哪种方法更适合性能? 注意:对于某些操作,我最多需要执行五个独立查询。
var foo = await context.foos.ToListAsync();
var bar = await context.bars.ToListAsync();
VS
var fooTask = context1.foos.ToListAsync();
var barTask = context2.bars.ToListAsync();
await Task.WhenAll(fooTask , barTask);
在没有等待的情况下使用相同的上下文会很棒,但this answer提及这是不可能的。
答案 0 :(得分:2)
正如您所知,DbContext不是线程安全的,因此真正并行运行查询的唯一选择是为每个线程/任务创建一个新的DbContext。
创建新DbContext的开销非常低。 https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc853327.aspx
由于该对象来自不同的DbContexts并且为了进一步提高性能,我建议你也使用NoTracking()
编辑:
我使用我拥有的数据库制作了一个简单的测试程序:
class Program
{
public static void Main(string[] args)
{
Console.WriteLine("Warming up db context...");
using (var db = new TestDbContext())
{
Console.WriteLine(db.AuditLogItems.ToList().Count);
}
// 1st run
RunAsync();
RunTasked();
// 2nd run
RunAsync();
RunTasked();
Console.ReadKey();
}
private static void RunAsync()
{
Task.Run(async () =>
{
var sw = Stopwatch.StartNew();
List<AuditLogItem> list1;
List<AuditLogItem> list2;
using (var db = new TestDbContext())
{
list1 = await db.AuditLogItems.AsNoTracking().ToListAsync();
list2 = await db.AuditLogItems.AsNoTracking().ToListAsync();
}
sw.Stop();
Console.WriteLine("Executed {0} in {1}ms. | {2}", "Async", sw.ElapsedMilliseconds, list1.Count + " " + list2.Count);
}).Wait();
}
private static void RunTasked()
{
Func<List<AuditLogItem>> runQuery = () =>
{
using (var db = new TestDbContext())
{
return db.AuditLogItems.AsNoTracking().ToList();
}
};
var sw = Stopwatch.StartNew();
var task1 = Task.Run(runQuery);
var task2 = Task.Run(runQuery);
Task.WaitAll(task1, task2);
sw.Stop();
Console.WriteLine("Executed {0} in {1}ms. | {2}", "Tasked", sw.ElapsedMilliseconds, task1.Result.Count + " " + task2.Result.Count);
}
}
输出结果为:
Warming up db context...
5908
Executed Async in 293ms. | 5908 5908
Executed Tasked in 56ms. | 5908 5908
Executed Async in 194ms. | 5908 5908
Executed Tasked in 32ms. | 5908 5908
是的,选项2更快......