硬编码的liftA2
容易扩展。