Question

总结我的模型：

许可证和证书是资格的子女
资格认证只有一个职业
专业是许可类型（类型1）或认证类型（类型2）

要求：表示业务实体之间的关系，而不会在数据库架构中引入冗余。资格类型（许可证/证书）必须与职业类型相匹配。

这是我目前的简化模型 - 我解释了为什么这不起作用：

Public Class Profession
    <Key()>
    <DataMember(Order:=0)>
    Public Property Type As Integer
    <Key()>
    <DataMember(Order:=1)>
    Public Property Code As String

    Public Property Title As String
End Class

Public Class Qualification
    Public Property Id As Integer
    Public Property PersonId As Integer
    Public Property Type As Integer
    Public Property ProfessionCode As String
    Public Overridable Property Person As Person
    Public Overridable Property Profession As Profession
End Class

Public Class License
    Inherits Qualification

    Public Property Number As String        
End Class

Public Class Certificate
    Inherits Qualification

    Public Property IssuerName As String    
End Class

这是简化的模型构建器：

modelBuilder.Entity(Of Qualification) _
    .Property(Function(q) q.ProfessionCode).IsRequired()

modelBuilder.Entity(Of Qualification) _
    .HasRequired(Of Profession)(Function(q) q.Profession) _
    .HasConstraint(Function(q, p) p.Type = q.Type AndAlso p.Code = q.ProfessionCode)

modelBuilder.Entity(Of Qualification) _
    .MapHierarchy() _
    .Case(Of Qualification)(Function(q) New With {
        q.Id,
        q.PersonId,
        q.ProfessionCode,
        .Type = 0) _
    .Case(Of License)(Function(q) New With {
        q.Number,
        .Type = 1}) _
    .Case(Of Certificate)(Function(q) New With {
        q.IssuerName,
        .Type = 2}) _
    .ToTable("dbo.Qualifications")

这不起作用的原因是EF4 does not allow FK属性要加倍作为TPH鉴别器。这意味着Type不能同时是鉴别器和外键字段。尝试在每个实体的HasConstraint方法中对专业类型进行硬编码也不起作用 - 这会产生异常。

可能的解决方案是向Profession添加代理键，在Qualification中删除Type属性并将其替换为ProfessionId FK。这将消除冗余问题，但也会破坏TPH。实际上，鉴别者从资格化转向职业。这里的问题是我还没有想出一种映射许可证和证书对象的方法。也许我可以映射到视图而不是？但是我如何在Code First中做到这一点？

所以，现在我面临着许多令人讨厌的选择。有什么建议吗？

Answer 1

我设法通过将其更改为此模型来实现：

public class Profession {    
    [Key][DataMember(Order = 0)]    
    public int Type { get; set; }
    [Key][DataMember(Order = 1)]
    public string Code { get; set; }
    public string Title { get; set; }
}

public class Qualification {
    public int Id { get; set; }               
    [Required]
    public int ProfessionType { get; set; }
    [Required]
    public string ProfessionCode { get; set; }                
    [Required]
    public virtual Profession Profession { get; set; }
}

public class License : Qualification {
    public string Number { get; set; }  
}

public class Certificate : Qualification {
    public string IssuerName { get; set; }
}

class Context : DbContext {
    public DbSet<Qualification> Qualifications { get; set; }
    public DbSet<Profession> Professions { get; set; }

    protected override void OnModelCreating(ModelBuilder modelBuilder) {
        modelBuilder.Entity<Qualification>()
            .HasRequired<Profession>(q => q.Profession)
            .HasConstraint((q, p) => q.ProfessionCode == p.Code 
                                     && q.ProfessionType == p.Type);

        modelBuilder.Entity<Qualification>().MapHierarchy()
            .Case<Qualification>(q => new {
                q.ProfessionCode,
                q.ProfessionType,
                q.Id,                    
                Type = 0
            }).Case<License>(q => new {
                q.Number,
                Type = 1
            }).Case<Certificate>(q => new {
                q.IssuerName,
                Type = 2
            }).ToTable("Qualifications");
    }
}

然而，正如您所知，QualionType在Qualification上是多余的，并且没有办法解决它，因为就像你说的那样，EF不会让你重用一个鉴别器作为一个有意义的FK，因为这个规则：

专业是许可类型（类型1）或认证类型（类型2）

是EF不知道的东西，因此它必须阻止它以保护层次结构。

就个人而言，我会按如下方式设计对象模型，我认为该模型更清晰，更少冗余：

public class Profession {
    public int ProfessionId { get; set; }        
    public int Type { get; set; }
    public string Code { get; set; }
    public string Title { get; set; }
}

public class Qualification {
    public int Id { get; set; }
    public int ProfessionId { get; set; }                
    [Required]
    public virtual Profession Profession { get; set; }
}

public class License : Qualification {
    public string Number { get; set; }  
}

public class Certificate : Qualification {
    public string IssuerName { get; set; }
}

class Context : DbContext {
    public DbSet<Qualification> Qualifications { get; set; }
    public DbSet<Profession> Professions { get; set; }

    protected override void OnModelCreating(ModelBuilder modelBuilder) {
        modelBuilder.Entity<Qualification>()
            .HasRequired<Profession>(q => q.Profession)
            .HasConstraint((q, p) => q.ProfessionId == p.ProfessionId);

        modelBuilder.Entity<Qualification>().MapHierarchy()
            .Case<Qualification>(q => new {
                q.ProfessionId,                   
                q.Id,                    
                Type = 0
            })
            .Case<License>(q => new {
                q.Number,
                Type = 1
            })
            .Case<Certificate>(q => new {
                q.IssuerName,
                Type = 2
            })
            .ToTable("Qualifications");
    }
}

结果是DB中的以下架构： alt text

避免DRY的另一种方法是将层次结构变为TPT而不是TPH：

public class Profession {
    [Key]
    [DataMember(Order = 0)]
    public int Type { get; set; }
    [Key]
    [DataMember(Order = 1)]
    public string Code { get; set; }
    public string Title { get; set; }
}

public class Qualification {
    public int Id { get; set; }
    [Required]
    public int ProfessionType { get; set; }
    [Required]
    public string ProfessionCode { get; set; }
    [Required]
    public virtual Profession Profession { get; set; }
}

public class License : Qualification {
    public string Number { get; set; }
}

public class Certificate : Qualification {
    public string IssuerName { get; set; }
}

class Context : DbContext 
{
    public DbSet<Qualification> Qualifications { get; set; }
    public DbSet<Profession> Professions { get; set; }

    protected override void OnModelCreating(ModelBuilder modelBuilder) {
        modelBuilder.Entity<Qualification>()
            .HasRequired<Profession>(q => q.Profession)
            .HasConstraint((q, p) => q.ProfessionCode == p.Code
                                     && q.ProfessionType == p.Type);

        modelBuilder.Entity<Qualification>().MapHierarchy(q => new 
        {
            q.Id,
            q.ProfessionCode,
            q.ProfessionType,
        })
        .ToTable("Qualifications");

        modelBuilder.Entity<License>().MapHierarchy(l => new 
        {
            l.Id,
            l.Number
        })
        .ToTable("Licenses");

        modelBuilder.Entity<Certificate>().MapHierarchy(c => new 
        {
            c.Id,
            c.IssuerName
        })
        .ToTable("Certificates");
    }
}

这导致DB中的以下模式：

alt text

使用CTP4 Code First在EF4中使用外键作为TPH鉴别器

1 个答案: