我正在试图找出一种方法来构建我的数据,以便它可以进行模型绑定。我的问题是我必须创建一个查询过滤器,它可以表示数据中的多个表达式。
例如:
x => (x.someProperty == true&& x.someOtherProperty == false)|| x.UserId == 2
x => (x.someProperty&& x.anotherProperty)|| (x.userId == 3&& x.userIsActive)
我已经创建了这个代表所有表达式的结构,我的问题是如何才能使它成为它的属性Model Bindable
public enum FilterCondition
{
Equals,
}
public enum ExpressionCombine
{
And = 0,
Or
}
public interface IFilterResolver<T>
{
Expression<Func<T, bool>> ResolveExpression();
}
public class QueryTreeNode<T> : IFilterResolver<T>
{
public string PropertyName { get; set; }
public FilterCondition FilterCondition { get; set; }
public string Value { get; set; }
public bool isNegated { get; set; }
public Expression<Func<T, bool>> ResolveExpression()
{
return this.BuildSimpleFilter();
}
}
//TODO: rename this class
public class QueryTreeBranch<T> : IFilterResolver<T>
{
public QueryTreeBranch(IFilterResolver<T> left, IFilterResolver<T> right, ExpressionCombine combinor)
{
this.Left = left;
this.Right = right;
this.Combinor = combinor;
}
public IFilterResolver<T> Left { get; set; }
public IFilterResolver<T> Right { get; set; }
public ExpressionCombine Combinor { get; set; }
public Expression<Func<T, bool>> ResolveExpression()
{
var leftExpression = Left.ResolveExpression();
var rightExpression = Right.ResolveExpression();
return leftExpression.Combine(rightExpression, Combinor);
}
}
我的左边一个正确的成员只需要能够解析为IResolvable,但模型绑定器只能绑定到具体类型。我知道我可以写一个自定义模型绑定器,但我更喜欢只有一个有效的结构。
我知道我可以通过json作为解决方案,但作为一项要求我不能
有没有办法可以优化这个结构,以便在模型可绑定时它仍然可以表示所有简单表达式?或者是否有一种简单的方法可以应用这种结构,以便它可以与模型绑定器一起使用?
修改 万一有人想知道,我的表达式构建器有一个成员表达式的白名单,它会被过滤掉。动态过滤工作我只是想找到一种自然地绑定这个结构的方法,这样我的Controller就可以接受QueryTreeBranch或者接受一个准确表示相同数据的结构。
public class FilterController
{
[HttpGet]
[ReadRoute("")]
public Entity[] GetList(QueryTreeBranch<Entity> queryRoot)
{
//queryRoot no bind :/
}
}
目前IFilterResolver有2个实现需要根据传递的数据动态选择
我正在寻找最接近开箱即用的WebApi / MVC框架的解决方案。优选的一个不要求我将输入调整到另一个结构以生成我的表达
答案 0 :(得分:6)
乍一看,您可以在DTO上拆分过滤逻辑,其中包含一个独立于实体类型的表达式树,以及一个依赖于类型的Expression<Func<T, bool>>
生成器。因此,我们可以避免使DTO变得通用和多态,从而导致困难。
可以注意到,您对IFilterResolver<T>
使用了多态(2个实现),因为您想说,过滤树的每个节点都是叶子或分支(这也称为{{3} })。
<强>模型强>
好的,如果这个特定的实现导致问题,让我们尝试另一个:
public class QueryTreeNode
{
public NodeType Type { get; set; }
public QueryTreeBranch Branch { get; set; }
public QueryTreeLeaf Leaf { get; set; }
}
public enum NodeType
{
Branch, Leaf
}
当然,您需要验证此类型号。
所以节点是分支或叶子(我在这里略微简化了叶子):
public class QueryTreeBranch
{
public QueryTreeNode Left { get; set; }
public QueryTreeNode Right { get; set; }
public ExpressionCombine Combinor { get; set; }
}
public class QueryTreeLeaf
{
public string PropertyName { get; set; }
public string Value { get; set; }
}
public enum ExpressionCombine
{
And = 0, Or
}
上面的DTO从代码创建起来不太方便,因此可以使用以下类来生成这些对象:
public static class QueryTreeHelper
{
public static QueryTreeNode Leaf(string property, int value)
{
return new QueryTreeNode
{
Type = NodeType.Leaf,
Leaf = new QueryTreeLeaf
{
PropertyName = property,
Value = value.ToString()
}
};
}
public static QueryTreeNode Branch(QueryTreeNode left, QueryTreeNode right)
{
return new QueryTreeNode
{
Type = NodeType.Branch,
Branch = new QueryTreeBranch
{
Left = left,
Right = right
}
};
}
}
查看强>
绑定这样的模型应该没有问题(ASP.Net MVC适用于递归模型,请参阅disjoint union)。例如。跟随虚拟视图(将它们放在\Views\Shared\EditorTemplates
文件夹中)。
对于分支:
@model WebApplication1.Models.QueryTreeBranch
<h4>Branch</h4>
<div style="border-left-style: dotted">
@{
<div>@Html.EditorFor(x => x.Left)</div>
<div>@Html.EditorFor(x => x.Right)</div>
}
</div>
对于叶子:
@model WebApplication1.Models.QueryTreeLeaf
<div>
@{
<div>@Html.LabelFor(x => x.PropertyName)</div>
<div>@Html.EditorFor(x => x.PropertyName)</div>
<div>@Html.LabelFor(x => x.Value)</div>
<div>@Html.EditorFor(x => x.Value)</div>
}
</div>
对于节点:
@model WebApplication1.Models.QueryTreeNode
<div style="margin-left: 15px">
@{
if (Model.Type == WebApplication1.Models.NodeType.Branch)
{
<div>@Html.EditorFor(x => x.Branch)</div>
}
else
{
<div>@Html.EditorFor(x => x.Leaf)</div>
}
}
</div>
样本用法:
@using (Html.BeginForm("Post"))
{
<div>@Html.EditorForModel()</div>
}
<强>控制器强>
最后,您可以实现一个表达式生成器,它采用过滤DTO和类型T
,例如来自字符串:
public class SomeRepository
{
public TEntity[] GetAllEntities<TEntity>()
{
// Somehow select a collection of entities of given type TEntity
}
public TEntity[] GetEntities<TEntity>(QueryTreeNode queryRoot)
{
return GetAllEntities<TEntity>()
.Where(BuildExpression<TEntity>(queryRoot));
}
Expression<Func<TEntity, bool>> BuildExpression<TEntity>(QueryTreeNode queryRoot)
{
// Expression building logic
}
}
然后你从控制器调用它:
using static WebApplication1.Models.QueryTreeHelper;
public class FilterController
{
[HttpGet]
[ReadRoute("")]
public Entity[] GetList(QueryTreeNode queryRoot, string entityType)
{
var type = Assembly.GetExecutingAssembly().GetType(entityType);
var entities = someRepository.GetType()
.GetMethod("GetEntities")
.MakeGenericMethod(type)
.Invoke(dbContext, queryRoot);
}
// A sample tree to test the view
[HttpGet]
public ActionResult Sample()
{
return View(
Branch(
Branch(
Leaf("a", 1),
Branch(
Leaf("d", 4),
Leaf("b", 2))),
Leaf("c", 3)));
}
}
<强>更新强>
正如评论中所讨论的,最好有一个模型类:
public class QueryTreeNode
{
// Branch data (should be null for leaf)
public QueryTreeNode LeftBranch { get; set; }
public QueryTreeNode RightBranch { get; set; }
// Leaf data (should be null for branch)
public string PropertyName { get; set; }
public string Value { get; set; }
}
...和一个编辑器模板:
@model WebApplication1.Models.QueryTreeNode
<div style="margin-left: 15px">
@{
if (Model.PropertyName == null)
{
<h4>Branch</h4>
<div style="border-left-style: dotted">
<div>@Html.EditorFor(x => x.LeftBranch)</div>
<div>@Html.EditorFor(x => x.RightBranch)</div>
</div>
}
else
{
<div>
<div>@Html.LabelFor(x => x.PropertyName)</div>
<div>@Html.EditorFor(x => x.PropertyName)</div>
<div>@Html.LabelFor(x => x.Value)</div>
<div>@Html.EditorFor(x => x.Value)</div>
</div>
}
}
</div>
这种方式再次需要大量验证。
答案 1 :(得分:0)
答案 2 :(得分:0)
我创建了一个可以使用标准ComplexTypeModelBinder
的界面活页夹//Redefine IModelBinder so that when the ModelBinderProvider Casts it to an
//IModelBinder it uses our new BindModelAsync
public class InterfaceBinder : ComplexTypeModelBinder, IModelBinder
{
protected TypeResolverOptions _options;
//protected Dictionary<Type, ModelMetadata> _modelMetadataMap;
protected IDictionary<ModelMetadata, IModelBinder> _propertyMap;
protected ModelBinderProviderContext _binderProviderContext;
protected InterfaceBinder(TypeResolverOptions options, ModelBinderProviderContext binderProviderContext, IDictionary<ModelMetadata, IModelBinder> propertyMap) : base(propertyMap)
{
this._options = options;
//this._modelMetadataMap = modelMetadataMap;
this._propertyMap = propertyMap;
this._binderProviderContext = binderProviderContext;
}
public InterfaceBinder(TypeResolverOptions options, ModelBinderProviderContext binderProviderContext) :
this(options, binderProviderContext, new Dictionary<ModelMetadata, IModelBinder>())
{
}
public new Task BindModelAsync(ModelBindingContext bindingContext)
{
var propertyNames = bindingContext.HttpContext.Request.Query
.Select(x => x.Key.Trim());
var modelName = bindingContext.ModelName;
if (false == string.IsNullOrEmpty(modelName))
{
modelName = modelName + ".";
propertyNames = propertyNames
.Where(x => x.StartsWith(modelName, StringComparison.OrdinalIgnoreCase))
.Select(x => x.Remove(0, modelName.Length));
}
//split always returns original object if empty
propertyNames = propertyNames.Select(p => p.Split('.')[0]);
var type = ResolveTypeFromCommonProperties(propertyNames, bindingContext.ModelType);
ModelBindingResult result;
ModelStateDictionary modelState;
object model;
using (var scope = CreateNestedBindingScope(bindingContext, type))
{
base.BindModelAsync(bindingContext);
result = bindingContext.Result;
modelState = bindingContext.ModelState;
model = bindingContext.Model;
}
bindingContext.ModelState = modelState;
bindingContext.Result = result;
bindingContext.Model = model;
return Task.FromResult(0);
}
protected override object CreateModel(ModelBindingContext bindingContext)
{
return Activator.CreateInstance(bindingContext.ModelType);
}
protected NestedScope CreateNestedBindingScope(ModelBindingContext bindingContext, Type type)
{
var modelMetadata = this._binderProviderContext.MetadataProvider.GetMetadataForType(type);
//TODO: don't create this everytime this should be cached
this._propertyMap.Clear();
for (var i = 0; i < modelMetadata.Properties.Count; i++)
{
var property = modelMetadata.Properties[i];
var binder = this._binderProviderContext.CreateBinder(property);
this._propertyMap.Add(property, binder);
}
return bindingContext.EnterNestedScope(modelMetadata, bindingContext.ModelName, bindingContext.ModelName, null);
}
protected Type ResolveTypeFromCommonProperties(IEnumerable<string> propertyNames, Type interfaceType)
{
var types = this.ConcreteTypesFromInterface(interfaceType);
//Find the type with the most matching properties, with the least unassigned properties
var expectedType = types.OrderByDescending(x => x.GetProperties().Select(p => p.Name).Intersect(propertyNames).Count())
.ThenBy(x => x.GetProperties().Length).FirstOrDefault();
expectedType = interfaceType.CopyGenericParameters(expectedType);
if (null == expectedType)
{
throw new Exception("No suitable type found for models");
}
return expectedType;
}
public List<Type> ConcreteTypesFromInterface(Type interfaceType)
{
var interfaceTypeInfo = interfaceType.GetTypeInfo();
if (interfaceTypeInfo.IsGenericType && (false == interfaceTypeInfo.IsGenericTypeDefinition))
{
interfaceType = interfaceTypeInfo.GetGenericTypeDefinition();
}
this._options.TypeResolverMap.TryGetValue(interfaceType, out var types);
return types ?? new List<Type>();
}
}
然后你需要一个模型绑定提供者:
public class InterfaceBinderProvider : IModelBinderProvider
{
TypeResolverOptions _options;
public InterfaceBinderProvider(TypeResolverOptions options)
{
this._options = options;
}
public IModelBinder GetBinder(ModelBinderProviderContext context)
{
if (!context.Metadata.IsCollectionType &&
(context.Metadata.ModelType.GetTypeInfo().IsInterface ||
context.Metadata.ModelType.GetTypeInfo().IsAbstract) &&
(context.BindingInfo.BindingSource == null ||
!context.BindingInfo.BindingSource
.CanAcceptDataFrom(BindingSource.Services)))
{
return new InterfaceBinder(this._options, context);
}
return null;
}
}
然后将粘合剂注入您的服务:
var interfaceBinderOptions = new TypeResolverOptions();
interfaceBinderOptions.TypeResolverMap.Add(typeof(IFilterResolver<>),
new List<Type> { typeof(QueryTreeNode<>), typeof(QueryTreeBranch<>) });
var interfaceProvider = new InterfaceBinderProvider(interfaceBinderOptions);
services.AddSingleton(typeof(TypeResolverOptions), interfaceBinderOptions);
services.AddMvc(config => {
config.ModelBinderProviders.Insert(0, interfaceProvider);
});
然后你的控制器设置如此
public MessageDTO Get(IFilterResolver<Message> foo)
{
//now you can resolve expression etc...
}