Codacy bad给予super的第一个论点

时间:2017-10-05 07:30:27

标签: python optimization codacy

在通过编码审查某些代码时,Codacy为以下代码提出了一个问题:

module['exports'] = function testbot(hook) {

var request = require('request');
// The parameters passed in via the slash command POST request.
var params = hook.params;

data = {
    "response_type": "ephemeral",
    "text": "Immediate Response"
}
hook.res.setHeader('Content-Type', 'application/json');
console.log("returning immediate response")
hook.res.write(JSON.stringify(data), 'utf8', delay(params));
//calling end() here sends the immediate response but the POST never happens.
// but if end() is called below instead slack gives a timeout error but the POST succeeds.
//hook.res.end()

//test with 3.5 second delay
function delay(params) {
    setTimeout(function () {post_response(params)},3500);
}

function post_response(params) {

    console.log("posting delayed response")
    // Set up the options for the HTTP request.
    var options = {
        // Use the Webhook URL from the Slack Incoming Webhooks integration.
        uri: params.response_url,
        method: 'POST',
        // Slack expects a JSON payload with a "text" property.
        json: {"response_type":"in_channel", "text":"Delayed response","parse":"full"}
    };


    // Make the POST request to the Slack incoming webhook.
    request(options, function (error, response, body) {
        // Pass error back to client if request endpoint can't be reached.
        if (error) {
            console.log(error);
            hook.res.end(error.message);
        } else {
            console.log("post OK");
        }
        // calling end() here sends the POST but the immediate response is lost to a slack timeout error.
        hook.res.end()
    })
};
}

通过以下说明:

  

为什么这是一个问题?

     

例如,使用基类作为第一个参数调用super()是   错误:

def MyClass(OldClass):
    def __init__(self, arg1, arg2, *args, **kwargs)
        self.arg1 = arg1
        self.arg2 = arg2
        super(OldClass, self).__init__(*args, **kwargs)
     

应该是:

class AnotherOldStyleClass(OldStyleClass):
    def __init__(self):
        super(OldStyleClass, self).__init__() The super invocation 

似乎要我这样做:

super(AnotherOldStyleClass, self).__init__()

或许这个:

def MyClass(OldClass):
    def __init__(self, arg1, arg2, *args, **kwargs)
        self.arg1 = arg1
        self.arg2 = arg2
        super(OldClass, self).__init__(*args, **kwargs)

有人能告诉我哪些是正确的以及为什么这是首选行为?

作为参考,docs就是我使用选项2找到的例子。

编辑:这是我的代码,因为它看起来完全正确。这解释了我的错误:

def MyClass(OldClass):
    def __init__(self, arg1, arg2, *args, **kwargs)
        super(MyClass, self).__init__(*args, **kwargs)
        self.arg1 = arg1
        self.arg2 = arg2

为什么推荐这个?

1 个答案:

答案 0 :(得分:0)

我希望下一个例子能解释差异

class Grandparent(object):
    def hello(self):
        print "hi, I am Grandparent"

class Parent(Grandparent):
    def hello(self):
        print "hi, I am Parent"

class Child(Parent):
    def test(self):
        super(Parent, self).hello()   # print "hi, I am Grandparent"
        super(Child, self).hello()  # print "hi, I am Parent"

    def proper_way_to_do_same(self):
        Grandparent.hello(self)   # print "hi, I am Grandparent"
        Parent.hello(self)  # print "hi, I am Parent"