我创建了以下类:
class videodup
{
public:
videodup(QString vid = "", int m_a = 0, int m_b = 0);
~videodup() {}
QString video;
bool operator==(const QString &str) const { return video == str; }
bool operator==(const videodup &dup) const {return video == dup.video;}
QList<matchPair> matches;
};
videodup::videodup(QString vid = "", int m_a = 0, int m_b = 0)
{
video = vid;
matches.append(matchPair(m_a, m_b));
}
我认为它允许我在QString
中使用QList::contains()
,但它给了我一个错误:
/usr/local/Cellar/qt5/5.5.1_2/lib/QtCore.framework/Headers/qlist.h:981: error: invalid operands to binary expression ('videodup' and 'const videodup')
if (i->t() == t)
~~~~~~ ^ ~
/Users/phire/Documents/workspace/VideoTwin/matchpair.h:30: candidate function not viable: no known conversion from 'const videodup' to 'QString &' for 1st argument
bool operator==(QString &str) { return video == str; }
^
违规行是:
if (frame.videomatches.contains(vid))
这是解释上面一行的代码
struct frm
{
QString file;
int position;
cv::Mat descriptors;
QList<videodup> videomatches;
};
QList<frm> frames;
void MainWindow::findDupes(frm &frame)
{
QString file = frame.file;
UMat mat = frame.descriptors.getUMat(cv::ACCESS_RW);
UMat indices;
UMat dists;
if (!mat.isContinuous() || mat.empty())
return;
QTime timestamp(0,0,0,0);
timestamp = timestamp.addMSecs(frame.position);
try
{
mat = mat.reshape(1,1);
index.knnSearch(mat,indices,dists,5);
}
catch (Exception e)
{
qWarning() << "index search failure" << e.err.c_str() << e.msg.c_str();
}
catch (exception& e)
{
qWarning() << "index search failure" << e.what();
}
// qDebug() << "indices cols" << indices.cols << "dists cols" << dists.cols;
db.transaction();
QSqlQuery matches(db);
QStringList tempmatches;
Mat indicesMat = indices.getMat(cv::ACCESS_READ);
Mat distsMat = dists.getMat(cv::ACCESS_READ);
for (int i = 0; i < indicesMat.cols; i++)
{
if (indicesMat.at<int>(0,i) == -1 || distsMat.at<int>(0,i) > 12800)
continue;
try
{
QTime matchtime(0,0,0,0);
int matchms = frames.at( indicesMat.at<int>(0,i)).position;
QString vid = frames.at( indicesMat.at<int>(0,i)).file;
matchtime = matchtime.addMSecs(matchms);
int temp = distsMat.at<int>(0,i);
tempmatches.append(QString::number( indicesMat.at<int>(0,i)));
if (frame.videomatches.contains(vid))
{
matchPair pair(frame.position, indicesMat.at<int>(0,i));
frame.videomatches[ frame.videomatches.indexOf(vid) ].matches.append(pair);
}
else
{
frame.videomatches.append(videodup(vid,frame.position, indicesMat.at<int>(0,i)));
}
// qDebug() << frame.file << "frame"<< timestamp.toString("hh:mm:ss") << "match at"<< vid << matchtime.toString("hh:mm:ss") << "distance" << temp;
}
catch (Exception e)
{
qWarning() << "failure in indices" << e.err.c_str() << e.msg.c_str() << e.func.c_str();
}
catch (exception &e)
{
qWarning() << "failure in indices" << e.what();
}
}
QString temp(tempmatches.join(","));
matches.prepare("UPDATE frames SET matches = :matches WHERE file = :file AND position = :position");
matches.bindValue(":matches",temp);
matches.bindValue(":file",frame.file);
matches.bindValue(":position",frame.position);
if (!matches.exec())
qWarning() << "couldn't add matches to frame in database";
db.commit();
}
如何让我的自定义类与QString
相媲美?
答案 0 :(得分:1)
好的,这就是我认为这里的锣。首先,最重要的是,
bool QList::contains(const T & value) const;
此函数需要(a)类型为T
的对象(它存储的类型)或(b)类型R
的对象,可以某种方式转换为T
。究竟怎么样?通过转化运算符R::T()
或带有R
:T
的c'tor或R:R(T&)
。看,你有完全可用的后者。 videodup::videodup(QString&, int=default, int=default)
。
这就是实际问题:
一旦编译器通过上述构造函数成功将QString
转换为videodup
,它就会根据videodup::operator==(const videodup&)
函数的要求调用QList::contains(const T&)
,并且可以找不到一个。因此,您需要取消注释并实现videodup::operator==(const videodup&)
,就像Michael所说的那样。
编辑:
我还认为,为了避免这种隐式转换,我们可以使用STL std::find<Iterator, T>
函数,并利用videodup::operator==(const QString&)
。为此,只需替换
if (frame.videomatches.contains(vid)) {
与
const auto &matches = frame.videomatches;
if (std::find(matches.cbegin(), matches.cend(), vid) != matches.cend()) {
我很确定这会直接使用现有的运算符,避免不必要的转换。
答案 1 :(得分:1)
错误消息是抱怨尝试比较'videodup'和'const videodup'。
您只需要定义一个bool operator==(const videodup &) const
函数。
QString
,因为这是videodup::operator==()
接受的唯一类型,因此编译器尝试转换为QString
但发现它不能。