我为.Net CF运行了一些测试。基本上,我想比较,foreach,扩展方法ForEach和LINQ查询。这是整个代码(你可以跳过它,以达到困扰我的地步)
namespace ForEachForLINQPerTest
{
class IntBox
{
public int fieldX;
public int PropertyX { get; set; }
}
public partial class MainPage : PhoneApplicationPage
{
/// <summary>
/// size of tested List
/// </summary>
public const int TEST_SIZE = 1000000;
//
private List<int> m_intList = new List<int>(TEST_SIZE);
//
private List<IntBox> m_intBoxList = new List<IntBox>(TEST_SIZE);
//
private Stopwatch m_stopwatch = null;
// Constructor
public MainPage()
{
InitializeComponent();
for (int i = 0; i < TEST_SIZE; ++i)
{
m_intBoxList.Add( new IntBox());
m_intList.Add(0);
}
}
private void startButton_Click(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)
{
var forTest = ForTest(); // Jitter preheat
forTest = ForTest();
forResultTextBlock.Text = forTest;
var foreachTest = ForEachTest();
foreachTest = ForEachTest();
foreachResultTextBlock.Text = foreachTest;
var exTest = Extenstion();
exTest = Extenstion();
ExtensionResultTextBlock.Text = exTest;
var linqTest = LINQTest();
linqTest = LINQTest();
LINQResultTextBlock.Text = linqTest;
}
private string LINQTest()
{
m_stopwatch = new Stopwatch();
m_stopwatch.Start();
long temp = 0;
var result = from x in m_intList
select temp += x;
m_stopwatch.Stop();
var intListTime = m_stopwatch.ElapsedMilliseconds;
m_stopwatch.Reset();
result.ToList();
m_stopwatch.Start();
var result2 = from x in m_intBoxList
select temp += x.fieldX;
m_stopwatch.Stop();
var intBoxListFieldTime = m_stopwatch.ElapsedMilliseconds;
m_stopwatch.Reset();
result2.ToList();
m_stopwatch.Start();
var result3 = from x in m_intBoxList
select temp += x.PropertyX;
m_stopwatch.Stop();
var intBoxListPropertyTime = m_stopwatch.ElapsedMilliseconds;
m_stopwatch.Reset();
result3.ToList();
return String.Format("LINQ test List<int> = {0} \n List<IntBox> field = {1} \n List<IntBos> property = {2}", intListTime, intBoxListFieldTime, intBoxListPropertyTime);
}
private string Extenstion()
{
m_stopwatch = new Stopwatch();
m_stopwatch.Start();
long temp = 0;
m_intList.ForEach(i => temp += i);
m_stopwatch.Stop();
var intListTime = m_stopwatch.ElapsedMilliseconds;
m_stopwatch.Reset();
m_stopwatch.Start();
m_intBoxList.ForEach(i => temp += i.fieldX);
m_stopwatch.Stop();
var intBoxListFieldTime = m_stopwatch.ElapsedMilliseconds;
m_stopwatch.Reset();
m_stopwatch.Start();
m_intBoxList.ForEach(i => temp += i.PropertyX);
m_stopwatch.Stop();
var intBoxListPropertyTime = m_stopwatch.ElapsedMilliseconds;
m_stopwatch.Reset();
return String.Format("Extenstion test List<int> = {0} \n List<IntBox> field = {1} \n List<IntBos> property = {2}", intListTime, intBoxListFieldTime, intBoxListPropertyTime);
}
private string ForEachTest()
{
m_stopwatch = new Stopwatch();
long temp = 0;
m_stopwatch.Start();
foreach(int item in m_intList)
{
temp += item;
}
m_stopwatch.Stop();
var intListTime = m_stopwatch.ElapsedMilliseconds;
m_stopwatch.Reset();
m_stopwatch.Start();
foreach (IntBox item in m_intBoxList)
{
temp += item.fieldX;
}
m_stopwatch.Stop();
var intBoxListFieldTime = m_stopwatch.ElapsedMilliseconds;
m_stopwatch.Reset();
m_stopwatch.Start();
foreach (IntBox item in m_intBoxList)
{
temp += item.PropertyX;
}
m_stopwatch.Stop();
var intBoxListPropertyTime = m_stopwatch.ElapsedMilliseconds;
m_stopwatch.Reset();
return String.Format("ForEach test List<int> = {0} \n List<IntBox> field = {1} \n List<IntBos> property = {2}", intListTime, intBoxListFieldTime, intBoxListPropertyTime);
}
private string ForTest()
{
m_stopwatch = new Stopwatch();
m_stopwatch.Start();
long temp = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < TEST_SIZE; ++i)
{
temp += m_intList[i];
}
m_stopwatch.Stop();
var intListTime = m_stopwatch.ElapsedMilliseconds;
m_stopwatch.Reset();
m_stopwatch.Start();
for (int i = 0; i < m_intList.Count; ++i)
{
temp += m_intBoxList[i].fieldX;
}
m_stopwatch.Stop();
var intBoxListFieldTime = m_stopwatch.ElapsedMilliseconds;
m_stopwatch.Reset();
m_stopwatch.Start();
for (int i = 0; i < m_intList.Count; ++i)
{
temp += m_intBoxList[i].PropertyX;
}
m_stopwatch.Stop();
var intBoxListPropertyTime = m_stopwatch.ElapsedMilliseconds;
m_stopwatch.Reset();
return String.Format("For loop test List<int> = {0} \n List<IntBox> field = {1} \n List<IntBos> property = {2}", intListTime, intBoxListFieldTime, intBoxListPropertyTime);
}
}
}
在这里我很困惑
m_stopwatch = new Stopwatch();
m_stopwatch.Start();
long temp = 0;
var result = from x in m_intList
select temp += x;
m_stopwatch.Stop();
var intListTime = m_stopwatch.ElapsedMilliseconds;
m_stopwatch.Reset();
result.ToList();
输出是:
对于循环测试列表= 93
列表字段= 119 // ref - &gt;领域
List property = 136 // ref - &gt; property - &gt;字段属性只是CF的功能
ForEach test List = 88
列表字段= 140
清单属性= 152
扩展测试列表= 176
//调用另一个函数。
列表字段= 220
清单属性= 239
LINQ测试列表= 0为什么?
列表字段= 163
清单属性= 165
为什么intListTime == 0?我究竟做错了什么?字段和属性的最后两个值几乎相同(运行几次)。这是否意味着LINQ查询中的PropertyX是在线评估的?
答案 0 :(得分:3)
第一次为零,因为表达式树是在编译时构建的,并且会在ToList
调用中评估您未包含在计时中。
对于字段和属性访问时间,我不会太担心 - 实际上,在发布版本中,简单的属性访问器将被内联,提供与字段访问相同的性能。对于linq情况,您可能会看到相同的性能,因为linq内部可能会将属性/字段访问转换为方法调用,并且会导致相同的时序(因为我相信与字段/ prop相比,方法调用开销可能会很大访问。
答案 1 :(得分:2)
这称为“延期执行”。 linq语句在需要之前不会被评估。在停止时钟之前移动ToList,时间会上升