注意:我知道在java 5之前(2004年给出),在java中,双重检查锁定会失败,即使你将“volatile”添加到“instance”字段。在java 5之后,volatile的语义已经适合双重检查锁。由于无序执行,我甚至在java5之后也知道without "volatile", double checking lock will fail。但是,我的问题是:如何编写代码来证明(双重检查锁定会在没有“volatile”的情况下失败)???
我已经阅读了很多文章说在Java中双重检查锁会失败,所以我认为下面的代码试图获得SocketFactory的单例实例,会失败(因为“实例”字段不是易变的):< / p>
private static SocketFactory instance = null;
private static SocketFactory getInstance() {
if (instance == null) {
synchronized (SocketFactory.class){
if (instance == null){
instance = new SocketFactory(); // line 1
}
}
}
return instance;
}
但问题是,如果上面的代码失败了,我怎么能证明这一点?我试着写下面的代码(我想,如果第1行将被重新排序,“实例”引用可能指向一个SocketFactory对象,其中“construct”字段为“false”):
import java.io.*;
import java.nio.*;
import java.nio.file.*;
public class TIJ_doubleCheckingLock {
static TIJ_doubleCheckingLock instance;
private Object lock;
private boolean constructed = false;
{
constructed = false;
}
private TIJ_doubleCheckingLock() {
try{
Thread.sleep(10000);
} catch(Exception e) {
}
constructed = true;
}
static TIJ_doubleCheckingLock getInstance() {
if (instance == null) {
synchronized (TIJ_doubleCheckingLock.class) {
try{
Thread.sleep(1000);
} catch(Exception e) {
}
if(instance == null) {
instance = new TIJ_doubleCheckingLock();
}
}
}
return instance;
}
public static void main(String args[]) {
class MyThread extends Thread {
@Override
public void run() {
TIJ_doubleCheckingLock instance = TIJ_doubleCheckingLock.getInstance();
String fileName = "TIJ_doubleCheckingLockResult.txt";
java.io.File file = new File(fileName);
try {
if(!instance.constructed) {
java.nio.file.Files.write(Paths.get(file.toURI()), (instance.constructed+"").
getBytes("utf-8"), StandardOpenOption.CREATE, StandardOpenOption.APPEND);
}
} catch (Exception e) {
}
}
}
Thread firstThread = new MyThread();
firstThread.start();
try{
Thread.sleep(5000);
} catch(Exception e) {}
for(int i=0;i<10;i++) {
Thread thread = new MyThread();
thread.start();
}
}
}
但我从未在txt文件中看到“false”。 那么如何证明双重检查锁定会失败呢?
答案 0 :(得分:1)
双重检查锁定was broken in Java。您的代码适用于Java 5及更高版本。 JVM收到了new memory model。
此外,您的代码需要volatile
关键字。
private static volatile SocketFactory instance;
答案 1 :(得分:-1)
你需要知道我的代码在synchronized中的区别:
import java.util.concurrent.BrokenBarrierException;
import java.util.concurrent.CyclicBarrier;
/**
* @author heyunxia (love3400wind@163.com)
* @version 1.0
* @since 2016-01-15 下午3:50
*/
public class SocketFactoryTest {
public static void main(String[] args) {
SocketFactoryTest test = new SocketFactoryTest();
test.run();
}
private static final int COUNTER = 20;
CyclicBarrier barrier = new CyclicBarrier(COUNTER);
public void run(){
for(int i=0; i<COUNTER; i++) {
new Thread(new Runnable() {
@Override
public void run() {
SocketFactory.getInstance(barrier);
}
}).start();
}
}
}
class SocketFactory {
private static SocketFactory instance = null;
public static SocketFactory getInstance(CyclicBarrier barrier) {
if (instance == null) {
try {
barrier.await();
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
} catch (BrokenBarrierException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
synchronized (SocketFactory.class) {
// option 1
instance = new SocketFactory();
System.out.println(Thread.currentThread().getName() + "***");
/*
// option 2
if (instance == null) {
System.out.println(Thread.currentThread().getName() + "***");
instance = new SocketFactory();
}else {
System.out.println(Thread.currentThread().getName() + "-have already instanced...");
}*/
}
}
return instance;
}
}