我正在构建一个支持numa的处理器,它绑定到给定的套接字并接受lambdas。这就是我所做的:
#include <numa.h>
#include <chrono>
#include <cstdlib>
#include <iostream>
#include <thread>
#include <vector>
using namespace std;
unsigned nodes = numa_num_configured_nodes();
unsigned cores = numa_num_configured_cpus();
unsigned cores_per_node = cores / nodes;
int main(int argc, char* argv[]) {
putenv("OMP_PLACES=sockets(1)");
cout << numa_available() << endl; // returns 0
numa_set_interleave_mask(numa_all_nodes_ptr);
int size = 200000000;
for (auto i = 0; i < nodes; ++i) {
auto t = thread([&]() {
// binding to given socket
numa_bind(numa_parse_nodestring(to_string(i).c_str()));
vector<int> v(size, 0);
cout << "node #" << i << ": on CPU " << sched_getcpu() << endl;
#pragma omp parallel for num_threads(cores_per_node) proc_bind(master)
for (auto i = 0; i < 200000000; ++i) {
for (auto j = 0; j < 10; ++j) {
v[i]++;
v[i] *= v[i];
v[i] *= v[i];
}
}
});
t.join();
}
}
但是,所有线程都在套接字0上运行。似乎numa_bind
没有将当前线程绑定到给定套接字。第二个numa处理器 - Numac 1
输出node #1: on CPU 0
,它应该在CPU 1上。那么出了什么问题?
答案 0 :(得分:0)
这对我来说完全符合我的预期:
#include <cassert>
#include <iostream>
#include <numa.h>
#include <omp.h>
#include <sched.h>
int main() {
assert (numa_available() != -1);
auto nodes = numa_num_configured_nodes();
auto cores = numa_num_configured_cpus();
auto cores_per_node = cores / nodes;
omp_set_nested(1);
#pragma omp parallel num_threads(nodes)
{
auto outer_thread_id = omp_get_thread_num();
numa_run_on_node(outer_thread_id);
#pragma omp parallel num_threads(cores_per_node)
{
auto inner_thread_id = omp_get_thread_num();
#pragma omp critical
std::cout
<< "Thread " << outer_thread_id << ":" << inner_thread_id
<< " core: " << sched_getcpu() << std::endl;
assert(outer_thread_id == numa_node_of_cpu(sched_getcpu()));
}
}
}
程序首先在我的双插槽服务器上创建2个(外部)线程。然后,它将它们绑定到不同的套接字(NUMA节点)。最后,它将每个线程分成20个(内部)线程,因为每个CPU有10个物理内核并启用了超线程。
所有内部线程都在与其父线程相同的套接字上运行。对于外部线程0,核心0-9和20-29,以及外部线程1的核心10-19和30-39。(sched_getcpu()
返回我的0-39范围内的虚拟核心数情况)。
请注意,没有C ++ 11线程,只有纯OpenMP。