简化,我有这两个Extension
方法:
public static class Extensions
{
public static string GetString(this Exception e)
{
return "Standard!!!";
}
public static string GetString(this TimeoutException e)
{
return "TimeOut!!!";
}
}
以下是我使用它们的地方:
try
{
throw new TimeoutException();
}
catch (Exception e)
{
Type t = e.GetType(); //At debugging this a TimeoutException
Console.WriteLine(e.GetString()); //Prints: Standard
}
我有更多GetString()
个扩展名。
我的try{...}catch{...}
变得越来越大,基本上我在寻找方法将它缩短为1个根据异常类型调用扩展名的catch。
有没有办法在运行时调用正确的扩展方法?
答案 0 :(得分:4)
正如Yacoub Massad建议您可以使用dynamic
,因为使用dynamic
方法重载决议在运行时通过后期绑定延迟。:
public static class Extensions
{
public static string GetString<T>(this T e) where T : Exception
{
// dynamic method overload resolution is deferred at runtime through late binding.
return GetStringCore((dynamic)e);
}
static string GetStringCore(Exception e)
{
return "Standard!!!";
}
static string GetStringCore(TimeoutException e)
{
return "TimeOut!!!";
}
static string GetStringCore(InvalidOperationException e)
{
return "Invalid!!!";
}
}
这应该成功。
答案 1 :(得分:-1)
扩展方法在这里是错误的工具。
我会促进使用多态来解决你的问题:
public abstract class BaseException : Exception
{
public abstract string GetString();
}
public sealed class TimeoutException : BaseException
{
public override string GetString() => "TimeOut!!!";
}
public sealed class MyException : BaseException
{
public override string GetString() => "Standard!!!";
}
用法
try
{
throw new TimeoutException(); //or whatever BaseException's children
}
catch (BaseException e)
{
//here I'm assuming you know that you are swallowing the exception (which may be an anti-pattern)
Console.WriteLine(e.GetString());
}
看起来你无法完全控制抛出异常的时间。另一种可能性是为每个行为添加1个catch子句(而不是每个异常类型)并删除GetString()
:
try
{
throw new TimeoutException();
}
catch (Exception e) when (e is ArgumentNullException || e is FormatException)
{
//do something
}
catch (Exception e) when (e is TimeoutException)
{
//do something
}
catch (Exception e)
{
throw new NotImplementedException($"Hey Mike, write something for {e.GetType()}, will ya?"); //idea from Jeroen
}