所以我有以下简单的片段:
template <typename T, size_t size>
struct SquareMatrix {
public:
T data[size * size];
constexpr T & operator()(const size_t row, const size_t col) noexcept {
return data[row * size + col];
}
};
constexpr auto generate() {
auto result = SquareMatrix<int, 2>{};
result(0, 0) = 1;
result(1, 0) = 3;
result(0, 1) = 2;
result(1, 1) = 4;
return result;
}
data
生成的SquareMatrix<int, 2>
generate()
数组的预期内容为1, 2, 3, 4
。然而...
constexpr auto test = generate();
int main() {
for (size_t i = 0; i < 4; ++i) {
std::cout << test.data[i] << std::endl;
}
return 0;
}
如果我使用g ++ 5.2和-std=c++14
编译并运行此代码,则打印到控制台的结果奇怪地是1032
。
如果删除constexpr限定符,使其在运行时执行,或者我改为编写以下任何一个轻微变体:
int main() {
constexpr auto test = generate();
for (size_t i = 0; i < 4; ++i) {
std::cout << test.data[i];
}
return 0;
}
......或......
constexpr auto generate() {
auto result = SquareMatrix<int, 2>{};
result(0, 0) = 1;
result(0, 1) = 2; // this line and
result(1, 0) = 3; // this line have been swapped
result(1, 1) = 4;
return result;
}
constexpr auto test = generate();
int main() {
for (size_t i = 0; i < 4; ++i) {
std::cout << test.data[i];
}
return 0;
}
...打印出预期结果1234
。此外,clang ++ 3.7.0在所有情况下都会打印出预期的1234
。
我遇到过g ++错误,还是我错过了什么?
答案 0 :(得分:7)
这看起来与gcc错误[5 regression] Constant expression factory function initializes std::array with static storage duration strangely有关,如果我们尝试使用gcc head live example,则可以正常使用。
错误报告具有以下类似示例,其中静态变量案例表现出类似问题,而自动变量案例则没有:
#include <array>
#include <cassert>
namespace /* anonymous */
{
constexpr auto
make_array(const int val) noexcept
{
std::array<int, 2> result = { { val, 0 } };
return result;
}
// Replacing `constexpr` by `const` doesn't change anything.
constexpr auto numbers_static = make_array(42);
}
int main()
{
const auto numbers_automatic = make_array(42);
assert(numbers_automatic[0] == 42); // okay
assert(numbers_static[0] == 42); // fails
}