后台:我需要使用计划任务来扫描数据表(1分钟扫描一次,或者可能30秒一次),数据表会增加记录,数据表会在第三个数据源,以集合作为参数来做一件事,这件事所需的时间无法确定(一个http请求),在完成每个数据库记录的修改状态后,避免再次扫描当查询出来时。
public class ScanJob : IJob
{
//Simulation of the data table, the reality of his records will not increase.
public static List<Person> persions = new List<Person>
{
new Person() { Name = "aaa", Status = true },
new Person() { Name = "bbb", Status = true },
new Person() { Name = "ccc", Status = true },
new Person() { Name = "ddd", Status = true },
new Person() { Name = "eee", Status = true },
};
//Intermediate variable, to avoid the previous has not yet ended, the next time has begun
public static List<string> process = new List<string>();
public void Execute(IJobExecutionContext context)
{
//Equivalent to a database query
var pers = persions.Where(s => s.Status).ToList();
//Exclude the object that was executed the previous time
pers = pers.Where(s=> !process.Contains(s.Name)).ToList();
Action<List<Person>> doWork = (s) =>
{
process.AddRange(s.Select(n => n.Name));//Add to intermediate variable
DoWork(s);//Do something that can not be expected time (http request)
};
doWork.BeginInvoke(pers, (str) =>
{
//After DoWork() ends, organize the intermediate variables
if (pers != null && pers.Count() > 0)
{
foreach (var i in pers)
process.Remove(i.Name);
}
}, null);
Console.ReadKey();
}
public void DoWork(List<Person> _pers)
{
Thread.Sleep(1000 * 60 * 1 + 1000 * 10);//Simulate http requests (One minute 10 seconds)
var firstPer = persions.Where(s => s.Status).FirstOrDefault();
if (firstPer != null)
{
//Simulation to modify the table record
firstPer.Status = false;
}
}
}
由于多个作业触发器较短,并且DoWork()方法执行时间不可预测,因此可能导致多个线程同时访问persions变量。如何使用lock语句来处理这个问题?
答案 0 :(得分:0)
我对处理集合进行了三次访问,而不依赖于类
public static class BaseProcessOperator<T>
{
static List<string> prevProcess = new List<string>();
static object obj = new object();
public static void AddRange(List<string> para)
{
lock (obj)
{
prevProcess.AddRange(para);
}
}
public static List<string> GetProcesses()
{
lock (obj)
{
return prevProcess;
}
}
public static void Remove<TParam>(List<TParam> currList, Func<TParam, string> fn)
{
if (currList != null && currList.Count() > 0)
{
lock (obj)
{
foreach (var i in currList)
{
var r = prevProcess.FirstOrDefault(s => s == fn(i));
if (!string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(r))
prevProcess.Remove(r);
}
}
}
}
}
修改后的ScanJob.cs文件(不再直接使用process
集,而是通过BaseProcessOperator<T>
)
public void Execute(IJobExecutionContext context)
{
//Equivalent to a database query
var pers = persions.Where(s => s.Status).ToList();
//Exclude the object that was executed the previous time
pers = pers.Where(s => !BaseProcessOperator<ScanJob>.GetProcesses().Contains(s.Name)).ToList();
Action<List<Person>> doWork = (s) =>
{
BaseProcessOperator<ScanJob>.AddRange(s.Select(n => n.Name).ToList());//Add to intermediate variable
DoWork(s);//Do something that can not be expected time (http request)
};
doWork.BeginInvoke(pers, (str) =>
{
//After DoWork() ends, organize the intermediate variables
BaseProcessOperator<ScanJob>.Remove(pers, (s) => { return s.Name; });
}, null);
Console.ReadKey();
}
答案 1 :(得分:0)
您可以通过添加DisallowConcurrentExecution
属性
[DisallowConcurrentExecution]
public class ScanJob : IJob
{
}