我创建了一个scipy.stats.rv_continuous
子类,它似乎正在做我想要的,但它非常慢。代码和测试结果如下。
我使用(断电幂律)的分布函数很容易集成和计算属性,那么是否有另一种内部方法,我应该使用分析值进行子类化以使其更快?文档不清楚rvs
是如何实际绘制的,但可能是它找到cdf
的倒数。
class Broken_Power_Law(sp.stats.rv_continuous):
def __init__(self, slopes, breaks, name='Broken_Power_Law'):
"""
Here `slopes` are the power-law indices for each section, and
`breaks` are the edges of each section such that `slopes[0]` applies
between `breaks[0]` and `breaks[1]`, etc.
"""
super().__init__(a=np.min(breaks), b=np.max(breaks), name=name)
nums = len(slopes)
# Calculate the proper normalization of the PDF semi-analytically
pdf_norms = np.array([np.power(breaks[ii], slopes[ii-1] - slopes[ii]) if ii > 0 else 1.0
for ii in range(nums)])
pdf_norms = np.cumprod(pdf_norms)
# The additive offsets to calculate CDF values
cdf_offsets = np.array([(an/(alp+1))*(np.power(breaks[ii+1], alp+1) -
np.power(breaks[ii], alp+1))
for ii, (alp, an) in enumerate(zip(slopes, pdf_norms))])
off_sum = cdf_offsets.sum()
cdf_offsets = np.cumsum(cdf_offsets)
pdf_norms /= off_sum
cdf_offsets /= off_sum
self.breaks = breaks
self.slopes = slopes
self.pdf_norms = pdf_norms
self.cdf_offsets = cdf_offsets
self.num_segments = nums
return
def _pdf(self, xx):
mm = np.atleast_1d(xx)
yy = np.zeros_like(mm)
# For each power-law, calculate the distribution in that region
for ii in range(self.num_segments):
idx = (self.breaks[ii] < mm) & (mm <= self.breaks[ii+1])
aa = self.slopes[ii]
an = self.pdf_norms[ii]
yy[idx] = an * np.power(mm[idx], aa)
return yy
def _cdf(self, xx):
mm = np.atleast_1d(xx)
yy = np.zeros_like(mm)
off = 0.0
# For each power-law, calculate the cumulative dist in that region
for ii in range(self.num_segments):
# incorporate the cumulative offset from previous segments
off = self.cdf_offsets[ii-1] if ii > 0 else 0.0
idx = (self.breaks[ii] < mm) & (mm <= self.breaks[ii+1])
aa = self.slopes[ii]
an = self.pdf_norms[ii]
ap1 = aa + 1
yy[idx] = (an/(ap1)) * (np.power(mm[idx], ap1) - np.power(self.breaks[ii], ap1)) + off
return yy
测试时:
> test1 = sp.stats.norm()
> %timeit rvs = test1.rvs(size=100)
46.3 µs ± 1.87 µs per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 10000 loops each)
> test2 = Broken_Power_Law([-1.3, -2.2, -2.7], [0.08, 0.5, 1.0, 150.0])
> %timeit rvs = test2.rvs(size=100)
200 ms ± 8.57 ms per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 1 loop each)
即。慢5000倍!!!
答案 0 :(得分:1)
一种解决方案是覆盖_rvs
方法本身,并使用分析公式使用inverse transform sampling绘制样本:
def _rvs(self, size=None):
"""Invert the CDF (semi)-analytically to draw samples from distribution.
"""
if size is None:
size = self._size
rands = np.random.uniform(size=size)
samps = np.zeros_like(rands)
# Go over each segment region, find the region each random-number belongs in based on
# the offset values
for ii in range(self.num_segments):
lo = self.cdf_offsets[ii]
hi = self.cdf_offsets[ii+1]
idx = (lo <= rands) & (rands < hi)
mlo = self.breaks[ii]
aa = self.slopes[ii]
an = self.pdf_norms[ii]
ap1 = aa + 1
vals = (ap1/an) * (rands[idx] - lo) + np.power(mlo, ap1)
samps[idx] = np.power(vals, 1.0/ap1)
return samps
速度与内置采样几乎相同,
> %timeit rvs = test3.rvs(size=100)
56.8 µs ± 1 µs per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 10000 loops each)