什么是检查点是否在python中的多边形内的最快方法

时间：2016-04-04 09:50:23

标签： python matplotlib

我找到了两种主要的方法来查看一个点是否属于多边形。一种是使用光线追踪方法here，这是最推荐的答案，另一种是使用matplotlib path.contains_points（这对我来说似乎有些模糊）。我将不得不连续检查很多点。有人知道这两个中的任何一个是否比另一个更值得推荐，或者是否有更好的第三选择？

更新：

我检查了两种方法，matplotlib看起来更快。 

from time import time
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.path as mpltPath

# regular polygon for testing
lenpoly = 100
polygon = [[np.sin(x)+0.5,np.cos(x)+0.5] for x in np.linspace(0,2*np.pi,lenpoly)[:-1]]

# random points set of points to test 
N = 10000
points = zip(np.random.random(N),np.random.random(N))


# Ray tracing
def ray_tracing_method(x,y,poly):

    n = len(poly)
    inside = False

    p1x,p1y = poly[0]
    for i in range(n+1):
        p2x,p2y = poly[i % n]
        if y > min(p1y,p2y):
            if y <= max(p1y,p2y):
                if x <= max(p1x,p2x):
                    if p1y != p2y:
                        xints = (y-p1y)*(p2x-p1x)/(p2y-p1y)+p1x
                    if p1x == p2x or x <= xints:
                        inside = not inside
        p1x,p1y = p2x,p2y

    return inside

start_time = time()
inside1 = [ray_tracing_method(point[0], point[1], polygon) for point in points]
print "Ray Tracing Elapsed time: " + str(time()-start_time)

# Matplotlib mplPath
start_time = time()
path = mpltPath.Path(polygon)
inside2 = path.contains_points(points)
print "Matplotlib contains_points Elapsed time: " + str(time()-start_time)

给出，

Ray Tracing Elapsed time: 0.441395998001
Matplotlib contains_points Elapsed time: 0.00994491577148

使用三角形而不是100边多边形获得相同的相对差异。我也会检查一下，因为它看起来只是专门针对这类问题的包

6 个答案:

答案 0 :(得分：47)

您可以考虑shapely：

from shapely.geometry import Point
from shapely.geometry.polygon import Polygon

point = Point(0.5, 0.5)
polygon = Polygon([(0, 0), (0, 1), (1, 1), (1, 0)])
print(polygon.contains(point))

从您提到的方法我只使用了第二个path.contains_points，它运行正常。在任何情况下，根据测试所需的精度，我建议创建一个numpy bool网格，其中多边形内的所有节点都为True（否则为False）。如果你打算对很多点进行测试，这可能会更快（虽然注意到这依赖于你在“像素”容差范围内进行测试）：

from matplotlib import path
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import numpy as np

first = -3
size  = (3-first)/100
xv,yv = np.meshgrid(np.linspace(-3,3,100),np.linspace(-3,3,100))
p = path.Path([(0,0), (0, 1), (1, 1), (1, 0)])  # square with legs length 1 and bottom left corner at the origin
flags = p.contains_points(np.hstack((xv.flatten()[:,np.newaxis],yv.flatten()[:,np.newaxis])))
grid = np.zeros((101,101),dtype='bool')
grid[((xv.flatten()-first)/size).astype('int'),((yv.flatten()-first)/size).astype('int')] = flags

xi,yi = np.random.randint(-300,300,100)/100,np.random.randint(-300,300,100)/100
vflag = grid[((xi-first)/size).astype('int'),((yi-first)/size).astype('int')]
plt.imshow(grid.T,origin='lower',interpolation='nearest',cmap='binary')
plt.scatter(((xi-first)/size).astype('int'),((yi-first)/size).astype('int'),c=vflag,cmap='Greens',s=90)
plt.show()

，结果如下：

point inside polygon within pixel tolerance

答案 1 :(得分：7)

您的测试很好，但它只测量某些特定情况： 我们有一个具有许多顶点的多边形，以及用于在多边形内检查它们的长数组点。

而且，我想你不是在测量 matplotlib-inside-polygon-method vs ray-method， 但 matplotlib-somehow-optimized-iteration vs simple-list-iteration

让我们进行N次独立比较（N对点和多边形）？

# ... your code...
lenpoly = 100
polygon = [[np.sin(x)+0.5,np.cos(x)+0.5] for x in np.linspace(0,2*np.pi,lenpoly)[:-1]]

M = 10000
start_time = time()
# Ray tracing
for i in range(M):
    x,y = np.random.random(), np.random.random()
    inside1 = ray_tracing_method(x,y, polygon)
print "Ray Tracing Elapsed time: " + str(time()-start_time)

# Matplotlib mplPath
start_time = time()
for i in range(M):
    x,y = np.random.random(), np.random.random()
    inside2 = path.contains_points([[x,y]])
print "Matplotlib contains_points Elapsed time: " + str(time()-start_time)

结果：

Ray Tracing Elapsed time: 0.548588991165
Matplotlib contains_points Elapsed time: 0.103765010834

Matplotlib仍然好得多，但不是100倍。 现在让我们尝试更简单的多边形...... 

lenpoly = 5
# ... same code

结果：

Ray Tracing Elapsed time: 0.0727779865265
Matplotlib contains_points Elapsed time: 0.105288982391

答案 2 :(得分：6)

如果速度是您所需要的并且额外的依赖性不是问题，您可能会发现numba非常有用（现在在任何平台上都很容易安装）。您提出的经典ray_tracing方法可以通过使用numba装饰器并将多边形转换为numpy数组轻松移植到numba @jit。代码应如下所示：

@jit(nopython=True)
def ray_tracing(x,y,poly):
    n = len(poly)
    inside = False
    p2x = 0.0
    p2y = 0.0
    xints = 0.0
    p1x,p1y = poly[0]
    for i in range(n+1):
        p2x,p2y = poly[i % n]
        if y > min(p1y,p2y):
            if y <= max(p1y,p2y):
                if x <= max(p1x,p2x):
                    if p1y != p2y:
                    xints = (y-p1y)*(p2x-p1x)/(p2y-p1y)+p1x
                    if p1x == p2x or x <= xints:
                        inside = not inside
        p1x,p1y = p2x,p2y

    return inside

第一次执行将比任何后续调用花费更长的时间：

%%time
polygon=np.array(polygon)
inside1 = [numba_ray_tracing_method(point[0], point[1], polygon) for 
point in points]

CPU times: user 129 ms, sys: 4.08 ms, total: 133 ms
Wall time: 132 ms

编译后会减少到：

CPU times: user 18.7 ms, sys: 320 µs, total: 19.1 ms
Wall time: 18.4 ms

如果在第一次调用函数时需要速度，则可以使用pycc在模块中预编译代码。将函数存储在src.py中，如：

from numba import jit
from numba.pycc import CC
cc = CC('nbspatial')


@cc.export('ray_tracing',  'b1(f8, f8, f8[:,:])')
@jit(nopython=True)
def ray_tracing(x,y,poly):
    n = len(poly)
    inside = False
    p2x = 0.0
    p2y = 0.0
    xints = 0.0
    p1x,p1y = poly[0]
    for i in range(n+1):
        p2x,p2y = poly[i % n]
        if y > min(p1y,p2y):
            if y <= max(p1y,p2y):
                if x <= max(p1x,p2x):
                    if p1y != p2y:
                        xints = (y-p1y)*(p2x-p1x)/(p2y-p1y)+p1x
                    if p1x == p2x or x <= xints:
                        inside = not inside
        p1x,p1y = p2x,p2y

    return inside


if __name__ == "__main__":
    cc.compile()

使用python src.py构建并运行：

import nbspatial

import numpy as np
lenpoly = 100
polygon = [[np.sin(x)+0.5,np.cos(x)+0.5] for x in 
np.linspace(0,2*np.pi,lenpoly)[:-1]]

# random points set of points to test 
N = 10000
# making a list instead of a generator to help debug
points = zip(np.random.random(N),np.random.random(N))

polygon = np.array(polygon)

%%time
result = [nbspatial.ray_tracing(point[0], point[1], polygon) for point in points]

CPU times: user 20.7 ms, sys: 64 µs, total: 20.8 ms
Wall time: 19.9 ms

在我使用的numba代码中：     ＆＃39; b1（f8，f8，f8 [：，]]和＃39;

为了使用nopython=True进行编译，需要在for loop之前声明每个var。

在prebuild src代码中的行：

@cc.export('ray_tracing',  'b1(f8, f8, f8[:,:])')

用于声明函数名称及其I / O var类型，布尔输出b1和两个浮点f8以及浮点f8[:,:]的二维数组作为输入。

答案 3 :(得分：1)

不同方法的比较

我找到了其他方法来检查点是否在多边形内 (here)。我只测试了其中的两个（is_inside_sm 和 is_inside_postgis），结果与其他方法相同。

感谢@epifanio，我将代码并行化并与@epifanio 和@user3274748 (ray_tracing_numpy) 方法进行了比较。请注意，这两种方法都有一个错误，所以我按照下面的代码所示修复了它们。

我发现的另一件事是，为创建多边形提供的代码不会生成闭合路径 np.linspace(0,2*np.pi,lenpoly)[:-1]。因此，上述 GitHub 存储库中提供的代码可能无法正常工作。所以最好创建一个封闭路径（第一个和最后一个点应该相同）。

代码

方法一：parallelpointinpolygon

from numba import jit, njit
import numba
import numpy as np 

@jit(nopython=True)
def pointinpolygon(x,y,poly):
    n = len(poly)
    inside = False
    p2x = 0.0
    p2y = 0.0
    xints = 0.0
    p1x,p1y = poly[0]
    for i in numba.prange(n+1):
        p2x,p2y = poly[i % n]
        if y > min(p1y,p2y):
            if y <= max(p1y,p2y):
                if x <= max(p1x,p2x):
                    if p1y != p2y:
                        xints = (y-p1y)*(p2x-p1x)/(p2y-p1y)+p1x
                    if p1x == p2x or x <= xints:
                        inside = not inside
        p1x,p1y = p2x,p2y

    return inside


@njit(parallel=True)
def parallelpointinpolygon(points, polygon):
    D = np.empty(len(points), dtype=numba.boolean) 
    for i in numba.prange(0, len(D)):   #<-- Fixed here, must start from zero
        D[i] = pointinpolygon(points[i,0], points[i,1], polygon)
    return D

方法二：ray_tracing_numpy_numba

@jit(nopython=True)
def ray_tracing_numpy_numba(points,poly):
    x,y = points[:,0], points[:,1]
    n = len(poly)
    inside = np.zeros(len(x),np.bool_)
    p2x = 0.0
    p2y = 0.0
    p1x,p1y = poly[0]
    for i in range(n+1):
        p2x,p2y = poly[i % n]
        idx = np.nonzero((y > min(p1y,p2y)) & (y <= max(p1y,p2y)) & (x <= max(p1x,p2x)))[0]
        if len(idx):    # <-- Fixed here. If idx is null skip comparisons below.
            if p1y != p2y:
                xints = (y[idx]-p1y)*(p2x-p1x)/(p2y-p1y)+p1x
            if p1x == p2x:
                inside[idx] = ~inside[idx]
            else:
                idxx = idx[x[idx] <= xints]
                inside[idxx] = ~inside[idxx]    

        p1x,p1y = p2x,p2y
    return inside

方法 3： Matplotlib contains_points

path = mpltPath.Path(polygon,closed=True)  # <-- Very important to mention that the path 
                                           #     is closed (default is false)

方法 4： is_inside_sm（从 here 获得）

@jit(nopython=True)
def is_inside_sm(polygon, point):
    length = len(polygon)-1
    dy2 = point[1] - polygon[0][1]
    intersections = 0
    ii = 0
    jj = 1

    while ii<length:
        dy  = dy2
        dy2 = point[1] - polygon[jj][1]

        # consider only lines which are not completely above/bellow/right from the point
        if dy*dy2 <= 0.0 and (point[0] >= polygon[ii][0] or point[0] >= polygon[jj][0]):

            # non-horizontal line
            if dy<0 or dy2<0:
                F = dy*(polygon[jj][0] - polygon[ii][0])/(dy-dy2) + polygon[ii][0]

                if point[0] > F: # if line is left from the point - the ray moving towards left, will intersect it
                    intersections += 1
                elif point[0] == F: # point on line
                    return 2

            # point on upper peak (dy2=dx2=0) or horizontal line (dy=dy2=0 and dx*dx2<=0)
            elif dy2==0 and (point[0]==polygon[jj][0] or (dy==0 and (point[0]-polygon[ii][0])*(point[0]-polygon[jj][0])<=0)):
                return 2

        ii = jj
        jj += 1

    #print 'intersections =', intersections
    return intersections & 1  


@njit(parallel=True)
def is_inside_sm_parallel(points, polygon):
    ln = len(points)
    D = np.empty(ln, dtype=numba.boolean) 
    for i in numba.prange(ln):
        D[i] = is_inside_sm(polygon,points[i])
    return D

方法 5： is_inside_postgis（从 here 获得）

@jit(nopython=True)
def is_inside_postgis(polygon, point):
    length = len(polygon)
    intersections = 0

    dx2 = point[0] - polygon[0][0]
    dy2 = point[1] - polygon[0][1]
    ii = 0
    jj = 1

    while jj<length:
        dx  = dx2
        dy  = dy2
        dx2 = point[0] - polygon[jj][0]
        dy2 = point[1] - polygon[jj][1]

        F =(dx-dx2)*dy - dx*(dy-dy2);
        if 0.0==F and dx*dx2<=0 and dy*dy2<=0:
            return 2;

        if (dy>=0 and dy2<0) or (dy2>=0 and dy<0):
            if F > 0:
                intersections += 1
            elif F < 0:
                intersections -= 1

        ii = jj
        jj += 1

    #print 'intersections =', intersections
    return intersections != 0  


@njit(parallel=True)
def is_inside_postgis_parallel(points, polygon):
    ln = len(points)
    D = np.empty(ln, dtype=numba.boolean) 
    for i in numba.prange(ln):
        D[i] = is_inside_postgis(polygon,points[i])
    return D

基准

enter image description here

1000 万积分计时：

parallelpointinpolygon Elapsed time:      4.0122294425964355
Matplotlib contains_points Elapsed time: 14.117807388305664
ray_tracing_numpy_numba Elapsed time:     7.908452272415161
sm_parallel Elapsed time:                 0.7710440158843994
is_inside_postgis_parallel Elapsed time:  2.131121873855591

这是代码。

import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import matplotlib.path as mpltPath
from time import time
import numpy as np

np.random.seed(2)

time_parallelpointinpolygon=[]
time_mpltPath=[]
time_ray_tracing_numpy_numba=[]
time_is_inside_sm_parallel=[]
time_is_inside_postgis_parallel=[]
n_points=[]

for i in range(1, 10000002, 1000000): 
    n_points.append(i)
    
    lenpoly = 100
    polygon = [[np.sin(x)+0.5,np.cos(x)+0.5] for x in np.linspace(0,2*np.pi,lenpoly)]
    polygon = np.array(polygon)
    N = i
    points = np.random.uniform(-1.5, 1.5, size=(N, 2))
    
    
    #Method 1
    start_time = time()
    inside1=parallelpointinpolygon(points, polygon)
    time_parallelpointinpolygon.append(time()-start_time)

    # Method 2
    start_time = time()
    path = mpltPath.Path(polygon,closed=True)
    inside2 = path.contains_points(points)
    time_mpltPath.append(time()-start_time)

    # Method 3
    start_time = time()
    inside3=ray_tracing_numpy_numba(points,polygon)
    time_ray_tracing_numpy_numba.append(time()-start_time)

    # Method 4
    start_time = time()
    inside4=is_inside_sm_parallel(points,polygon)
    time_is_inside_sm_parallel.append(time()-start_time)

    # Method 5
    start_time = time()
    inside5=is_inside_postgis_parallel(points,polygon)
    time_is_inside_postgis_parallel.append(time()-start_time)


    
plt.plot(n_points,time_parallelpointinpolygon,label='parallelpointinpolygon')
plt.plot(n_points,time_mpltPath,label='mpltPath')
plt.plot(n_points,time_ray_tracing_numpy_numba,label='ray_tracing_numpy_numba')
plt.plot(n_points,time_is_inside_sm_parallel,label='is_inside_sm_parallel')
plt.plot(n_points,time_is_inside_postgis_parallel,label='is_inside_postgis_parallel')
plt.xlabel("N points")
plt.ylabel("time (sec)")
plt.legend(loc = 'best')
plt.show()

结论

最快的算法是：

1- is_inside_sm_parallel

2- is_inside_postgis_parallel

3- parallelpointinpolygon (@epifanio)

答案 4 :(得分：0)

我将其保留在此处，仅使用numpy重写了上面的代码，也许有人觉得它有用：

def ray_tracing_numpy(x,y,poly):
    n = len(poly)
    inside = np.zeros(len(x),np.bool_)
    p2x = 0.0
    p2y = 0.0
    xints = 0.0
    p1x,p1y = poly[0]
    for i in range(n+1):
        p2x,p2y = poly[i % n]
        idx = np.nonzero((y > min(p1y,p2y)) & (y <= max(p1y,p2y)) & (x <= max(p1x,p2x)))[0]
        if p1y != p2y:
            xints = (y[idx]-p1y)*(p2x-p1x)/(p2y-p1y)+p1x
        if p1x == p2x:
            inside[idx] = ~inside[idx]
        else:
            idxx = idx[x[idx] <= xints]
            inside[idxx] = ~inside[idxx]    

        p1x,p1y = p2x,p2y
    return inside

将ray_trace封装为

def ray_tracing_mult(x,y,poly):
    return [ray_tracing(xi, yi, poly[:-1,:]) for xi,yi in zip(x,y)]

经过100000点测试，结果：

ray_tracing_mult 0:00:00.850656
ray_tracing_numpy 0:00:00.003769

答案 5 :(得分：0)

Even-odd rule 的纯 numpy 向量化实现

其他答案要么是一个缓慢的 python 循环，要么需要外部依赖或 cython 处理。

import numpy as np
        
def points_in_polygon(polygon, pts):
    pts = np.asarray(pts,dtype='float32')
    polygon = np.asarray(polygon,dtype='float32')
    contour2 = np.vstack((polygon[1:], polygon[:1]))
    test_diff = contour2-polygon
    mask1 = (pts[:,None] == polygon).all(-1).any(-1)
    m1 = (polygon[:,1] > pts[:,None,1]) != (contour2[:,1] > pts[:,None,1])
    slope = ((pts[:,None,0]-polygon[:,0])*test_diff[:,1])-(test_diff[:,0]*(pts[:,None,1]-polygon[:,1]))
    m2 = slope == 0
    mask2 = (m1 & m2).any(-1)
    m3 = (slope < 0) != (contour2[:,1] < polygon[:,1])
    m4 = m1 & m3
    count = np.count_nonzero(m4,axis=-1)
    mask3 = ~(count%2==0)
    mask = mask1 | mask2 | mask3
    return mask

    
N = 1000000
lenpoly = 1000
polygon = [[np.sin(x)+0.5,np.cos(x)+0.5] for x in np.linspace(0,2*np.pi,lenpoly)]
polygon = np.array(polygon,dtype='float32')
points = np.random.uniform(-1.5, 1.5, size=(N, 2)).astype('float32')
mask = points_in_polygon(polygon, points)

大小为 1000 的多边形的 100 万个点需要 44 秒。

它比其他实现慢几个数量级，但仍然比 python 循环快，并且只使用 numpy。

相关问题
最新问题