我试图编写最佳算法来选择列表中较大的第i个元素。 例如,如果array = [4,3,5,7]并且我搜索第二个,则函数将返回4.
我假设列表中只有不同的数字
问题在于:
该功能有时会返回无。
这是我的代码(我认为第一个函数效果很好)。
from random import shuffle
def partition(array, leftend, rightend, pivot):
""" I tested this one and it should work fine """
i = leftend
pivotindex = array.index(pivot) # only works if all values in array unique
array[pivotindex] = array[leftend]
array[leftend] = pivot
for j in range(leftend+1, rightend):
if array[j] < pivot:
temp = array[j]
array[j] = array[i]
array[i] = temp
i += 1
pivotindex = array.index(pivot) # only works if all values in array unique
leftendval = array[pivotindex] # Take the value of the pivot
array[pivotindex] = array[i]
array[i] = leftendval
return array
def RSelect(array, n, statistic_order):
""" list * int * int
statistic_order = the i th element i'm searching for """
new_array = [] # is used at the end of the function
if n == 1:
return array[0]
array_temp = array # Allows to have a shuffled list and
shuffle(array_temp)
pivot = array_temp[0] # Allows to have a random pivot
partition(array,0,n,pivot)
j = array.index(pivot)
if j == statistic_order:
return pivot
elif j > statistic_order:
for k in range(0,j):
new_array.append(array[k])
RSelect(new_array,j,statistic_order)
elif j < statistic_order:
for k in range(j+1,n):
new_array.append(array[k])
RSelect(new_array,(n-j)-1,statistic_order-j)
答案 0 :(得分:0)
有些事情是错的:
我还改变了一些事情,比如无用的参数,或者用可以用切片写的循环。
这是最终的代码,检查更改以确保您理解它。
RSelect:
def RSelect(array, statistic_order):
""" list * int * int
statistic_order = the i th element i'm searching for """
n = len(array)
if n == 1:
return array[0]
array_temp = array # Allows to have a shuffled list and
shuffle(array_temp)
pivot = array_temp[0] # Allows to have a random pivot
array = partition(array,0,n,pivot) # Changes here, does not impact the result, but for readability
j = array.index(pivot)
# print(array, j, statistic_order, end = '\t')
if j == statistic_order:
return pivot
elif j > statistic_order:
assert j > 0
# print((array[0:j]), pivot)
return RSelect(array[0:j],statistic_order) # Changes here : return
elif j < statistic_order:
assert j+1 < n
# print(pivot, (array[j+1:n]))
return RSelect(array[j+1:n],statistic_order-j-1) # Changes here : return, -j-1
主要:
if __name__ == "__main__":
from sys import argv
if len(argv) > 1:
n = int(argv[1])
arr = [2, 1, 3, 5, 4]
print(RSelect(arr[:], n))
为此目的,O(n)中还存在另一种算法:见this
编辑:拼写错误&amp; amp;关于复杂性的纠正
答案 1 :(得分:0)
代码工作正常但仍然是,结果从0开始。 例如,如果arr = [2,3,5,6]并且我要求RSelect(arr,4,2),答案将是5而不是3.我不知道为什么。
以下是更新的代码:
from random import shuffle
def partition(array, leftend, rightend, pivot):
i = leftend
pivotindex = array.index(pivot) # only works if all values in array unique
array[pivotindex] = array[leftend]
array[leftend] = pivot
for j in range(leftend+1, rightend):
if array[j] < pivot:
temp = array[j]
array[j] = array[i]
array[i] = temp
i += 1
pivotindex = array.index(pivot) # only works if all values in array unique
leftendval = array[pivotindex] # Take the value of the pivot
array[pivotindex] = array[i]
array[i] = leftendval
def RSelect(array, n, statistic_order):
""" list * int * int
statistic_order = the i th element i'm searching for """
if n == 1:
return array[0]
array_temp = array # Allows to have a shuffled list
shuffle(array_temp)
pivot = array_temp[0] # Allows to have a random pivot
partition(array,0,n,pivot)
j = array.index(pivot)
if j == statistic_order:
return pivot
elif j > statistic_order:
return RSelect(array[0:j],j,statistic_order)
elif j < statistic_order:
return RSelect(array[j+1:n],(n-j)-1,statistic_order-j-1)