我有一个Ruby哈希:
ages = { "Bruce" => 32,
"Clark" => 28
}
假设我有另一个替换名称哈希,是否有一种优雅的方法来重命名所有键,以便我最终得到:
ages = { "Bruce Wayne" => 32,
"Clark Kent" => 28
}
答案 0 :(得分:179)
ages = { "Bruce" => 32, "Clark" => 28 }
mappings = {"Bruce" => "Bruce Wayne", "Clark" => "Clark Kent"}
ages.map {|k, v| [mappings[k], v] }.to_h
答案 1 :(得分:49)
我喜欢JörgWMittag的答案,但可以改进。
如果要重命名当前Hash的密钥而不是使用重命名的密钥创建新的Hash,则以下代码段完全相同:
ages = { "Bruce" => 32, "Clark" => 28 }
mappings = {"Bruce" => "Bruce Wayne", "Clark" => "Clark Kent"}
ages.keys.each { |k| ages[ mappings[k] ] = ages.delete(k) if mappings[k] }
ages
还有一个优点就是只重命名必要的密钥。
性能考虑因素:
根据the Tin Man的回答,我的答案是<强> 20%快比JörgWMittag只用两把钥匙的Hash回答。对于具有许多键的Hashes,它可能会获得更高的性能,特别是如果只有几个键可以重命名。
答案 2 :(得分:9)
Ruby中还有未充分利用的each_with_object
方法:
ages = { "Bruce" => 32, "Clark" => 28 }
mappings = { "Bruce" => "Bruce Wayne", "Clark" => "Clark Kent" }
ages.each_with_object({}) { |(k, v), memo| memo[mappings[k]] = v }
答案 3 :(得分:8)
只是为了看看速度更快:
require 'fruity'
AGES = { "Bruce" => 32, "Clark" => 28 }
MAPPINGS = {"Bruce" => "Bruce Wayne", "Clark" => "Clark Kent"}
def jörg_w_mittag_test(ages, mappings)
Hash[ages.map {|k, v| [mappings[k], v] }]
end
require 'facets/hash/rekey'
def tyler_rick_test(ages, mappings)
ages.rekey(mappings)
end
def barbolo_test(ages, mappings)
ages.keys.each { |k| ages[ mappings[k] ] = ages.delete(k) if mappings[k] }
ages
end
class Hash
def tfr_rekey(h)
dup.tfr_rekey! h
end
def tfr_rekey!(h)
h.each { |k, newk| store(newk, delete(k)) if has_key? k }
self
end
end
def tfr_test(ages, mappings)
ages.tfr_rekey mappings
end
class Hash
def rename_keys(mapping)
result = {}
self.map do |k,v|
mapped_key = mapping[k] ? mapping[k] : k
result[mapped_key] = v.kind_of?(Hash) ? v.rename_keys(mapping) : v
result[mapped_key] = v.collect{ |obj| obj.rename_keys(mapping) if obj.kind_of?(Hash)} if v.kind_of?(Array)
end
result
end
end
def greg_test(ages, mappings)
ages.rename_keys(mappings)
end
compare do
jörg_w_mittag { jörg_w_mittag_test(AGES.dup, MAPPINGS.dup) }
tyler_rick { tyler_rick_test(AGES.dup, MAPPINGS.dup) }
barbolo { barbolo_test(AGES.dup, MAPPINGS.dup) }
greg { greg_test(AGES.dup, MAPPINGS.dup) }
end
哪个输出:
Running each test 1024 times. Test will take about 1 second.
barbolo is faster than jörg_w_mittag by 19.999999999999996% ± 10.0%
jörg_w_mittag is faster than greg by 10.000000000000009% ± 10.0%
greg is faster than tyler_rick by 30.000000000000004% ± 10.0%
警告:杠铃的解决方案使用if mappings[k]
,如果mappings[k]
导致零值,则会导致生成的哈希错误。
答案 4 :(得分:5)
我修补了类来处理嵌套的Hashes和Arrays:
# Netsted Hash:
#
# str_hash = {
# "a" => "a val",
# "b" => "b val",
# "c" => {
# "c1" => "c1 val",
# "c2" => "c2 val"
# },
# "d" => "d val",
# }
#
# mappings = {
# "a" => "apple",
# "b" => "boss",
# "c" => "cat",
# "c1" => "cat 1"
# }
# => {"apple"=>"a val", "boss"=>"b val", "cat"=>{"cat 1"=>"c1 val", "c2"=>"c2 val"}, "d"=>"d val"}
#
class Hash
def rename_keys(mapping)
result = {}
self.map do |k,v|
mapped_key = mapping[k] ? mapping[k] : k
result[mapped_key] = v.kind_of?(Hash) ? v.rename_keys(mapping) : v
result[mapped_key] = v.collect{ |obj| obj.rename_keys(mapping) if obj.kind_of?(Hash)} if v.kind_of?(Array)
end
result
end
end
答案 5 :(得分:3)
如果映射Hash小于数据Hash,则迭代映射。这对于重命名大型哈希中的几个字段非常有用:
class Hash
def rekey(h)
dup.rekey! h
end
def rekey!(h)
h.each { |k, newk| store(newk, delete(k)) if has_key? k }
self
end
end
ages = { "Bruce" => 32, "Clark" => 28, "John" => 36 }
mappings = {"Bruce" => "Bruce Wayne", "Clark" => "Clark Kent"}
p ages.rekey! mappings
答案 6 :(得分:2)
Facets gem提供了一种rekey
方法,可以完全满足您的需求。
只要您对Facets gem的依赖性没有问题,就可以将映射的哈希值传递给rekey
,它将返回带有新键的新哈希值:
require 'facets/hash/rekey'
ages = { "Bruce" => 32, "Clark" => 28 }
mappings = {"Bruce" => "Bruce Wayne", "Clark" => "Clark Kent"}
ages.rekey(mappings)
=> {"Bruce Wayne"=>32, "Clark Kent"=>28}
如果要修改年龄哈希值,可以使用rekey!
版本:
ages.rekey!(mappings)
ages
=> {"Bruce Wayne"=>32, "Clark Kent"=>28}
答案 7 :(得分:2)
您可能希望使用Object#tap以避免在修改密钥后返回ages
:
ages = { "Bruce" => 32, "Clark" => 28 }
mappings = {"Bruce" => "Bruce Wayne", "Clark" => "Clark Kent"}
ages.tap {|h| h.keys.each {|k| (h[mappings[k]] = h.delete(k)) if mappings.key?(k)}}
#=> {"Bruce Wayne"=>32, "Clark Kent"=>28}
答案 8 :(得分:1)
ages = { "Bruce" => 32, "Clark" => 28 }
mappings = {"Bruce" => "Bruce Wayne", "Clark" => "Clark Kent"}
ages = mappings.inject({}) {|memo, mapping| memo[mapping[1]] = ages[mapping[0]]; memo}
puts ages.inspect
答案 9 :(得分:0)
>> x={ :a => 'qwe', :b => 'asd'}
=> {:a=>"qwe", :b=>"asd"}
>> rename={:a=>:qwe}
=> {:a=>:qwe}
>> rename.each{|old,new| x[new] = x.delete old}
=> {:a=>:qwe}
>> x
=> {:b=>"asd", :qwe=>"qwe"}
这只会通过重命名哈希来循环。
答案 10 :(得分:0)
我用它来允许将Cucumber表中的“友好”名称解析为类属性,以便Factory Girl可以创建一个实例:
Given(/^an organization exists with the following attributes:$/) do |table|
# Build a mapping from the "friendly" text in the test to the lower_case actual name in the class
map_to_keys = Hash.new
table.transpose.hashes.first.keys.each { |x| map_to_keys[x] = x.downcase.gsub(' ', '_') }
table.transpose.hashes.each do |obj|
obj.keys.each { |k| obj[map_to_keys[k]] = obj.delete(k) if map_to_keys[k] }
create(:organization, Rack::Utils.parse_nested_query(obj.to_query))
end
end
对于它的价值,黄瓜表看起来像这样:
Background:
And an organization exists with the following attributes:
| Name | Example Org |
| Subdomain | xfdc |
| Phone Number | 123-123-1234 |
| Address | 123 E Walnut St, Anytown, PA 18999 |
| Billing Contact | Alexander Hamilton |
| Billing Address | 123 E Walnut St, Anytown, PA 18999 |
map_to_keys
看起来像这样:
{
"Name" => "name",
"Subdomain" => "subdomain",
"Phone Number" => "phone_number",
"Address" => "address",
"Billing Contact" => "billing_contact",
"Billing Address" => "billing_address"
}