Question

我用proguard构建了一个Android版本的应用程序，但是在对APK进行反编译之后，我发现那些必须被混淆的类具有正常的来源。这是我的gradle构建的一部分：

buildTypes {
    debug {
        minifyEnabled false
        proguardFiles getDefaultProguardFile('proguard-android-optimize.txt'), 'proguard-rules.pro'
    }
    release {
        minifyEnabled true
        proguardFiles getDefaultProguardFile('proguard-android-optimize.txt'), 'proguard-rules.pro'
    }
}

这是我的proguard-rules.pro文件：

-dontpreverify
-repackageclasses ''
-allowaccessmodification
-keepattributes *Annotation*

-keep public class * extends android.app.Activity
-keep public class * extends android.app.Application
-keep public class * extends android.app.Service
-keep public class * extends android.content.BroadcastReceiver
-keep public class * extends android.content.ContentProvider

-keep public class * extends android.view.View {
    public <init>(android.content.Context);
    public <init>(android.content.Context, android.util.AttributeSet);
    public <init>(android.content.Context, android.util.AttributeSet, int);
    public void set*(...);
}

-keepclasseswithmembers class * {
    public <init>(android.content.Context, android.util.AttributeSet);
}

-keepclasseswithmembers class * {
    public <init>(android.content.Context, android.util.AttributeSet, int);
}

-keepclassmembers class * implements android.os.Parcelable {
    static android.os.Parcelable$Creator CREATOR;
}

-keepclassmembers class **.R$* {
    public static <fields>;
}

-keep public class * extends android.support.v4.app.Fragment
-keep public class * extends android.app.Fragment

-keepnames class * implements java.io.Serializable

-keepclassmembers class * implements java.io.Serializable {
    static final long serialVersionUID;
    private static final java.io.ObjectStreamField[] serialPersistentFields;
    !static !transient <fields>;
    !private <fields>;
    !private <methods>;
    private void writeObject(java.io.ObjectOutputStream);
    private void readObject(java.io.ObjectInputStream);
    java.lang.Object writeReplace();
    java.lang.Object readResolve();
}

-assumenosideeffects class android.util.Log {
    public static *** e(...);
    public static *** w(...);
    public static *** wtf(...);
    public static *** d(...);
    public static *** v(...);
}

-keepclasseswithmembernames class * {
    native <methods>;
}
-keepclassmembers class * {
    public void *ButtonClicked(android.view.View);
}

-dontwarn okio**
-dontwarn java.lang.invoke**
-dontwarn org.apache.commons.io**
-dontwarn org.codehaus**
-keep public class java.nio**
-dontwarn android.support.v4.**
-keep class android.support.v4.** { *; }
-dontwarn android.support.v7.**
-keep class android.support.v7.** { *; }
-keep class net.sqlcipher.** { *; }

-keep class net.sqlcipher.database.** { *; }

-keep class retrofit2.** { *; }
-keepattributes Signature
-keepattributes Exceptions
-keepclasseswithmembers class * {
    @retrofit2.http.* <methods>;
}
-keep class com.squareup.okhttp.** { *; }
-keep interface com.squareup.okhttp.** { *; }
-keep class com.google.gson.** { *; }
-keep class com.google.inject.* { *; }
-keep class org.apache.http.** { *; }
-keep class org.apache.james.mime4j.** { *; }
-keep class javax.inject.** { *; }
-keepclassmembernames interface * {
    @retrofit.http.* <methods>;
}

-keep class sun.misc.Unsafe { *; }
-keep public class !com.vidal.cardio.datas.MySQLCipherOpenHelper { *; }
-keep public class !com.vidal.cardio.datas.SCLcipherOpenHelper { *; }

好吧，我预计MySQLCipherOpenHelper和SCLcipherOpenHelper会被混淆，但事实上他们没有。也许在proguard-rules.pro中有一个错误？

Answer 1

保持规则将彼此独立地进行分析和处理，因此如果您编写这样的规则

-keep public class !com.vidal.cardio.datas.MySQLCipherOpenHelper { *; }
-keep public class !com.vidal.cardio.datas.SCLcipherOpenHelper { *; }

ProGuard将执行以下操作：

处理第一条规则以保留除MySQLCipherOpenHelper以外的所有内容
处理第二条规则以保留除SCLcipherOpenHelper以外的所有内容

正如您所看到的，使用第一个规则，您也隐含地保留第二个类，而使用第二个规则，您也保留第一个规则。

为了不同时保留它们，你必须合并这样的规则：

-keep public class !com.vidal.cardio.datas.MySQLCipherOpenHelper, 
                   !com.vidal.cardio.datas.SCLcipherOpenHelper { *; }

Android proguard不会混淆类

1 个答案: