由于writing a ListIsomorphic
instance for generic vectors似乎不可能(或者不是一个好主意),我正试图直接为Vector.Unboxed
编写一个。
class ListIsomorphic l where
toList :: l a -> [a]
fromList :: [a] -> l a
instance ListIsomorphic UV.Vector where
toList = UV.toList
fromList = UV.fromList
我收到以下错误:
test.hs:70:14:
No instance for (UV.Unbox a) arising from a use of ‘UV.toList’
Possible fix:
add (UV.Unbox a) to the context of
the type signature for toList :: UV.Vector a -> [a]
In the expression: UV.toList
In an equation for ‘toList’: toList = UV.toList
In the instance declaration for ‘ListIsomorphic UV.Vector’
test.hs:71:16:
No instance for (UV.Unbox a) arising from a use of ‘UV.fromList’
Possible fix:
add (UV.Unbox a) to the context of
the type signature for fromList :: [a] -> UV.Vector a
In the expression: UV.fromList
In an equation for ‘fromList’: fromList = UV.fromList
In the instance declaration for ‘ListIsomorphic UV.Vector’
我已经尝试过遵循编译器错误建议,但它没有用。我怎么写呢?
答案 0 :(得分:2)
你不能。您的ListIsomorphic
课程承诺fromList
可以应用于任何类型a
。但是,未装箱的向量要求a
是Unbox
的实例。
您可以改为编写一个具有以下内容的类ListIsomorphicUnboxed
class ListIsomorphicUnboxed l where
fromListUnboxed :: (Unbox a) => [a] -> l a
toListUnboxed :: (Unbox a) => l a -> [a]
另一种方法可能是使用约束(您需要添加一些语言扩展):
{-# LANGUAGE ConstraintKinds, TypeFamilies #-}
import GHC.Exts (Constraint)
class ListIsomorphic l where
type C l a :: Constraint
type C l a = () -- default to no constraint
fromList :: C l a => [a] -> l a
toList :: C l a => l a -> [a]
instance ListIsomorphic UV.Vector where
type C UV.Vector a = UV.Unbox a
toList = UV.toList
fromList = UV.fromList
(代码未经测试!)
这样每个实例都可以有不同的约束。然而,这不是一个非常常见的解决方案。