我试图用泛型类型实现策略模式。我尝试创建对象,结束调用它,但我不知道应该如何看起来像它的签名。我的问题出在ObjectProcessor类(Do方法)。
//my code
abstract class Credential {}
class SNMP : Credential { }
class HTTP : Credential { }
//dll
abstract class CredentialDLL { }
class SNMPDLL : CredentialDLL { }
class HTTPDLL : CredentialDLL { }
interface IMapper<T, Y>
{
T Map(Y input);
Y Map(T input);
}
class SNMPMapper : IMapper<SNMP, SNMPDLL>
{
public SNMPDLL Map(SNMP input) { throw new NotImplementedException(); }
public SNMP Map(SNMPDLL input) { throw new NotImplementedException(); }
}
class HTPPMapper : IMapper<HTTP, HTTPDLL>
{
public HTTPDLL Map(HTTP input) { throw new NotImplementedException(); }
public HTTP Map(HTTPDLL input) { throw new NotImplementedException(); }
}
class ObjectProcessor
{
CredentialDLL Do(Credential input)
{
IMapper <?,?> mapper; // ??
if (input is SNMP)
{
mapper = new SNMPMapper();
}
else
{
mapper = new HTPPMapper();
}
return mapper.Map(input);
}
}
答案 0 :(得分:2)
The simple answer is, you can't declare the mapper outside of the if statement because each of those two types returns a different mapper (one is <script src="/lib/js/vendor.min.js"></script>
and the other is <script src="/com/app.js" defer></script>
). There are several options to solving this, but without knowing the rest of your code it is hard to say what would be the best option. The simplest change that I can think of would be to edit your //Make program fullscreen, etc
axShockwaveFlash1.Dock = DockStyle.Fill;
InitFlashMovie(axShockwaveFlash1,Properties.Resources.SWF);
method like this:
IMapper<SNMP, SNMPDLL>
A second possiblity would be to add a IMapper<HTTP, HTTPDLL>
method to your abstract class and then implement it in each derived class. Then you could simplify the Do
method further and remove the need to check for a type (which seems to defeat the purpose of having a generic or a base class anyway).
CredentialDLL Do(Credential input)
{
if (input is SNMP)
{
return new SNMPMapper().Map(input);
}
else
{
return new HTPPMapper().Map(input);
}
}