我在下面使用此代码循环显示合同列表,并获取每份合约的费率列表。然后它将结果存储在Dictionary中。
/// <summary>
/// Get the Rates for the Job keyed to the id of the Organisation
/// </summary>
async Task<Dictionary<int, IReadOnlyList<Rate>>> GetRatesAsync(int jobId)
{
var jobContracts = await _contractClient.GetJobContractsByJobAsync(jobId);
var result = new Dictionary<int, IReadOnlyList<Rate>>();
foreach (var jobContract in jobContracts)
{
result.Add(jobContract.Contract.Organisation.Id, await _contractClient.GetContractRatesByContractAsync(jobContract.Contract.Id));
}
return result;
}
Resharper帮我建议“循环可以转换成LINQ表达式”。但是,Resharper(下面)自动生成的修复程序无法编译。
return jobContracts.ToDictionary(jobContract => jobContract.Contract.Organisation.Id, jobContract => await _contractClient.GetContractRatesByContractAsync(jobContract.Contract.Id));
错误为The await operator can only be used within an async lamba expression
。因此,将async放入并将其更改为以下内容:
return jobContracts.ToDictionary(jobContract => jobContract.Contract.Organisation.Id, async jobContract => await _contractClient.GetContractRatesByContractAsync(jobContract.Contract.Id));
错误现在是Cannot implicitly convert type 'System.Collections.Generic.Dictionary<int, System.Threading.Tasks.Task<System.Collections.Generic.IReadOnlyList<Rate>>>' to 'System.Collections.Generic.Dictionary<int, System.Collections.Generic.IReadOnlyList<Rate>>'
,它要我将签名更改为:
async Task<Dictionary<int, Task<IReadOnlyList<Rate>>>> GetContractRatesAsync()
现在编译的最后一个更改,但我所有的调用方法都期望等待Dictionary<int, IReadOnlyList<Rate>>
的任务,而不是Dictionary<int, Task<IReadOnlyList<Rate>>
。
是否有某种方法可以将其转换为Dictionary<int, IReadOnlyList<Rate>>
?或者以其他方式异步获取数据?
答案 0 :(得分:2)
实际上,通用方法可能非常有趣,所以我会发布一个解决方案。如果您愿意,您的初始实施可能会遇到性能问题,并且您的应用程序域允许它。
如果要异步向项目添加项目,则可能需要允许这些异步项目并行运行。您希望从一个接受可枚举键和值的方法开始。值应该是生成任务而不是任务的函数。这样您就不会立即运行所有任务。
然后使用信号量控制同时启动的任务数。当您对同时开始的所有任务感到满意时,下面还有一个后备功能。
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
using System.Threading;
using System.Threading.Tasks;
namespace _43909210
{
public static class EnumerableExtensions
{
private static async Task<Dictionary<TKey, TValue>> ToDictionary<TKey,TValue>
(this IEnumerable<(TKey key, Func<Task<TValue>> valueTask)> source)
{
var results = await Task.WhenAll
( source.Select( async e => ( key: e.key, value:await e.valueTask() ) ) );
return results.ToDictionary(v=>v.key, v=>v.value);
}
public class ActionDisposable : IDisposable
{
private readonly Action _Action;
public ActionDisposable(Action action) => _Action = action;
public void Dispose() => _Action();
}
public static async Task<IDisposable> Enter(this SemaphoreSlim s)
{
await s.WaitAsync();
return new ActionDisposable( () => s.Release() );
}
/// <summary>
/// Generate a dictionary asynchronously with up to 'n' tasks running in parallel.
/// If n = 0 then there is no limit set and all tasks are started together.
/// </summary>
/// <returns></returns>
public static async Task<Dictionary<TKey, TValue>> ToDictionaryParallel<TKey,TValue>
( this IEnumerable<(TKey key, Func<Task<TValue>> valueTaskFactory)> source
, int n = 0
)
{
// Delegate to the non limiting case where
if (n <= 0)
return await ToDictionary( source );
// Set up the parallel limiting semaphore
using (var pLimit = new SemaphoreSlim( n ))
{
var dict = new Dictionary<TKey, TValue>();
// Local function to start the task and
// block (asynchronously ) when too many
// tasks are running
async Task
Run((TKey key, Func<Task<TValue>> valueTask) o)
{
// async block if the parallel limit is reached
using (await pLimit.Enter())
{
dict.Add(o.key, await o.valueTask());
}
}
// Proceed to start the tasks
foreach (var task in source.Select( Run ))
await task;
// Wait for all tasks to finish
await pLimit.WaitAsync();
return dict;
}
}
}
}