我想用Boost.Spirit x3解析一个递归语法,但它失败了,模板实例化深度问题。
语法如下:
value: int | float | char | tuple
int: "int: " int_
float: "float: " real_
char: "char: " char_
tuple: "tuple: [" value* "]"
这是一个包含的例子:
#include <boost/fusion/adapted.hpp>
#include <boost/spirit/home/x3.hpp>
#include <string>
#include <vector>
#include <variant>
struct value: std::variant<int,float,std::vector<value>>
{
using std::variant<int,float,std::vector<value>>::variant;
value& operator=(float) { return *this; }
value& operator=(int) { return *this; }
value& operator=(std::vector<value>) { return *this; }
};
using namespace boost::fusion;
namespace x3 = boost::spirit::x3;
using x3::skip;
using x3::int_;
using x3::real_parser;
using x3::char_;
x3::rule<class value_, value> const value_ = "value";
x3::rule<class o_tuple_, std::vector<value>> o_tuple_ = "tuple";
using float_p = real_parser<float, x3::strict_real_policies<float>>;
const auto o_tuple__def = "tuple: " >> skip(boost::spirit::x3::space)["[" >> value_ % "," >> "]"];
BOOST_SPIRIT_DEFINE(o_tuple_)
const auto value__def
= ("float: " >> float_p())
| ("int: " >> int_)
| o_tuple_
;
BOOST_SPIRIT_DEFINE(value_)
int main()
{
std::string str;
value val;
using boost::spirit::x3::parse;
auto first = str.cbegin(), last = str.cend();
bool r = parse(first, last, value_, val);
}
如果注释了行| o_tuple_
(例如没有递归),则此方法有效。
答案 0 :(得分:1)
这是X3中递归的常见问题。它尚未解决。
我想我理解这个问题是因为x3::skip
改变了上下文对象¹。确实,删除它会使事情编译,并成功解析一些琐碎的测试用例:
"float: 3.14",
"int: 3.14",
"tuple: [float: 3.14,int: 3]",
但是,如果没有船长,显然以下内容不会解析:
// the following _should_ have compiled with the original skip() configuration:
"tuple: [ float: 3.14,\tint: 3 ]",
现在,我敢说你可以通过在顶层应用队长来解决问题(这意味着上下文对于实例化“循环”中涉及的所有规则是相同的)。如果这样做,您将立即开始接受输入中更灵活的空格:
// the following would not have parsed with the original skip() configuration:
"float:3.14",
"int:3.14",
"tuple:[float: 3.14,int: 3]",
"tuple:[float:3.14,int:3]",
"tuple: [ float:3.14,\tint:3 ]",
即使已经成功编译,这些都不会用原始方法解析。
以下是我对代码进行的一些调整。
删除了无效的赋值运算符value::operator=
(我不知道你为什么会这样做)
添加代码以打印任何value
的调试转储:
friend std::ostream& operator<<(std::ostream& os, base_type const& v) {
struct {
std::ostream& operator()(float const& f) const { return _os << "float:" << f; }
std::ostream& operator()(int const& i) const { return _os << "int:" << i; }
std::ostream& operator()(std::vector<value> const& v) const {
_os << "tuple: [";
for (auto& el : v) _os << el << ",";
return _os << ']';
}
std::ostream& _os;
} vis { os };
return std::visit(vis, v);
}
删除队长并从:
interpunction中分离出关键字:
namespace x3 = boost::spirit::x3;
x3::rule<struct value_class, value> const value_ = "value";
x3::rule<struct o_tuple_class, std::vector<value> > o_tuple_ = "tuple";
x3::real_parser<float, x3::strict_real_policies<float> > float_;
const auto o_tuple__def = "tuple" >> x3::lit(':') >> ("[" >> value_ % "," >> "]");
const auto value__def
= "float" >> (':' >> float_)
| "int" >> (':' >> x3::int_)
| o_tuple_
;
BOOST_SPIRIT_DEFINE(value_, o_tuple_)
现在,关键步骤:在toplevel添加队长:
const auto entry_point = x3::skip(x3::space) [ value_ ];
创建好的测试驱动程序main()
:
int main()
{
for (std::string const str : {
"",
"float: 3.14",
"int: 3.14",
"tuple: [float: 3.14,int: 3]",
// the following _should_ have compiled with the original skip() configuration:
"tuple: [ float: 3.14,\tint: 3 ]",
// the following would not have parsed with the original skip() configuration:
"float:3.14",
"int:3.14",
"tuple:[float: 3.14,int: 3]",
"tuple:[float:3.14,int:3]",
"tuple: [ float:3.14,\tint:3 ]",
// one final show case for good measure
R"(
tuple: [
int : 4,
float: 7e9,
tuple: [float: -inf],
int: 42
])"
}) {
std::cout << "============ '" << str << "'\n";
//using boost::spirit::x3::parse;
auto first = str.begin(), last = str.end();
value val;
if (parse(first, last, parser::entry_point, val))
std::cout << "Parsed '" << val << "'\n";
else
std::cout << "Parse failed\n";
if (first != last)
std::cout << "Remaining input: '" << std::string(first, last) << "'\n";
}
}
//#define BOOST_SPIRIT_X3_DEBUG
#include <iostream>
#include <boost/fusion/adapted.hpp>
#include <boost/spirit/home/x3.hpp>
#include <string>
#include <vector>
#include <variant>
struct value: std::variant<int,float,std::vector<value>>
{
using base_type = std::variant<int,float,std::vector<value>>;
using base_type::variant;
friend std::ostream& operator<<(std::ostream& os, base_type const& v) {
struct {
std::ostream& operator()(float const& f) const { return _os << "float:" << f; }
std::ostream& operator()(int const& i) const { return _os << "int:" << i; }
std::ostream& operator()(std::vector<value> const& v) const {
_os << "tuple: [";
for (auto& el : v) _os << el << ",";
return _os << ']';
}
std::ostream& _os;
} vis { os };
return std::visit(vis, v);
}
};
namespace parser {
namespace x3 = boost::spirit::x3;
x3::rule<struct value_class, value> const value_ = "value";
x3::rule<struct o_tuple_class, std::vector<value> > o_tuple_ = "tuple";
x3::real_parser<float, x3::strict_real_policies<float> > float_;
const auto o_tuple__def = "tuple" >> x3::lit(':') >> ("[" >> value_ % "," >> "]");
const auto value__def
= "float" >> (':' >> float_)
| "int" >> (':' >> x3::int_)
| o_tuple_
;
BOOST_SPIRIT_DEFINE(value_, o_tuple_)
const auto entry_point = x3::skip(x3::space) [ value_ ];
}
int main()
{
for (std::string const str : {
"",
"float: 3.14",
"int: 3.14",
"tuple: [float: 3.14,int: 3]",
// the following _should_ have compiled with the original skip() configuration:
"tuple: [ float: 3.14,\tint: 3 ]",
// the following would not have parsed with the original skip() configuration:
"float:3.14",
"int:3.14",
"tuple:[float: 3.14,int: 3]",
"tuple:[float:3.14,int:3]",
"tuple: [ float:3.14,\tint:3 ]",
// one final show case for good measure
R"(
tuple: [
int : 4,
float: 7e9,
tuple: [float: -inf],
int: 42
])"
}) {
std::cout << "============ '" << str << "'\n";
//using boost::spirit::x3::parse;
auto first = str.begin(), last = str.end();
value val;
if (parse(first, last, parser::entry_point, val))
std::cout << "Parsed '" << val << "'\n";
else
std::cout << "Parse failed\n";
if (first != last)
std::cout << "Remaining input: '" << std::string(first, last) << "'\n";
}
}
打印
============ ''
Parse failed
============ 'float: 3.14'
Parsed 'float:3.14'
============ 'int: 3.14'
Parsed 'int:3'
Remaining input: '.14'
============ 'tuple: [float: 3.14,int: 3]'
Parsed 'tuple: [float:3.14,int:3,]'
============ 'tuple: [ float: 3.14, int: 3 ]'
Parsed 'tuple: [float:3.14,int:3,]'
============ 'float:3.14'
Parsed 'float:3.14'
============ 'int:3.14'
Parsed 'int:3'
Remaining input: '.14'
============ 'tuple:[float: 3.14,int: 3]'
Parsed 'tuple: [float:3.14,int:3,]'
============ 'tuple:[float:3.14,int:3]'
Parsed 'tuple: [float:3.14,int:3,]'
============ 'tuple: [ float:3.14, int:3 ]'
Parsed 'tuple: [float:3.14,int:3,]'
============ '
tuple: [
int : 4,
float: 7e9,
tuple: [float: -inf],
int: 42
]'
Parsed 'tuple: [int:4,float:7e+09,tuple: [float:-inf,],int:42,]'
¹其他指令也是如此,例如x3::with<>
。问题是上下文在每个实例化级别上获得扩展,而不是“修改”以获得原始上下文类型,并结束实例化循环。