我目前正在浏览Type-Driven Development with Idris本书。
我在第6章中有两个与示例数据存储设计有关的问题。数据存储是一个命令行应用程序,允许用户设置存储在其中的数据类型,然后添加新数据。 / p>
以下是代码的相关部分(略有简化)。您可以在Github上看到full code:
module Main
import Data.Vect
infixr 4 .+.
-- This datatype is to define what sorts of data can be contained in the data store.
data Schema
= SString
| SInt
| (.+.) Schema Schema
-- This is a type-level function that translates a Schema to an actual type.
SchemaType : Schema -> Type
SchemaType SString = String
SchemaType SInt = Int
SchemaType (x .+. y) = (SchemaType x, SchemaType y)
-- This is the data store. It can potentially be storing any sort of schema.
record DataStore where
constructor MkData
schema : Schema
size : Nat
items : Vect size (SchemaType schema)
-- This adds new data to the datastore, making sure that the new data is
-- the same type that the DataStore holds.
addToStore
: (dataStore : DataStore) -> SchemaType (schema dataStore) -> DataStore
addToStore (MkData schema' size' store') newitem =
MkData schema' _ (addToData store')
where
addToData
: Vect size' (SchemaType schema') -> Vect (size' + 1) (SchemaType schema')
addToData xs = xs ++ [newitem]
-- These are commands the user can use on the command line. They are able
-- to change the schema, and add new data.
data Command : Schema -> Type where
SetSchema : (newSchema : Schema) -> Command schema
Add : SchemaType schema -> Command schema
-- Given a Schema, this parses input from the user into a Command.
parse : (schema : Schema) -> String -> Maybe (Command schema)
-- This is the main workhorse of the application. It parses user
-- input, turns it into a command, then evaluates the command and
-- returns an updated DataStore.
processInput
: (dataStore : DataStore) -> String -> Maybe (String, DataStore)
processInput dataStore@(MkData schema' size' items') input =
case parse schema' input of
Nothing => Just ("Invalid command\n", dataStore)
Just (SetSchema newSchema) =>
Just ("updated schema and reset datastore\n", MkData newSchema _ [])
Just (Add item) =>
let newStore = addToStore (MkData schema' size' items') item
in Just ("ID " ++ show (size dataStore) ++ "\n", newStore)
-- This kicks off processInput with an empty datastore and a simple Schema
-- of SString.
main : IO ()
main = replWith (MkData SString _ []) "Command: " processInput
这很有意义且易于使用,但有一件事让我对设计产生了疑问。 为什么DataStore
包含Schema
而不是被一个索引?
由于DataStore
未被Schema
编入索引,我们可能会编写一个不正确的addToStore
函数,如下所示:
addToStore
: (dataStore : DataStore) -> SchemaType (schema dataStore) -> DataStore
addToStore _ newitem =
MkData SInt _ []
以下是我想象的更安全类型的代码。您可以在Github上看到full code:
module Main
import Data.Vect
infixr 4 .+.
data Schema
= SString
| SInt
| (.+.) Schema Schema
SchemaType : Schema -> Type
SchemaType SString = String
SchemaType SInt = Int
SchemaType (x .+. y) = (SchemaType x, SchemaType y)
record DataStore (schema : Schema) where
constructor MkData
size : Nat
items : Vect size (SchemaType schema)
addToStore
: (dataStore : DataStore schema) ->
SchemaType schema ->
DataStore schema
addToStore {schema} (MkData size' store') newitem =
MkData _ (addToData store')
where
addToData
: Vect size' (SchemaType schema) -> Vect (size' + 1) (SchemaType schema)
addToData xs = xs ++ [newitem]
data Command : Schema -> Type where
SetSchema : (newSchema : Schema) -> Command schema
Add : SchemaType schema -> Command schema
parse : (schema : Schema) -> String -> Maybe (Command schema)
processInput
: (schema : Schema ** DataStore schema) ->
String ->
Maybe (String, (newschema ** DataStore newschema))
processInput (schema ** (MkData size' items')) input =
case parse schema input of
Nothing => Just ("Invalid command\n", (_ ** MkData size' items'))
Just (SetSchema newSchema) =>
Just ("updated schema and reset datastore\n", (newSchema ** MkData _ []))
Just (Add item) =>
let newStore = addToStore (MkData size' items') item
msg = "ID " ++ show (size newStore) ++ "\n"
in Just (msg, (schema ** newStore))
main : IO ()
main = replWith (SString ** MkData _ []) "Command: " processInput
以下是我的两个问题:
为什么本书没有使用DataStore
类型的更安全版本(由Schema
索引的版本)?是否有使用较少类型安全版本(仅包含Schema
的版本)获得的内容?
被另一种类型与另一种类型进行索引的类型的理论差异是什么?这种差异会根据您正在使用的语言而改变吗?
例如,我想伊德里斯可能没有太大差异,但Haskell有很大的不同。 (右...?)
我刚刚开始玩Idris(我并不是特别熟悉在Haskell中使用单身人士或GADT),所以我很难绕过这个。如果你能指出我谈论这个的任何论文,我会非常感兴趣。
答案 0 :(得分:1)
根据评论,这是迂腐。在早期,使用依赖记录,因此不需要处理类型索引。稍后,使用索引类型来限制(并通过校对搜索更容易找到)有效的实现。