Question

我有一个域模型/实体，取决于它的填充方式需要以不同方式进行验证。假设我提出了3个验证器，如下所示：

public class Product1Validator : AbstractValidator<Ticket>
{
    public Product1Validator()
    {
        RuleFor(ticket => ticket.Policy.PolicyNumber)
         .NotEmpty()
         .WithMessage("Policy Number is missing.");

        RuleFor(ticket => ticket.Policy.ApplSignedInState)
         .NotEmpty()
         .WithMessage("Application Signed In State is missing or invalid.");
    }
}

public class Product2Validator : AbstractValidator<Ticket>
{
    public Product2Validator()
    {
        RuleFor(ticket => ticket.Policy.PolicyNumber)
         .NotEmpty()
         .WithMessage("Policy Number is missing.");

        RuleFor(ticket => ticket.Policy.ApplSignedInState)
         .NotEmpty()
         .WithMessage("Application Signed In State is missing or invalid.");
    }
}


public class Product3Validator : AbstractValidator<Ticket>
{
    public Product3Validator()
    {
        RuleFor(ticket => ticket.Policy.PolicyNumber)
         .NotEmpty()
         .WithMessage("Policy Number is missing.");

        RuleFor(ticket => ticket.Policy.ApplSignedInState)
         .NotEmpty()
         .WithMessage("Application Signed In State is missing or invalid.");

        RuleFor(ticket => ticket.Policy.DistributionChannel)
         .NotEmpty()
         .WithMessage("Distribution Channel is missing."); 
    }
}

如何重构重复的RuleFor（s），以便它们只有一个并由不同的验证器共享？

谢谢你，斯蒂芬

更新

我使用了Ouarzy的想法，但是当我编写代码来验证它不会编译时。

[TestMethod]
public void CanChainRules()
{
    var ticket = new Ticket();
    ticket.Policy = new Policy();
    ticket.Policy.ApplSignedInState = "CA";
    ticket.Policy.PolicyNumber = "";
    ticket.Policy.DistributionChannel = null;

    var val = new Product1Validator();
    var result = val.Validate(ticket); //There is no Method 'Validate'
    Assert.IsTrue(!result.IsValid);
    Console.WriteLine(result.Errors.GetValidationText());
}

更新2

问题是新的复合验证器并没有从AbstractValidator继承，一旦我纠正它编译它，但它们似乎不起作用。

public class Product1Validator : AbstractValidator<Ticket>
{
    public Product1Validator()
    {
        TicketValidator.Validate().Policy().ApplSignedState();
    }
}

更新3

在对原始答案严厉批评并直接在GitHub上与Jeremy联系之后，我提出了以下建议：

class Program{
    static void Main(string[] args){
        var p = new Person();
        var pv = new PersonValidator();
        var vr = pv.Validate(p);
        //Console.ReadKey();
    }
}

class Person
{
    public string FirstName { get; set; }
    public string LastName { get; set; }
    public DateTime BirthDate { get; set; }
}

class PersonValidator : AbstractValidator<Person>
{
    public PersonValidator()
    {
        CascadeMode = CascadeMode.Continue;
        this.FirstName();
        this.LastName();
    }
}

static class Extensions
{
    public static void FirstName(this AbstractValidator<Person> a)
    {
        a.RuleFor(b => b.FirstName).NotEmpty();
    }
    public static void LastName(this AbstractValidator<Person> a)
    {
        a.RuleFor(b => b.LastName).NotEmpty();
    }
}

Answer 1

在您的情况下，我可能会尝试使用所有规则为Ticket构建流畅的验证，然后为每个产品调用所需的验证。类似的东西：

public class TicketValidator : AbstractValidator<Ticket>
{
    public TicketValidator Policy()
    {
        RuleFor(ticket => ticket.Policy.PolicyNumber)
         .NotEmpty()
         .WithMessage("Policy Number is missing.");

        return this;
    }

    public TicketValidator ApplSignedState()
    {
        RuleFor(ticket => ticket.Policy.ApplSignedInState)
         .NotEmpty()
         .WithMessage("Application Signed In State is missing or invalid.");

        return this;
    }

    public TicketValidator DistributionChannel()
    {
        RuleFor(ticket => ticket.Policy.DistributionChannel)
        .NotEmpty()
        .WithMessage("Distribution Channel is missing.");

        return this;
    }

    public static TicketValidator Validate()
    {
        return new TicketValidator();
    }
}

然后使用流利的语法为每个产品设置一个验证器：

public class Product1Validator
{
    public Product1Validator()
    {
        TicketValidator.Validate().Policy().ApplSignedState();
    }
}  

public class Product2Validator
{
    public Product2Validator()
    {
        TicketValidator.Validate().Policy().ApplSignedState();
    }
}  

public class Product3Validator
{
    public Product3Validator()
    {
        TicketValidator.Validate().Policy().ApplSignedState().DistributionChannel();
    }
}

我没有尝试编译此代码，但我希望您能看到这个想法。

希望它有所帮助。

Answer 2

集中式扩展方法

我想在多种不同类型的对象中使用它们。

我通过创建集中式扩展方法来做到这一点。

一个简单的例子：

扩展方法

namespace FluentValidation
{
    public static class LengthValidator
    {
        public static IRuleBuilderOptions<T, string> 
           CustomerIdLength<T>(this IRuleBuilder<T, string> ruleBuilder)
        {
            return ruleBuilder.Length<T>(1, 0);
        }
    }
}

使用

public class CreateCustomerValidator : AbstractValidator<CreateCustomerCommand>
{
    public CreateCustomerValidator()
    {
        RuleFor(x => x.CustomerId).CustomerIdLength();
    }
}

当类型化对象通过泛型传递时，它可以跨多个对象使用，而不仅仅是一个对象，即

public class UpdateCustomerValidator : AbstractValidator<UpdateCustomerCommand>

如何组织FluentValidation规则，以便它们可以在多个验证器中重用？

2 个答案: