我试图创建一个阻塞主线程的线程池，直到所有孩子都完成为止。现实世界的用例是一个＆＃34;控制器＆＃34;产生独立进程以供用户交互的进程。
不幸的是，当main退出时，会遇到分段错误。我无法弄清楚这种分段错误的原因。
我已经创作了一个Process类，这只不过是打开一个shell脚本（名为waiter.sh，其中包含sleep 5）并等待pid退出。初始化Process类，然后将Wait()方法放在线程池中的一个线程中。
调用~thread_pool()时会出现问题。 std::queue无法正确释放传递给它的boost::function，即使对Process的引用仍然有效。
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/wait.h>
#include <spawn.h>
#include <queue>
#include <boost/bind.hpp>
#include <boost/thread.hpp>
extern char **environ;
class Process {
private:
pid_t pid;
int status;
public:
Process() : status(0), pid(-1) {
}
~Process() {
std::cout << "calling ~Process" << std::endl;
}
void Spawn(char **argv) {
// want spawn posix and wait for th epid to return
status = posix_spawn(&pid, "waiter.sh", NULL, NULL, argv, environ);
if (status != 0) {
perror("unable to spawn");
return;
}
}
void Wait() {
std::cout << "spawned proc with " << pid << std::endl;
waitpid(pid, &status, 0);
// wait(&pid);
std::cout << "wait complete" << std::endl;
}
};
以下是thread_pool课程。这是从question
class thread_pool {
private:
std::queue<boost::function<void() >> tasks;
boost::thread_group threads;
std::size_t available;
boost::mutex mutex;
boost::condition_variable condition;
bool running;
public:
thread_pool(std::size_t pool_size) : available(pool_size), running(true) {
std::cout << "creating " << pool_size << " threads" << std::endl;
for (std::size_t i = 0; i < available; ++i) {
threads.create_thread(boost::bind(&thread_pool::pool_main, this));
}
}
~thread_pool() {
std::cout << "~thread_pool" << std::endl;
{
boost::unique_lock<boost::mutex> lock(mutex);
running = false;
condition.notify_all();
}
try {
threads.join_all();
} catch (const std::exception &) {
// supress exceptions
}
}
template <typename Task>
void run_task(Task task) {
boost::unique_lock<boost::mutex> lock(mutex);
if (0 == available) {
return; //\todo err
}
--available;
tasks.push(boost::function<void()>(task));
condition.notify_one();
return;
}
private:
void pool_main() {
// wait on condition variable while the task is empty and the pool is still
// running
boost::unique_lock<boost::mutex> lock(mutex);
while (tasks.empty() && running) {
condition.wait(lock);
}
// copy task locally and remove from the queue. this is
// done within it's own scope so that the task object is destructed
// immediately after running the task. This is useful in the
// event that the function contains shared_ptr arguments
// bound via 'bind'
{
auto task = tasks.front();
tasks.pop();
lock.unlock();
// run the task
try {
std::cout << "running task" << std::endl;
task();
} catch (const std::exception &) {
// supress
}
}
// task has finished so increment count of availabe threads
lock.lock();
++available;
}
};
这是主要的：
int main() {
// input arguments are not required
char *argv[] = {NULL};
Process process;
process.Spawn(argv);
thread_pool pool(5);
pool.run_task(boost::bind(&Process::Wait, &process));
return 0;
}
此输出为
creating 5 threads
~thread_pool
I am waiting... (from waiting.sh)
running task
spawned proc with 2573
running task
running task
running task
running task
wait complete
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
这是堆栈跟踪：
Starting program: /home/jandreau/NetBeansProjects/Controller/dist/Debug/GNU- Linux/controller
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libthread_db.so.1".
creating 5 threads
[New Thread 0x7ffff691d700 (LWP 2600)]
[New Thread 0x7ffff611c700 (LWP 2601)]
[New Thread 0x7ffff591b700 (LWP 2602)]
[New Thread 0x7ffff511a700 (LWP 2603)]
[New Thread 0x7ffff4919700 (LWP 2604)]
~thread_pool
running task
running task
spawned proc with 2599
[Thread 0x7ffff611c700 (LWP 2601) exited]
running task
[Thread 0x7ffff591b700 (LWP 2602) exited]
running task
[Thread 0x7ffff511a700 (LWP 2603) exited]
running task
[Thread 0x7ffff4919700 (LWP 2604) exited]
I am waiting...
wait complete
[Thread 0x7ffff691d700 (LWP 2600) exited]
Thread 1 "controller" received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x000000000040f482 in boost::detail::function::basic_vtable0<void>::clear (
this=0xa393935322068, functor=...)
at /usr/include/boost/function/function_template.hpp:509
509 if (base.manager)
(gdb) where
#0 0x000000000040f482 in boost::detail::function::basic_vtable0<void>::clear (
this=0xa393935322068, functor=...)
at /usr/include/boost/function/function_template.hpp:509
#1 0x000000000040e263 in boost::function0<void>::clear (this=0x62ef50)
at /usr/include/boost/function/function_template.hpp:883
#2 0x000000000040cf20 in boost::function0<void>::~function0 (this=0x62ef50,
__in_chrg=<optimized out>)
at /usr/include/boost/function/function_template.hpp:765
#3 0x000000000040b28e in boost::function<void ()>::~function() (
this=0x62ef50, __in_chrg=<optimized out>)
at /usr/include/boost/function/function_template.hpp:1056
#4 0x000000000041193a in std::_Destroy<boost::function<void ()> >(boost::function<void ()>*) (__pointer=0x62ef50)
at /usr/include/c++/5/bits/stl_construct.h:93
#5 0x00000000004112df in std::_Destroy_aux<false>::__destroy<boost::function<void ()>*>(boost::function<void ()>*, boost::function<void ()>*) (
__first=0x62ef50, __last=0x62ed50)
at /usr/include/c++/5/bits/stl_construct.h:103
#6 0x0000000000410d16 in std::_Destroy<boost::function<void ()>*>(boost::function<void ()>*, boost::function<void ()>*) (__first=0x62edd0, __last=0x62ed50)
at /usr/include/c++/5/bits/stl_construct.h:126
#7 0x0000000000410608 in std::_Destroy<boost::function<void ()>*, boost::function<void ()> >(boost::function<void ()>*, boost::function<void ()>*, std::allocat---Type <return> to continue, or q <return> to quit---
or<boost::function<void ()> >&) (__first=0x62edd0, __last=0x62ed50)
at /usr/include/c++/5/bits/stl_construct.h:151
#8 0x000000000040fac5 in std::deque<boost::function<void ()>, std::allocator<boost::function<void ()> > >::_M_destroy_data_aux(std::_Deque_iterator<boost::function<void ()>, boost::function<void ()>&, boost::function<void ()>*>, std::_Deque_iterator<boost::function<void ()>, boost::function<void ()>&, boost::function<void ()>*>) (this=0x7fffffffdaf0, __first=..., __last=...)
at /usr/include/c++/5/bits/deque.tcc:845
#9 0x000000000040e6e4 in std::deque<boost::function<void ()>, std::allocator<boost::function<void ()> > >::_M_destroy_data(std::_Deque_iterator<boost::function<void ()>, boost::function<void ()>&, boost::function<void ()>*>, std::_Deque_iterator<boost::function<void ()>, boost::function<void ()>&, boost::function<void ()>*>, std::allocator<boost::function<void ()> > const&) (
this=0x7fffffffdaf0, __first=..., __last=...)
at /usr/include/c++/5/bits/stl_deque.h:2037
#10 0x000000000040d0c8 in std::deque<boost::function<void ()>, std::allocator<boost::function<void ()> > >::~deque() (this=0x7fffffffdaf0,
__in_chrg=<optimized out>) at /usr/include/c++/5/bits/stl_deque.h:1039
#11 0x000000000040b3ce in std::queue<boost::function<void ()>, std::deque<boost::function<void ()>, std::allocator<boost::function<void ()> > > >::~queue() (
this=0x7fffffffdaf0, __in_chrg=<optimized out>)
at /usr/include/c++/5/bits/stl_queue.h:96
#12 0x000000000040b6c0 in thread_pool::~thread_pool (this=0x7fffffffdaf0,
---Type <return> to continue, or q <return> to quit---
__in_chrg=<optimized out>) at main.cpp:63
#13 0x0000000000408b60 in main () at main.cpp:140
我对此感到困惑，因为Process还没有超出范围，我将boost::function<void()>的副本传递给线程池进行处理
有什么想法吗？
答案 0 :(得分：1)
堆栈跟踪表明您正在销毁尚未正确初始化的std::function（例如，被视为std::function的某个随机内存位置）或者您正在销毁{{1两次。
问题是你的程序只推送std::function一次，但弹出五次，因此你从空的双端队列中删除元素，这是未定义的行为。
如果tasks为false，则while中的pool_main循环终止，即使running为空，running也可能为false。然后你deque无条件地。您可以考虑按如下方式更正pop：
pool_main但是，我不确定void pool_main() {
// wait on condition variable
// while the task is empty and the pool is still
// running
boost::unique_lock<boost::mutex> lock(mutex);
while (tasks.empty() && running) {
condition.wait(lock);
}
// copy task locally and remove from the queue. this is
// done within it's own scope so that the task object is destructed
// immediately after running the task. This is useful in the
// event that the function contains shared_ptr arguments
// bound via 'bind'
if (!tasks.empty ()) { // <--- !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
auto task = tasks.front();
tasks.pop();
lock.unlock();
// run the task
try {
std::cout << "running task" << std::endl;
task();
} catch (const std::exception &) {
// supress
}
}
// task has finished so increment count of availabe threads
lock.lock();
++available;
};
的逻辑是否正确。不应该在开始处理任务时递减available，并在完成任务时递增（因此仅在available内更改，并且仅在新引入的pool_main子句内更改） ？
答案 1 :(得分：0)
您似乎没有为
分配内存extern char **environ;
的任何地方。虽然这不是链接错误吗？
将此切回到最小的复制案例中会有很大帮助。这里有很多代码，可能没有必要重现这个问题。
另外，这是什么：
// supress exceptions
如果你在加入你的线程时遇到异常，那么你可能没有加入它们并清理线程而不加入它们会在主要退出后导致错误。