由于for循环实现,执行这些循环需要很多时间
如何更快地替换它,下面的表格也没有太多记录,另外我也制作了主键,但for循环仍然很慢
public List<BusinessLayer.Transactions.CDANumberTracking> GetPOUnusedCDANumberTrackingItems(string code)
{
List<BusinessLayer.Transactions.CDANumberTracking> results = new List<BusinessLayer.Transactions.CDANumberTracking>();
List<Entity.Transactions.CDANumberTracking> SoUsedBagList = new List<Entity.Transactions.CDANumberTracking>();
List<Entity.Transactions.POCDANumberTracking> rejects = new List<SalesOrderModule.Entity.Transactions.POCDANumberTracking>();
List<Entity.Transactions.POCDANumberTracking> returns = new List<SalesOrderModule.Entity.Transactions.POCDANumberTracking>();
List<Entity.Transactions.POCDANumberTracking> rejectList = new List<SalesOrderModule.Entity.Transactions.POCDANumberTracking>();
List<Entity.Transactions.POCDANumberTracking> returnRejectList = new List<SalesOrderModule.Entity.Transactions.POCDANumberTracking>();
List<Entity.Transactions.POCDANumberTracking> SearchList = new List<SalesOrderModule.Entity.Transactions.POCDANumberTracking>();
try
{
if (!InOpenLookup)
(Connection as SQL).BeginTransaction();
DataLayer.Tables.PLSPOCDANumberTrackingDNew sampleTable = new SalesOrderModule.DataLayer.Tables.PLSPOCDANumberTrackingDNew(this.Connection);
sampleTable.SearchCriteria[0].Value = code.Trim();
sampleTable.SearchCriteria[1].Value = (int)0;
List<Entity.Transactions.POCDANumberTracking> results1 = sampleTable.Reads(false);
if (results1.Count > 0)
{
rejectList.AddRange(results1);
}
DataLayer.Tables.PLSPOCDANumberTrackingReturnD sampleTable2 = new SalesOrderModule.DataLayer.Tables.PLSPOCDANumberTrackingReturnD(this.Connection);
sampleTable2.SearchCriteria[0].Value = code.Trim();
List<Entity.Transactions.POCDANumberTracking> results2 = sampleTable2.Reads(false);
if (results2.Count > 0)
{
returnRejectList.AddRange(results2);
}
DataLayer.Tables.PLSPOCDANumberTrackingD sampleTable3 = new SalesOrderModule.DataLayer.Tables.PLSPOCDANumberTrackingD(this.Connection);
sampleTable3.SearchCriteria[0].Value = code.Trim();
SearchList = sampleTable3.Reads(false);
DataLayer.Tables.PSOMCDANumberTrackingD sampleTable4 = new SalesOrderModule.DataLayer.Tables.PSOMCDANumberTrackingD(this.Connection, null);
sampleTable4.SearchCriteria[3].Value = code.Trim();
sampleTable4.SearchCriteria[6].Value = false;
SoUsedBagList = sampleTable4.Read(false);
//process data...
Entity.Transactions.POCDANumberTracking temp;
foreach (Entity.Transactions.POCDANumberTracking rejectItem in rejectList)
{
for (int i = rejectItem.From; i <= rejectItem.To; i++)
{
temp = new SalesOrderModule.Entity.Transactions.POCDANumberTracking();
temp.From = i;
temp.To = i;
temp.Code = rejectItem.Code.Trim();
temp.GrnNo = rejectItem.GrnNo.Trim();
temp.WbcNo = rejectItem.WbcNo.Trim();
rejects.Add(temp);
}
}
//returns
foreach (Entity.Transactions.POCDANumberTracking returnItem in returnRejectList)
{
for (int i = returnItem.From; i <= returnItem.To; i++)
{
temp = new SalesOrderModule.Entity.Transactions.POCDANumberTracking();
temp.From = i;
temp.To = i;
temp.Code = returnItem.Code.Trim();
temp.GrnNo = returnItem.GrnNo.Trim();
temp.WbcNo = returnItem.WbcNo.Trim();
returns.Add(temp);
}
}
Entity.Transactions.CDANumberTracking temp2;
Entity.Transactions.CDANumberTracking temp3;
Entity.Transactions.POCDANumberTracking temp4;
foreach (Entity.Transactions.POCDANumberTracking searchItem in SearchList)
{
for (int i = searchItem.From; i <= searchItem.To; i++)
{
temp = null;
temp3 = null;
temp4 = null;
//check if the bag is on reject list
temp = rejects.Find(delegate(Entity.Transactions.POCDANumberTracking tc) { return (tc.From == i && tc.WbcNo.Trim().ToUpper() == searchItem.WbcNo.Trim().ToUpper() && tc.GrnNo.Trim().ToUpper() == searchItem.GrnNo.Trim().ToUpper()); });
if (temp != null)
continue;
//check if the bag is on return list
temp4 = returns.Find(delegate(Entity.Transactions.POCDANumberTracking tcc) { return (tcc.From == i && tcc.GrnNo.Trim().ToUpper() == searchItem.GrnNo.Trim().ToUpper()); });
if (temp4 != null)
continue;
//check if the bag is alredy used in So module...
temp3 = SoUsedBagList.Find(delegate(Entity.Transactions.CDANumberTracking cda) { return (cda.Code.Trim().ToUpper() == searchItem.Code.Trim().ToUpper() && cda.BagNo == searchItem.From); });
if (temp3 != null)
continue;
temp2 = new SalesOrderModule.Entity.Transactions.CDANumberTracking();
temp2.BagNo = i;
temp2.Code = searchItem.Code.Trim();
temp2.LineNo = 0;
temp2.Location = string.Empty;
temp2.WbcNo = string.Empty;
temp2.ID = null;
temp2.IsReturned = false;
temp2.IsSelected = false;
temp2.ItemNo = string.Empty;
temp2.Status = SalesOrderModule.Entity.ModifyStatus.New;
results.Add(BusinessLayer.Transactions.CDANumberTracking.GetCDANumberTracking(this, temp2, null));
}
}
if (!InOpenLookup)
(Connection as SQL).EndTransaction();
}
catch (Exception er)
{
if (!InOpenLookup)
(Connection as SQL).Rollback();
throw er;
}
return results;
}
每个需要放置的第二个for循环......需要一些帮助
答案 0 :(得分:1)
你应该尽可能地将内循环分解出来。正如代码现在所示,您不必重复以下操作:
returnItem.Code.Trim();
returnItem.GrnNo.Trim();
returnItem.WbcNo.Trim();
我没有足够的信息来判断这是否会对性能产生任何影响。
其他嫌犯是new SalesOrderModule.Entity.Transactions.POCDANumberTracking()
和returns.Add(temp)
。如果returns
是某种有序列表,那么这可能会带来相当大的性能损失。如果它只是一个简单的List
那么它就不应该,并且你无论如何都无法改进它。
关于构造函数,只有你知道它有多贵,但你也无法避免它。
所有这些,你的代码看起来像这样:
Entity.Transactions.POCDANumberTracking temp;
foreach (Entity.Transactions.POCDANumberTracking returnItem in returnRejectList)
{
var code = returnItem.Code.Trim();
var grnNo = returnItem.GrnNo.Trim();
var wbcNo = returnItem.WbcNo.Trim();
for (int i = returnItem.From; i <= returnItem.To; i++)
{
temp = new SalesOrderModule.Entity.Transactions.POCDANumberTracking();
temp.From = i;
temp.To = i;
temp.Code = code;
temp.GrnNo = grnNo;
temp.WbcNo = wbcNo;
returns.Add(temp);
}
}
答案 1 :(得分:0)
我必须限制foreach循环下的条目,这是调试代码的最佳方法
所以数据层代码在
中引用sampleTable.Reads(false);
sampleTable2.Reads(false);
sampleTable3.Reads(false);
sampleTable4.Reads(false);
需要通过包含搜索项(我的意思是SQL语句)来修改