C#委托与params

时间:2017-09-04 08:46:06

标签: c# delegates action

我有一个调用其他工具的验证方法:

public ValidationResult Validate(Some arg) {
    var errors = new List<ValidationError>();

    validate1(arg, errors);
    if (errors.Count > 0) {
        return ValidationResult.Failed(errors);
    }

    validate2(arg, other, errors);
    if (errors.Count > 0) {
        return ValidationResult.Failed(errors);
    }

    validate3(arg, other2, errors);
    if (errors.Count > 0) {
        return ValidationResult.Failed(errors);
    }

    return ValidationResult.Succeess();
}

我想要一些方法来制作如下代码,使用for循环来调用每个验证器:

public ValidationResult Validate(Some arg) {
    var errors = new List<ValidationError>();

    var validators = new [] {
        validate1(arg, errors),
        validate2(arg, other, errors),
        validate3(arg, other2, errors)
    };

    foreach (var validator in validators) {
        validator.invoke();
        if (errors.Count > 0) {
            return ValidationResult.Failed(errors);
        }
    }

    return ValidationResult.Success();
}

我该怎么做?

4 个答案:

答案 0 :(得分:7)

你可以试试这个

var validators = new Action[]  {
    ()=>validate1(arg, errors),
    ()=>validate2(arg, other, errors),
    ()=>validate3(arg, other2, errors)
};

foreach (var v in  validators)
    v();

答案 1 :(得分:1)

您可以为验证器定义一个公共接口,并为每个用例实现一个类。

public interface IValidator {
    ValidationResult Invoke();
}

public class Validator1 : IValidator {
    private string _arg;
    private List<ValidationError> _errors;

    Validator1(string arg, List<ValidationError> errors) {
        _arg = arg; 
       _errors = errors
    }

    public ValidationResult Validate() {
        if (_errors.Count > 0) {
            return ValidationResult.Failed(_errors);
        }
        return ValidationResult.Success();
    }
}

然后您可以使用IValidator实例列表。

public ValidationResult Validate(Some arg) {
    var errors = new List<ValidationError>();

    var validators = new IValidator[] {
        new Validator1(arg, errors),
        new Validator2(arg, other, errors),
        new Validator3(arg, other2, errors)
    };

    foreach (var validator in validators) {
        var result = validator.Invoke();
        if (result != ValidationResult.Success()) {
            return result;
        }
    }

    return ValidationResult.Success();
}

答案 2 :(得分:0)

好吧,我考虑以类似Fluent的方式实现验证:

public interface IValidator<T>
{
    IEnumerable<ValidationError> Validate(T obj);
    IEnumerable<ValidationError> ValidateAll(IEnumerable<T> obj);
}


public class SomeTypeValidator : IValidator<SomeType>
{
    private readonly IValidator<SomeNestedType> _validator1;
    public SomeTypeValidator(IValidator<SomeNestedType> validator1)
    {
        _validator1 = validator1;
    }

    public IEnumerable<ValidationError> Validate(SomeType obj)
    {
        yield return Error("My first error");
        foreach(var e in _validator1.Validate(obj.val1))
        {
             yield return e;
        }
        /*whatever you desire goes here*/
    }

    public IEnumerable<ValidationError> ValidateAll(IEnumerable<SomeType> objs)
    {
        return objs.SelectMany(Validate);
    }
}

然后是一些有用的扩展:

public static void ThrowIfInvalid(this IEnumerable<ValidationError> errors)
{
    if(errors == null)
       return;
    var e = errors.ToList();
    if(e.Any())
    {
        throw new Exception(\*use 'e' here to form exception*\);
    }
}

然后在代码的某个地方我称之为:

_validator.Validate(new SomeType()).ThrowIfInvalid();

通过这种方式,您可以将自己从这些错误列表/包中解脱出来,并将验证错误流重定向到您想要的任何其他验证器。此外,您始终可以通过调用yield break来停止验证,并且可以从中创建ansamble。

答案 3 :(得分:0)

谢谢@ tym32167!

我还有一些关于异步的补充:

        var validations = new Func<Task>[]
        {
            async () => await ValidateAsync(arg, other, errors)
        };

        foreach (var validation in validations)
        {
            await validation();
            if (errors.Count > 0)
            {
                return ValidationResult.Failed(errors);
            }
        }