我有ff:
func getSlice(distinctSymbols []string) []symbols {
// Prepare connection
stmt1, err := db.Prepare("Select count(*) from stockticker_daily where symbol = $1;")
checkError(err)
defer stmt1.Close()
stmt2, err := db.Prepare("Select date from stockticker_daily where symbol = $1 order by date asc limit 1;")
checkError(err)
defer stmt2.Close()
var symbolsSlice []symbols
c := make(chan symbols)
for _, symbol := range distinctSymbols {
go worker(symbol, stmt1, stmt2, c)
**symbolsFromChannel := <-c**
**symbolsSlice = append(symbolsSlice, symbolsFromChannel})**
}
return symbolsSlice
}
func worker(symbol string, stmt1 *sql.Stmt, stmt2 *sql.Stmt, symbolsChan chan symbols) {
var countdp int
var earliestdate string
row := stmt1.QueryRow(symbol)
if err := row.Scan(&countdp); err != nil {
log.Fatal(err)
}
row = stmt2.QueryRow(symbol)
if err := row.Scan(&earliestdate); err != nil {
log.Fatal(err)
}
symbolsChan <- symbols{symbol, countdp, earliestdate}
}
请看第一个函数,我知道它不会像我预期的那样工作,因为行symbolsFromChannel := <-c
将阻塞直到它从通道接收,因此goroutine上的迭代{{1除非删除块,否则将不会继续。这样做的最佳或正确方法是什么?
答案 0 :(得分:1)
只需循环两次,例如
for _, symbol := range distinctSymbols {
go worker(symbol, stmt1, stmt2, c)
}
for range distinctSymbols {
symbolsSlice = append(symbolsSlice, <-c)
}