需要有关此代码的帮助,它应返回c[]
,其号码为a[] % b[] = 0
,但不起作用。
#define _CRT_SECURE_NO_WARNINGS
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
int *divide(int a[], int a_size, int b[], int b_size)
{
int i = 0, j = 0, k = 0, counter = 0, *c;
c = (int*)malloc(b_size * sizeof(int));
for (i = 0; i < b_size; i++)
{
for (j = 0; j < a_size; j++)
{
if (a[j] % b[i] == 0)
counter++;
}
c[k] = counter;
k++;
counter = 0;
}
for (int t = 0; t < b_size; t++)
{
printf("%d ", c[t]);
}
printf("\n");
}
main ()
{
int *a, *b, a_size, b_size;
printf("Enter size of a:\n");
scanf ("%d", &a_size);
a = (int*)malloc(a_size * sizeof(int));
printf("\nEnter size of b:\n");
scanf("%d", &b_size);
b = (int*)malloc(b_size * sizeof(int));
printf("\nEnter elements of a:\n");
for (int i = 0; i < a_size; i++)
{
scanf("%d", &a[i]);
}
printf("\nEnter elements of b:\n");
for (int j = 0; j < b_size; j++)
{
scanf("%d", &b[j]);
}
divide(&a, a_size, &b, b_size);
}
答案 0 :(得分:0)
您的代码中存在一些错误。
你希望你的fonction * divide(...)返回一个包含a [i]%b [i]操作的新数组,但是你的函数没有返回任何东西,所以你必须返回它。在main中打印新数组似乎比在函数中打印更合乎逻辑。
当您将变量传递给函数时,请小心传递int *,而不是int **。
下面是一个有效的代码示例(如果a_size和b_size不同,你没有说明该做什么,所以我假设我们只使用最小的尺寸而不是处理后的数字):< / p>
#define _CRT_SECURE_NO_WARNINGS
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
int *divide(int a[], int a_size, int b[], int b_size)
{
int i = 0, stop, *c;
if (b_size <= a_size)
{
c = (int*)malloc(b_size * sizeof(int));
stop = b_size;
}
else
{
c = (int*)malloc(a_size * sizeof(int));
stop = a_size;
}
while (i < stop)
{
c[i] = a[i] % b[i];
i++;
}
return (c);
}
int main ()
{
int *a, *b, a_size, b_size;
int *result = NULL;
int stop;
int i = 0;
printf("Enter size of a:\n");
scanf ("%d", &a_size);
a = (int*)malloc(a_size * sizeof(int));
printf("\nEnter size of b:\n");
scanf("%d", &b_size);
b = (int*)malloc(b_size * sizeof(int));
printf("\nEnter elements of a:\n");
for (int i = 0; i < a_size; i++)
{
scanf("%d", &a[i]);
}
printf("\nEnter elements of b:\n");
for (int j = 0; j < b_size; j++)
{
scanf("%d", &b[j]);
}
result = divide(a, a_size, b, b_size); //not &a neither &b because it would be a char** instead of a char*
if (a_size < b_size)
stop = a_size;
else
stop = b_size;
while (i < stop)
{
printf("%d ", result[i]);
i++;
}
return 0;
}