我有一个像MongoDB这样的文档:
Exsample:
"_id" : "55689be772ba931a30c87fd8",
"Draft" : false,
"Deleted" : false,
"productsId" : [
ObjectId("55688d7a72ba931bf430edf5"),
ObjectId("55688d7a72ba931bf430edf8"),
ObjectId("55688d7a72ba931bf430edf0"),
ObjectId("55688d7a72ba931bf430edee")
]
我有一个索引:
db.getCollection("mycolection").createIndex({ "Deleted": 1, "Draft": 1, "productsId": 1 }, { "name": "_deleted_draft_productsId" })
为什么我执行此查询时:
db.mycolection.explain("executionStats").count({productsId: ObjectId('55688d7a72ba931bf430edf4'),Draft: { $ne: true }, Deleted: { $ne: true } })
我通过totalKeysExamined:687
收到此统计信息:
"executionStats" : {
"executionSuccess" : true,
"nReturned" : 685,
"executionTimeMillis" : 3,
"totalKeysExamined" : 687,
"totalDocsExamined" : 685,
"executionStages" : {
"stage" : "FETCH",
"filter" : {
"$and" : [
{
"$nor" : [
{
"Deleted" : {
"$eq" : true
}
}
]
},
{
"$nor" : [
{
"Draft" : {
"$eq" : true
}
}
]
}
]
},
"nReturned" : 685,
"executionTimeMillisEstimate" : 0,
"works" : 687,
"advanced" : 685,
"needTime" : 1,
"needYield" : 0,
"saveState" : 7,
"restoreState" : 7,
"isEOF" : 1,
"invalidates" : 0,
"docsExamined" : 685,
"alreadyHasObj" : 0,
"inputStage" : {
"stage" : "IXSCAN",
"nReturned" : 685,
"executionTimeMillisEstimate" : 0,
"works" : 687,
"advanced" : 685,
"needTime" : 1,
"needYield" : 0,
"saveState" : 7,
"restoreState" : 7,
"isEOF" : 1,
"invalidates" : 0,
"keyPattern" : {
"productsId" : 1,
"Deleted" : 1,
"Draft" : 1
},
"indexName" : "_productsId_deleted_draft",
"isMultiKey" : true,
"multiKeyPaths" : {
"productsId" : [
"productsId"
],
"Deleted" : [ ],
"Draft" : [ ]
},
"isUnique" : false,
"isSparse" : false,
"isPartial" : false,
"indexVersion" : 2,
"direction" : "forward",
"indexBounds" : {
"productsId" : [
"[ObjectId('55688d7a72ba931bf430edf4'), ObjectId('55688d7a72ba931bf430edf4')]"
],
"Deleted" : [
"[MinKey, true)",
"(true, MaxKey]"
],
"Draft" : [
"[MinKey, true)",
"(true, MaxKey]"
]
},
"keysExamined" : 687,
"seeks" : 2,
"dupsTested" : 685,
"dupsDropped" : 0,
"seenInvalidated" : 0
}
}
}
但如果我尝试以这种方式删除draft
和deleted
bool字段:
db.Redazionale.explain("executionStats").count({IdProdotti: ObjectId('55688d7a72ba931bf430edf4') })
我使用totalDocsExamined:0
获得此统计信息,这也是我在之前的查询中所期望的
"executionStats" : {
"executionSuccess" : true,
"nReturned" : 0,
"executionTimeMillis" : 0,
"totalKeysExamined" : 690,
"totalDocsExamined" : 0,
"executionStages" : {
"stage" : "COUNT",
"nReturned" : 0,
"executionTimeMillisEstimate" : 0,
"works" : 690,
"advanced" : 0,
"needTime" : 689,
"needYield" : 0,
"saveState" : 5,
"restoreState" : 5,
"isEOF" : 1,
"invalidates" : 0,
"nCounted" : 689,
"nSkipped" : 0,
"inputStage" : {
"stage" : "COUNT_SCAN",
"nReturned" : 689,
"executionTimeMillisEstimate" : 0,
"works" : 690,
"advanced" : 689,
"needTime" : 0,
"needYield" : 0,
"saveState" : 5,
"restoreState" : 5,
"isEOF" : 1,
"invalidates" : 0,
"keysExamined" : 690,
"keyPattern" : {
"productsId" : 1,
"Deleted" : 1,
"Draft" : 1
},
"indexName" : "_productsId_deleted_draft",
"isMultiKey" : true,
"multiKeyPaths" : {
"productsId" : [
"productsId"
],
"Deleted" : [ ],
"Draft" : [ ]
},
"isUnique" : false,
"isSparse" : false,
"isPartial" : false,
"indexVersion" : 2,
"indexBounds" : {
"startKey" : {
"productsId" : ObjectId("55688d7a72ba931bf430edf4"),
"Deleted" : MinKey,
"Draft" : MinKey
},
"startKeyInclusive" : true,
"endKey" : {
"productsId" : ObjectId("55688d7a72ba931bf430edf4"),
"Deleted" : MaxKey,
"Draft" : MaxKey
},
"endKeyInclusive" : true
}
}
}
}
我上传了一个文件转储来创建整个数据库的一小部分。 click here to download
并尝试这些查询:
db.Redazionale.explain("executionStats").count({ IdProdotti: ObjectId('55688d7a72ba931bf430edf4'),Draft: { $ne: true }, Deleted: { $ne: true } })
db.Redazionale.explain("executionStats").count({ IdProdotti: ObjectId('55688d7a72ba931bf430edf4') })
答案 0 :(得分:0)
问题是像Draft: { $ne: true }
这样的查询实际上是具有以下范围的范围查询:
"Draft" : [
"[MinKey, true)",
"(true, MaxKey]"
]
所以您的查询结果有3个边界:
"indexBounds" : {
"productsId" : [
"[ObjectId('55688d7a72ba931bf430edf4'), ObjectId('55688d7a72ba931bf430edf4')]"
],
"Deleted" : [
"[MinKey, true)",
"(true, MaxKey]"
],
"Draft" : [
"[MinKey, true)",
"(true, MaxKey]"
]
},
如果您有多个选择索引,则由优化者选择最具选择性的索引。
在你的情况下,它决定productsId
是最有效的,这是一个公平的选择。它使用复合索引productsId
的{{1}}部分来获取相关文档,然后通过其他2个字段对其进行过滤。
删除3个范围中的2个允许使用COUNT_SCAN。将布尔范围转换为精确比较也是如此。像
这样的查询_productsId_deleted_draft
COUNT_SCAN是否可以使用以下边界:
db.mycolection.explain("executionStats").count({
productsId: ObjectId('55688d7a72ba931bf430edf4'),
Draft: false,
Deleted: false
})
问题是 "indexBounds" : {
"startKey" : {
"productsId" : ObjectId("55688d7a72ba931bf430edf4"),
"Deleted" : false,
"Draft" : false
},
"startKeyInclusive" : true,
"endKey" : {
"productsId" : ObjectId("55688d7a72ba931bf430edf4"),
"Deleted" : false,
"Draft" : false
},
"endKeyInclusive" : true
}
只有当所有文档都有Draft: { $ne: true }
字段时才等同于Draft: false
,因此可能是确保布尔字段始终存在的选项。甚至可以使用document validation强制执行它。这实际上取决于优化带来了多少好处。