我有两个numpy整数数组,长度都是几亿。在每个数组中,值是唯一的,每个值最初都是未排序的。
我希望各自的索引产生它们的排序交集。例如:
x = np.array([4, 1, 10, 5, 8, 13, 11])
y = np.array([20, 5, 4, 9, 11, 7, 25])
然后这些排序的交集是[4, 5, 11]
,所以我们想要将x和y中的每一个转换成该数组的索引,所以我们希望它返回:
mx = np.array([0, 3, 6])
my = np.array([2, 1, 4])
此后x[mx] == y[my] == np.intersect1d(x, y)
到目前为止,我们唯一的解决方案涉及三种不同的方法,因此似乎不太可能是最优的。
每个值代表一个星系,以防这个问题变得更有趣。
答案 0 :(得分:3)
对于一个纯粹的numpy解决方案,你可以这样做:
使用np.unique
分别获取x
和y
中的唯一值和相应索引:
# sorted unique values in x and y and the indices corresponding to their first
# occurrences, such that u_x == x[u_idx_x]
u_x, u_idx_x = np.unique(x, return_index=True)
u_y, u_idx_y = np.unique(y, return_index=True)
# we can assume_unique, which can be faster for large arrays
i_xy = np.intersect1d(u_x, u_y, assume_unique=True)
最后,使用np.in1d
仅选择与x
或y
中的唯一值对应的索引,这些索引恰好位于x
的交叉点和y
:
# it is also safe to assume_unique here
i_idx_x = u_idx_x[np.in1d(u_x, i_xy, assume_unique=True)]
i_idx_y = u_idx_y[np.in1d(u_y, i_xy, assume_unique=True)]
将所有内容整合到一个功能中:
def intersect_indices(x, y):
u_x, u_idx_x = np.unique(x, return_index=True)
u_y, u_idx_y = np.unique(y, return_index=True)
i_xy = np.intersect1d(u_x, u_y, assume_unique=True)
i_idx_x = u_idx_x[np.in1d(u_x, i_xy, assume_unique=True)]
i_idx_y = u_idx_y[np.in1d(u_y, i_xy, assume_unique=True)]
return i_idx_x, i_idx_y
例如:
x = np.array([4, 1, 10, 5, 8, 13, 11])
y = np.array([20, 5, 4, 9, 11, 7, 25])
i_idx_x, i_idx_y = intersect_indices(x, y)
print(i_idx_x, i_idx_y)
# (array([0, 3, 6]), array([2, 1, 4]))
速度测试:
In [1]: k = 1000000
In [2]: %%timeit x, y = np.random.randint(k, size=(2, k))
intersect_indices(x, y)
....:
1 loops, best of 3: 597 ms per loop
我最初错过了这样一个事实:在您的情况下,x
和y
都只包含唯一值。考虑到这一点,使用间接排序可以做得更好:
def intersect_indices_unique(x, y):
u_idx_x = np.argsort(x)
u_idx_y = np.argsort(y)
i_xy = np.intersect1d(x, y, assume_unique=True)
i_idx_x = u_idx_x[x[u_idx_x].searchsorted(i_xy)]
i_idx_y = u_idx_y[y[u_idx_y].searchsorted(i_xy)]
return i_idx_x, i_idx_y
这是一个更现实的测试用例,其中x
和y
都包含唯一(但部分重叠)的值:
In [1]: n, k = 10000000, 1000000
In [2]: %%timeit x, y = (np.random.choice(n, size=k, replace=False) for _ in range(2))
intersect_indices(x, y)
....:
1 loops, best of 3: 593 ms per loop
In [3]: %%timeit x, y = (np.random.choice(n, size=k, replace=False) for _ in range(2))
intersect_indices_unique(x, y)
....:
1 loops, best of 3: 453 ms per loop
@Divakar 的解决方案在性能方面非常相似:
In [4]: %%timeit x, y = (np.random.choice(n, size=k, replace=False) for _ in range(2))
searchsorted_based(x, y)
....:
1 loops, best of 3: 472 ms per loop
答案 1 :(得分:3)
这是一个基于intersect1d
实施的选项,相当简单。它需要拨打argsort
。
无可否认的简单测试通过。
import numpy as np
def my_intersect(x, y):
"""my_intersect(x, y) -> xm, ym
x, y: 1-d arrays of unique values
xm, ym: indices into x and y giving sorted intersection
"""
# basic idea taken from numpy.lib.arraysetops.intersect1d
aux = np.concatenate((x, y))
sidx = aux.argsort()
# Note: intersect1d uses aux[:-1][aux[1:]==aux[:-1]] here - I don't know why the first [:-1] is necessary
inidx = aux[sidx[1:]] == aux[sidx[:-1]]
# quicksort is not stable, so must do some work to extract indices
# (if stable, sidx[inidx.nonzero()] would be for x)
# interlace the two sets of indices, and check against lengths
xym = np.vstack((sidx[inidx.nonzero()],
sidx[1:][inidx.nonzero()])).T.flatten()
xm = xym[xym < len(x)]
ym = xym[xym >= len(x)] - len(x)
return xm, ym
def check_my_intersect(x, y):
mx, my = my_intersect(x, y)
assert (x[mx] == np.intersect1d(x, y)).all()
# not really necessary: np.intersect1d returns a sorted list
assert (x[mx] == sorted(x[mx])).all()
assert (x[mx] == y[my]).all()
def random_unique_unsorted(n):
while True:
x = np.unique(np.random.randint(2*n, size=n))
if len(x):
break
np.random.shuffle(x)
return x
x = np.array([4, 1, 10, 5, 8, 13, 11])
y = np.array([20, 5, 4, 9, 11, 7, 25])
check_my_intersect(x, y)
for i in range(20):
x = random_unique_unsorted(100+i)
y = random_unique_unsorted(200+i)
check_my_intersect(x, y)
编辑:&#34;注意&#34;注释令人困惑(使用...
作为语音省略号,忘了它也是一个Python运算符。)
答案 2 :(得分:3)
你也可以使用np.searchsorted
,就像这样 -
def searchsorted_based(x,y):
# Get argsort for both x and y
xsort_idx = x.argsort()
ysort_idx = y.argsort()
# Sort x and y and store them
X = x[xsort_idx]
Y = y[ysort_idx]
# Find positions of Y in X and the matches by the positions that
# shift between 'left' and 'right' based searches.
# Use the matches posotions to get corresponding argsort for X.
x1 = np.searchsorted(X,Y,'left')
x2 = np.searchsorted(X,Y,'right')
out1 = xsort_idx[x1[x2 != x1]]
# Repeat for X in Y findings
y1 = np.searchsorted(Y,X,'left')
y2 = np.searchsorted(Y,X,'right')
out2 = ysort_idx[y1[y2 != y1]]
return out1, out2
示例运行 -
In [100]: x = np.array([4, 1, 10, 5, 8, 13, 11])
...: y = np.array([20, 5, 4, 9, 11, 7, 25])
...:
In [101]: searchsorted_based(x,y)
Out[101]: (array([0, 3, 6]), array([2, 1, 4]))
答案 3 :(得分:0)
使用dict的纯Python解决方案可能适合您:
def indices_from_values(a, intersect):
idx = {value: index for index, value in enumerate(a)}
return np.array([idx[x] for x in intersect])
intersect = np.intersect1d(x, y)
mx = indices_from_values(x, intersect)
my = indices_from_values(y, intersect)
np.allclose(x[mx], y[my]) and np.allclose(x[mx], np.intersect1d(x, y))